Suppr超能文献

利用近期接种人群检测 COVID-19 疫苗有效性的病例对照研究中的偏倚。

Use of Recently Vaccinated Individuals to Detect Bias in Test-Negative Case-Control Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness.

机构信息

From the Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2022 Jul 1;33(4):450-456. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001484. Epub 2022 Apr 1.

Abstract

Postauthorization observational studies play a key role in understanding COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness following the demonstration of efficacy in clinical trials. Although bias due to confounding, selection bias, and misclassification can be mitigated through careful study design, unmeasured confounding is likely to remain in these observational studies. Phase III trials of COVID-19 vaccines have shown that protection from vaccination does not occur immediately, meaning that COVID-19 risk should be similar in recently vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, in the absence of confounding or other bias. Several studies have used the estimated effectiveness among recently vaccinated individuals as a negative control exposure to detect bias in vaccine effectiveness estimates. In this paper, we introduce a theoretical framework to describe the interpretation of such a bias indicator in test-negative studies, and outline strong assumptions that would allow vaccine effectiveness among recently vaccinated individuals to serve as a negative control exposure.

摘要

授权后观察性研究在了解临床试验中疗效后 COVID-19 疫苗的有效性方面发挥着关键作用。尽管通过仔细的研究设计可以减轻由于混杂、选择偏倚和分类错误引起的偏倚,但这些观察性研究中仍可能存在未测量的混杂。COVID-19 疫苗的 III 期试验表明,疫苗接种并不能立即产生保护作用,这意味着在没有混杂或其他偏倚的情况下,最近接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的个体的 COVID-19 风险应该相似。几项研究使用最近接种疫苗个体的估计有效性作为阴性对照暴露来检测疫苗有效性估计中的偏倚。在本文中,我们介绍了一个理论框架,用于描述在测试阴性研究中解释这种偏倚指标的方法,并概述了允许最近接种疫苗个体中的疫苗有效性作为阴性对照暴露的强有力假设。

相似文献

1
Use of Recently Vaccinated Individuals to Detect Bias in Test-Negative Case-Control Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness.
Epidemiology. 2022 Jul 1;33(4):450-456. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001484. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
COVID-19 vaccination status and testing rates in Finland-A potential cause for bias in observational vaccine effectiveness analysis.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 Sep;16(5):842-845. doi: 10.1111/irv.12993. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Autumn and Winter 2022 to 2023 Among Older Europeans.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19258.

引用本文的文献

1
Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 30;11:1474045. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1474045. eCollection 2024.
6
The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America, 2021: a multicenter regional case-control study.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023 Apr;20:100474. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100474. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
10
COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias: a retrospective cohort study.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e061126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061126.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine among U.S. Health Care Personnel.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):e90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2106599. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines in Ambulatory and Inpatient Care Settings.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1355-1371. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110362. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Theoretical Framework for Retrospective Studies of the Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.
Epidemiology. 2021 Jul 1;32(4):508-517. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001366.
7
A Selective Review of Negative Control Methods in Epidemiology.
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2020 Dec;7(4):190-202. doi: 10.1007/s40471-020-00243-4. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验