• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A psychometric reevaluation of the TCU criminal thinking scales (CTS).德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表(CTS)的心理测量再评估。
J Offender Rehabil. 2022;61(3):135-147. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2045528. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Toward a hierarchical model of criminal thinking: evidence from item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis.迈向犯罪思维的层级模型:来自项目反应理论和验证性因素分析的证据。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):925-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024017. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
3
An Evaluation of Six Brief Interventions that Target Drug-Related Problems in Correctional Populations.针对惩教人群中与药物相关问题的六种简短干预措施的评估。
J Offender Rehabil. 2012;51(1-2):9-33. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2012.633020. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
4
A Brief Assessment for HIV Risk: The TCU HVHP Form.一份针对艾滋病毒风险的简要评估:德克萨斯基督教大学艾滋病毒高风险预防(TCU HVHP)表格
J Correct Health Care. 2016 Jul;22(3):225-39. doi: 10.1177/1078345816653871.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
An item response theory analysis of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: comparing male and female probationers and prisoners.心理犯罪思维风格量表的项目反应理论分析:比较男性缓刑犯和囚犯。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):1050-5. doi: 10.1037/pas0000014. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Criminal thinking styles among people with serious mental illness in jail.监狱中患有严重精神疾病者的犯罪思维模式。
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Dec;38(6):592-601. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000084. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
8
Tried and True? A Psychometric Evaluation of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles-Short Form.屡试不爽?《犯罪思维方式心理问卷-短式》的心理计量学评估。
Assessment. 2023 Sep;30(6):1985-1997. doi: 10.1177/10731911221132500. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
9
Analyses of the TCU Drug Screen 5: Using an Item Response Theory Model with a Sample of Juvenile Justice Youth.青少年司法青年样本的德克萨斯基督教大学药物筛查5分析:使用项目反应理论模型
J Offender Rehabil. 2022;61(8):442-455. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2128153. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
The Japanese Criminal Thinking Inventory: Development, Reliability, and Initial Validation of a New Scale for Assessing Criminal Thinking in a Japanese Offender Population.《日本犯罪思维量表:一种用于评估日本犯罪人群体犯罪思维的新量表的编制、信度及初步效度验证》
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Nov;59(12):1308-21. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14533937. Epub 2014 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).饮食评估工具(EAT-10)的项目反应理论与拉施分析介绍
Brain Impair. 2018 Mar;19(Spec Iss 1):91-102. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2017.31. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
2
Effect of a brief cognitive behavioural intervention on criminal thinking and prison misconduct in male inmates: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses.简短认知行为干预对男性囚犯犯罪思维及狱中不当行为的影响:基于变量和基于个体的分析
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Dec;27(5):457-469. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2028. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Effectiveness of a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a Chance on Change.一种针对犯罪思维的自我管理干预措施的有效性:把握改变的机会。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):272-282. doi: 10.1037/ser0000079. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Evaluation of WaySafe: A Disease-Risk Reduction Curriculum for Substance-Abusing Offenders.WaySafe评估:一项针对药物滥用罪犯的疾病风险降低课程。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Nov;58:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 16.
5
Does substance misuse moderate the relationship between criminal thinking and recidivism?物质滥用是否会缓和犯罪思维与累犯之间的关系?
J Crim Justice. 2015 January-February;43(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.11.001.
6
Examining Concurrent Validity and Predictive Utility for the Addiction Severity Index and Texas Christian University (TCU) Short Forms.检验成瘾严重程度指数和德克萨斯基督教大学(TCU)简表的同时效度和预测效用。
J Offender Rehabil. 2012 Jan;51(1-2):78-95. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2012.633021. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
7
Addiction treatment outcomes, process and change: Texas Institute of Behavioral Research at Texas Christian University.成瘾治疗结果、过程和改变:德克萨斯州基督教大学德克萨斯行为研究所。
Addiction. 2011 Oct;106(10):1733-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03121.x. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
8
Relationship between drug treatment engagement and criminal thinking style among drug-using offenders.吸毒罪犯的药物治疗参与度与犯罪思维方式之间的关系。
Eur Addict Res. 2009;15(2):71-7. doi: 10.1159/000189785. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
9
Antisocial personality disorder as a predictor of criminal behaviour in a longitudinal study of a cohort of abusers of several classes of drugs: relation to type of substance and type of crime.在一项对几类毒品滥用者队列的纵向研究中,反社会人格障碍作为犯罪行为的预测因素:与毒品类型和犯罪类型的关系。
Addict Behav. 2008 Jun;33(6):799-811. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
10
A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages.治疗参与度和康复阶段的纵向评估。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004 Sep;27(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.001.

德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表(CTS)的心理测量再评估。

A psychometric reevaluation of the TCU criminal thinking scales (CTS).

作者信息

Sease Thomas B, Joe George, Pankow Jennifer, Lehman Wayne E K, Knight Kevin

机构信息

Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Offender Rehabil. 2022;61(3):135-147. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2045528. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1080/10509674.2022.2045528
PMID:35386231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8983012/
Abstract

In the United States, approximately 9 million people cycle in and out of jail and more than 600,000 people are released from prison each year. Unfortunately, the reentry process includes several barriers people must overcome (e.g., criminal thinking) to achieve adequate psychosocial functioning. As such, valid and reliable assessments that allow correctional staff to monitor clients' progress in treatment and test program effectiveness are paramount to reducing this major public safety concern. The TCU Criminal Thinking Scales (CTS) are a widely used assessment of criminal thinking in correctional settings. This study reevaluated the psychometric properties of the TCU CTS using Item Response Theory. Results showed the TCU CTS had good internal reliability and each scale loaded onto one factor. Item level analysis revealed most items adequately fit the model, generally measuring moderate levels of criminal thinking. Furthermore, several TCU CTS scales were negatively correlated with motivation for treatment and psychosocial functioning.

摘要

在美国,约900万人进出监狱,每年有超过60万人从监狱获释。不幸的是,重新融入社会的过程存在一些人们必须克服的障碍(如犯罪思维),以实现充分的心理社会功能。因此,能够让惩教人员监测客户治疗进展并检验项目有效性的有效且可靠的评估,对于减少这一重大公共安全问题至关重要。德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表(CTS)是惩教环境中广泛使用的犯罪思维评估工具。本研究使用项目反应理论重新评估了德克萨斯基督教大学CTS的心理测量特性。结果显示,德克萨斯基督教大学CTS具有良好的内部信度,且每个量表都加载到一个因子上。项目水平分析表明,大多数项目与模型拟合良好,总体上测量的是中等水平的犯罪思维。此外,德克萨斯基督教大学CTS的几个量表与治疗动机和心理社会功能呈负相关。