• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲疗法与急性 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率的关系:全国临床队列研究。

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study.

机构信息

Okinawa Nanbu Prefectural Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Haebaru, Okinawa, Japan.

Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2023 Feb 8;27(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04337-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04337-5
PMID:36755340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906603/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Steroids are widely used to modulate the inflammatory reactions associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the optimal upper limit dose of steroid use for acute COVID-19 care remains unclear and currently available data may suffer from a time-dependent bias of no effectiveness or reversed causation given the desperate situation of treatment during this pandemic. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (500 mg or greater per day) on the risk of in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19 by controlling for time-dependent bias.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study with 67,348 hospitalised acute COVID-19 patients at 438 hospitals during 2020-2021 in Japan. The impact of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the risk of in-hospital mortality was examined based on hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), with stratification according to the status of invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV). Time-dependent bias was controlled for in a marginal structural model analysis, with reference to patients without methylprednisolone therapy.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2400 patients died. In-hospital mortality rates of iMV-free patients without or with methylprednisolone pulse therapy were 2.3% and 19.5%, and the corresponding values for iMV-receiving patients were 24.7% and 28.6%, respectively. The marginal structural model analysis showed that intravenous pulse therapy with methylprednisolone was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality among patients receiving-iMV (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.52-0.68). In contrast, pulse therapy with methylprednisolone increased the risk of in-hospital mortality among iMV-free patients (HR 3.38; 95% CI 3.02-3.79). The benefits of pulse therapy for iMV-receiving patients were greater than in those treated with intermediate/higher doses (40-250 mg intravenously) of methylprednisolone (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.89).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that intravenous methylprednisolone showed dose-response efficiencies, and pulse therapy may benefit critically ill patients with acute COVID-19, such as those requiring iMV.

摘要

背景

类固醇被广泛用于调节与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的炎症反应;然而,急性 COVID-19 护理中类固醇使用的最佳上限剂量仍不清楚,并且由于在大流行期间治疗的紧急情况,目前可用的数据可能存在无效或因果关系逆转的时间依赖性偏差。因此,本研究旨在通过控制时间依赖性偏差,阐明静脉注射甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法(每天 500 毫克或更高剂量)对 COVID-19 住院患者院内死亡率风险的影响。

方法

我们在 2020 年至 2021 年期间,在日本的 438 家医院对 67348 例住院急性 COVID-19 患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。根据风险比(HRs)和 95%置信区间(95%CI),并根据有创机械通气(iMV)的状态进行分层,检查静脉内甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法对院内死亡率风险的影响。通过参考未接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者,在边缘结构模型分析中控制时间依赖性偏差。

结果

在研究期间,有 2400 名患者死亡。无 iMV 接受者和接受 iMV 接受者中未接受或接受甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗的患者的院内死亡率分别为 2.3%和 19.5%,相应的患者为 24.7%和 28.6%。边缘结构模型分析表明,静脉内甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法与接受 iMV 的患者的院内死亡率降低相关(HR 0.59;95%CI 0.52-0.68)。相比之下,甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗增加了无 iMV 接受者的院内死亡率风险(HR 3.38;95%CI 3.02-3.79)。接受 iMV 的患者接受甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗的益处大于接受中等/高剂量(40-250 毫克静脉内)的患者(HR 0.80;95%CI 0.71-0.89)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,静脉内甲泼尼龙显示出剂量反应效率,脉冲疗法可能有益于急性 COVID-19 的重症患者,例如需要 iMV 的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/1ead5784b14d/13054_2023_4337_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/87884890cff6/13054_2023_4337_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/9d76f6ac3efb/13054_2023_4337_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/1ead5784b14d/13054_2023_4337_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/87884890cff6/13054_2023_4337_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/9d76f6ac3efb/13054_2023_4337_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9085/9906878/1ead5784b14d/13054_2023_4337_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study.静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲疗法与急性 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率的关系:全国临床队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Feb 8;27(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04337-5.
2
Effect of pulse methylprednisolone on prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 patients with severe pneumonia.脉冲甲基泼尼松龙对重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者预后的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Feb;28(3):1234-1240. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35362.
3
Pulse Methylprednisolone Versus Dexamethasone in COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.新冠疫情中脉冲式甲泼尼龙与地塞米松的对比:一项多中心队列研究
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Mar 27;5(4):e0886. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000886. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy.意大利伦巴第地区重症监护病房中 COVID-19 患者死亡的相关危险因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1345-1355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539.
5
Clinical and virological characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in a German tertiary care centre during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a prospective observational study.德国一家三级保健中心在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行第一波期间住院 COVID-19 患者的临床和病毒学特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Infection. 2021 Aug;49(4):703-714. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01594-w. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Impact of time to intubation on mortality and pulmonary sequelae in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.COVID-19 危重症患者插管时间对死亡率和肺部后遗症的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 10;26(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03882-1.
7
Comparison of pulse-dose and high-dose corticosteroids with no corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia in the intensive care unit.比较 ICU 中 COVID-19 肺炎患者的脉冲剂量和高剂量皮质类固醇与无皮质类固醇治疗。
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):349-356. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27351. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
Timing of invasive mechanical ventilation and death in critically ill adults with COVID-19: A multicenter cohort study.COVID-19 重症成人有创机械通气时机与死亡:一项多中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 28;18(6):e0285748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285748. eCollection 2023.
9
Timing of invasive mechanic ventilation in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019.COVID-19 危重症患者有创机械通气时机。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1092-1098. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002939.
10
Comparison of methylprednisolone pulse vs conventional dexamethasone for adult cases of COVID-19 requiring oxygen; a Japanese retrospective cohort study.比较甲泼尼龙脉冲与常规地塞米松治疗需要吸氧的成人 COVID-19 病例:一项日本回顾性队列研究。
J Infect Chemother. 2023 Mar;29(3):269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Steroid Pulse Therapy Leads to Secondary Infections and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study.重症监护病房中,类固醇脉冲疗法导致严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)患者继发感染且预后不良:一项回顾性队列研究。
Viruses. 2025 Jun 6;17(6):822. doi: 10.3390/v17060822.
2
A comparative study between methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone as an initial anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-label randomized controlled trial.甲泼尼龙与地塞米松作为中重度 COVID-19 肺炎初始抗炎治疗的对比研究:一项开放标签随机对照试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03364-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19:与公平相关的分析和证据更新。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
2
Effect of corticosteroid therapy on mortality in COVID-19 patients-A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖皮质激素治疗对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Med Virol. 2022 Sep;32(5):e2386. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2386. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
Pulse versus nonpulse steroid regimens in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Continuous glucose monitoring profile in COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes receiving methylprednisolone.
接受甲泼尼龙治疗的合并或未合并糖尿病的COVID-19患者的连续血糖监测情况
Endocrine. 2024 Nov;86(2):556-563. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03841-0. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Assessing antiviral treatment efficacy and risk factors for severe COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients during the Omicron subvariant-dominant period: a retrospective study.评估奥密克戎亚变体主导期肾移植受者 COVID-19 重症的抗病毒治疗效果及相关危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Apr 8;25(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03561-7.
5
Causal inference using observational intensive care unit data: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.利用重症监护病房观察性数据进行因果推断:一项范围综述及对未来实践的建议。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 27;6(1):221. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00961-1.
6
High-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy during refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study.大剂量甲基强的松龙脉冲疗法治疗难治性 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02664-5.
新冠肺炎患者中脉冲与非脉冲类固醇治疗方案的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2022 Sep;94(9):4125-4137. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27824. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Treatment with 3-day methylprednisolone pulses in severe cases of COVID-19 compared with the standard regimen protocol of dexamethasone.与地塞米松标准治疗方案相比,在 COVID-19 重症患者中使用 3 天甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗。
J Investig Med. 2022 Aug;70(6):1423-1428. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002274. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Effectiveness of pulse dose methyl prednisolone in management of COVID 19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.脉冲剂量甲基强的松龙治疗 COVID-19 的疗效:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2022;25:110-123. doi: 10.18433/jpps32430.
6
Methylprednisolone Pulses in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Without Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.住院无呼吸衰竭的COVID-19患者使用甲泼尼龙冲击治疗:一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 28;9:807981. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.807981. eCollection 2022.
7
Association between Nafamostat Mesylate and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Multicenter Observational Study.甲磺酸萘莫司他与2019冠状病毒病患者院内死亡率的关联:一项多中心观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 26;11(1):116. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010116.
8
Comparison of patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality between patients with COVID-19 in 2020 and those with influenza in 2017-2020: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in Japan.2020年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者与2017 - 2020年流感患者的特征及院内死亡率比较:日本一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Mar;20:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100365. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
9
Japanese rapid/living recommendations on drug management for COVID-19: updated guidelines (September 2021).日本关于新型冠状病毒肺炎药物管理的快速/现行建议:更新指南(2021年9月)
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8(1):e706. doi: 10.1002/ams2.706. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
Effect of Different Corticosteroid Regimens on the Outcome of Severe COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Failure. A Retrospective Analysis.不同皮质类固醇治疗方案对重症新型冠状病毒肺炎相关急性呼吸衰竭结局的影响。一项回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 21;10(21):4847. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214847.