• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两个生长阶段收获的燕麦中分离化学和微生物因素,以确定青贮发酵的主要因素。

Separating the chemical and microbial factors of oat harvested at two growth stages to determine the main factor on silage fermentation.

机构信息

Institute of Ensiling and Processing of Grass, College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jun;132(6):4266-4276. doi: 10.1111/jam.15566. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1111/jam.15566
PMID:35384180
Abstract

AIMS

This work evaluated the effects of epiphytic microbiota and chemical components on fermentation quality and microbial community of ensiled oat.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Oat harvested at the heading stage (HS) and the milk stage (MS) was sterilized by gamma-ray irradiation and inoculated as the following: (1) HS epiphytic microbiota + sterilized HS (H-H); (2) MS epiphytic microbiota + sterilized HS (M-H); (3) MS epiphytic microbiota + sterilized MS (M-M); and (4) HS epiphytic microbiota + sterilized MS (H-M). After 60-day fermentation, silages inoculated with the epiphytic microbiota of HS had higher acetic acid content than those inoculated with MS. Silage made from sterilized MS had lower pH, ammonia nitrogen and butyric acid contents and higher dry matter, water-soluble carbohydrates and lactic acid contents than that made from sterilized HS. The microbial communities of oat silages were similar, and they were mainly Lactobacillus.

CONCLUSIONS

The chemical component rather than the epiphytic microbiota at harvest exerted more effects on oat silages.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This work reveals the different effects of chemical and microbial factors on the fermentation of silage, which is instructive for us to produce quality silage.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了附生微生物群和化学组分对燕麦青贮发酵品质和微生物群落的影响。

方法和结果

采用γ射线辐照对处于抽穗期(HS)和乳熟期(MS)的燕麦进行灭菌处理,并接种以下处理:(1)HS 附生微生物群+灭菌 HS(H-H);(2)MS 附生微生物群+灭菌 HS(M-H);(3)MS 附生微生物群+灭菌 MS(M-M);和(4)HS 附生微生物群+灭菌 MS(H-M)。经过 60 天发酵后,接种 HS 附生微生物群的青贮料中乙酸含量高于接种 MS 附生微生物群的青贮料。与来自灭菌 HS 的青贮料相比,来自灭菌 MS 的青贮料具有更低的 pH 值、氨态氮和丁酸含量以及更高的干物质、水溶性碳水化合物和乳酸含量。燕麦青贮料的微生物群落相似,主要为乳杆菌属。

结论

收获时的化学组分而非附生微生物群对燕麦青贮料的发酵有更大的影响。

研究意义和影响

本研究揭示了化学和微生物因素对青贮发酵的不同影响,这对我们生产优质青贮料具有指导意义。

相似文献

1
Separating the chemical and microbial factors of oat harvested at two growth stages to determine the main factor on silage fermentation.在两个生长阶段收获的燕麦中分离化学和微生物因素,以确定青贮发酵的主要因素。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jun;132(6):4266-4276. doi: 10.1111/jam.15566. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Effect of epiphytic microbiota from napiergrass and Sudan grass on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community in oat silage.黑麦草和苏丹草附生微生物对燕麦青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Feb;132(2):919-932. doi: 10.1111/jam.15293. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
3
The effects of epiphytic microbiota and chemical composition of Italian ryegrass harvested at different growth stages on silage fermentation.不同生长阶段收获的意大利黑麦草的附生微生物群和化学成分对青贮发酵的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2023 Feb;103(3):1385-1393. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12232. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
4
Gamma-ray irradiation and microbiota transplantation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial diurnal variations on the fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of Napier grass silage.γ射线辐照和微生物群移植以区分化学和微生物昼夜变化对象草青贮发酵特性和细菌群落的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Aug 15;102(10):4322-4332. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11784. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Exploring the ensiling characteristics and bacterial community of red clover inoculated with the epiphytic bacteria from temperate gramineous grasses.探究接种温带禾本科植物附生菌的红三叶草青贮特性及细菌群落。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Jan;132(1):177-188. doi: 10.1111/jam.15234. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
6
Using γ-ray irradiation and epiphytic microbiota inoculation to separate the effects of chemical and microbial factors on fermentation quality and bacterial community of ensiled Pennisetum giganteum.采用γ-射线辐照和附生微生物接种来分离化学和微生物因素对青贮巨菌草发酵品质和细菌群落的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Mar;132(3):1675-1686. doi: 10.1111/jam.15323. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Diurnal Variation of Epiphytic Microbiota: an Unignorable Factor Affecting the Anaerobic Fermentation Characteristics of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Silage.附生微生物群落的昼夜变化:影响高粱-苏丹草混贮青贮厌氧发酵特性的不可忽视因素。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0340422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03404-22. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.青贮苏丹草过程中饲料作物附生微生物菌群的丰度和多样性及其发酵特性。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 12;37(2):27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02991-3.
9
Sequencing and microbiota transplantation to determine the role of microbiota on the fermentation type of oat silage.测序和微生物移植以确定微生物群在燕麦青贮发酵类型中的作用。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Aug;309:123371. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123371. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
10
Silage fermentation characteristics and microbial diversity of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to exogenous microbiota from temperate grasses.苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)对外源温带禾草微生物组的青贮发酵特性及微生物多样性响应
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct 22;37(12):204. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03155-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Fermentability coefficient of tropical forages and fermentative profile and in vitro degradability of silages.热带牧草的发酵系数、青贮饲料的发酵特性及体外降解率
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31213. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16231-x.
2
Characterization of phyllosphere endophytic lactic acid bacteria reveals a potential novel route to enhance silage fermentation quality.叶片内生乳酸菌的特性研究揭示了一种提高青贮发酵质量的潜在新途径。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jan 22;7(1):117. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-05816-3.
3
Effects of harvest stages and lactic acid bacteria additives on the nutritional quality of silage derived from triticale, rye, and oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.
青藏高原小黑麦、黑麦和燕麦青贮的收获期和乳酸菌添加剂对其营养价值的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 3;11:e15772. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15772. eCollection 2023.
4
Community Synergy of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Cleaner Fermentation of Oat Silage Prepared with a Multispecies Microbial Inoculant.多菌种微生物添加剂对燕麦青贮的协同发酵和清洁发酵。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0070523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00705-23. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Effect of different regions on fermentation profiles, microbial communities, and their metabolomic pathways and properties in Italian ryegrass silage.不同区域对意大利黑麦草青贮发酵特性、微生物群落及其代谢途径和特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1076499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1076499. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of growth stage on the fermentation quality, microbial community, and metabolomic properties of Italian ryegrass ( Lam.) silage.生育期对多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质、微生物群落及代谢组学特性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1054612. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1054612. eCollection 2022.
7
Microbial Community, Co-Occurrence Network Relationship and Fermentation Lignocellulose Characteristics of Ensiled with Wheat Bran.麸皮青贮的微生物群落、共现网络关系及发酵木质纤维素特性
Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 12;10(10):2015. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102015.