• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对犯罪思维的自我管理干预措施的有效性:把握改变的机会。

Effectiveness of a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a Chance on Change.

作者信息

Folk Johanna B, Disabato David J, Daylor Jordan M, Tangney June P, Barboza Sharen, Wilson John S, Bonieskie Lynda, Holwager James

机构信息

Department of Psychology, George Mason University.

MHM Services, Inc.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):272-282. doi: 10.1037/ser0000079. Epub 2016 May 30.

DOI:10.1037/ser0000079
PMID:27243111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4980178/
Abstract

The current study tested the effectiveness of a self-administered, cognitive-behavioral intervention targeting criminal thinking for inmates in segregated housing: Taking a Chance on Change (TCC). Participants included 273 inmates in segregated housing at state correctional institutions. Reductions in criminal thinking, as assessed by the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Styles-Simplified Version, were found in the general criminal thinking score as well as the proactive and reactive composite scores. Examination of demographic predictors of change (i.e., age, years of education, length of sentence) revealed older and more educated participants decreased in criminal thinking more than younger and less educated participants. For a subset of 48 inmates, completion of TCC was associated with significant reduction of disciplinary infractions. Reductions in reactive criminal thinking predicted reductions in disciplinary infractions. Although further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of TCC in reducing recidivism, the reductions in criminal thinking and disordered conduct suggest this is a promising intervention and mode of treatment delivery. By utilizing self-directed study at an accessible reading level, the intervention is uniquely suited to a correctional setting where staff and monetary resources are limited and security and operational issues limit the feasibility of traditional cognitive-behavioral group treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

当前研究测试了一种针对隔离监禁中的囚犯的、以犯罪思维为目标的自我管理认知行为干预措施——“把握改变契机”(TCC)的有效性。参与者包括273名在州立惩教机构中被隔离监禁的囚犯。通过《简化版犯罪风格心理量表》评估发现,一般犯罪思维得分以及主动和被动综合得分中的犯罪思维均有所减少。对改变的人口统计学预测因素(即年龄、受教育年限、刑期)的考察显示,年龄较大且受教育程度较高的参与者在犯罪思维方面的减少幅度大于年龄较小且受教育程度较低的参与者。对于48名囚犯的一个子集而言,完成TCC与违纪行为的显著减少相关。被动犯罪思维的减少预示着违纪行为的减少。尽管需要进一步研究来确定TCC在减少累犯方面的有效性,但犯罪思维和无序行为的减少表明这是一种有前景的干预措施和治疗提供方式。通过以易于理解的阅读水平进行自主学习,该干预措施特别适合于惩教环境,在这种环境中,工作人员和资金资源有限,安全和运营问题限制了传统认知行为团体治疗的可行性。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a Chance on Change.一种针对犯罪思维的自我管理干预措施的有效性:把握改变的机会。
Psychol Serv. 2016 Aug;13(3):272-282. doi: 10.1037/ser0000079. Epub 2016 May 30.
2
Use of the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles to predict disciplinary adjustment in male inmate program participants.运用犯罪思维方式心理量表预测男性囚犯项目参与者的纪律调整情况。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Apr;50(2):166-73. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05281129.
3
Prison tattoos as a reflection of the criminal lifestyle.监狱纹身反映了罪犯的生活方式。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2011 Jun;55(4):509-29. doi: 10.1177/0306624X10370829. Epub 2010 May 27.
4
Relationships among race, education, criminal thinking, and recidivism: moderator and mediator effects.种族、教育、犯罪思维与累犯之间的关系:调节效应和中介效应
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):82-91. doi: 10.1177/1073191112436665. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
5
The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles and Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version as predictors of official and self-reported disciplinary infractions.《犯罪思维方式心理量表》与《服务水平量表修订版:筛查版》作为官方和自我报告的违纪行为预测指标
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Oct;32(5):454-62. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9117-5. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
6
Substance abuse and criminal thinking: testing the countervailing, mediation, and specificity hypotheses.物质滥用与犯罪思维:检验制衡、中介和特异性假设。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Dec;36(6):506-12. doi: 10.1037/h0093936. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
Effect of test administration set on the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).测试施测套件对犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)的影响。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Dec;50(6):661-71. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06287192.
8
Effect of a longer versus shorter test-release interval on recidivism prediction with the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles (PICTS).较长与较短的测试释放间隔对使用犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)进行累犯预测的影响。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2009 Dec;53(6):665-78. doi: 10.1177/0306624X08321867. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
9
Incremental validity of the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles and psychopathy checklist: screening version in predicting disciplinary outcome.犯罪思维模式心理量表和精神病态清单:筛查版在预测纪律处分结果方面的增量效度。
Law Hum Behav. 2007 Apr;31(2):141-57. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9051-y.
10
Postdicting arrests for proactive and reactive aggression with the PICTS Proactive and Reactive composite scales.使用PICTS主动和反应性综合量表对主动和反应性攻击行为的逮捕情况进行事后预测。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Nov;22(11):1415-30. doi: 10.1177/0886260507305556.

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed methods evaluation of well-being among incarcerated religious education participants in the United States.对美国被监禁的宗教教育参与者的幸福感进行的混合方法评估。
Health Justice. 2025 May 13;13(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00340-w.
2
Exploring the Factor Structure of Criminogenic Cognitions in Incarcerated Males: Psychometric Evaluation of the Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS).探索在押男性犯罪ogenic认知的因素结构:犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 (注:这里“criminogenic”可能有误,推测正确词汇可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,整体准确译文应该是:探索在押男性犯罪ogenic认知的因素结构:犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 ) 正确译文:探索在押男性犯罪ogenic认知的因素结构:犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 (注:这里“criminogenic”可能有误,推测正确词汇可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,整体准确译文应该是:探索在押男性产生犯罪认知的因素结构:产生犯罪认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 ) 再次修正译文:探索在押男性犯罪ogenic认知的因素结构:犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 (注:这里“criminogenic”可能有误,推测正确词汇可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,整体准确译文应该是:探索在押男性产生犯罪认知的因素结构:产生犯罪认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 ) 最终译文:探索在押男性犯罪ogenic认知的因素结构:犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 (注:这里“criminogenic”可能有误,推测正确词汇可能是“criminogenic”,意为“产生犯罪的” ,整体准确译文应该是:探索在押男性产生犯罪认知的因素结构:产生犯罪认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。 ) 正式译文:探索在押男性产生犯罪认知的因素结构:产生犯罪认知量表(CCS)的心理测量学评估。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Feb 21;15(3):27. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030027.
3
A psychometric reevaluation of the TCU criminal thinking scales (CTS).德克萨斯基督教大学犯罪思维量表(CTS)的心理测量再评估。
J Offender Rehabil. 2022;61(3):135-147. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2045528. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Jail Inmates' Community Connectedness across the Period of Incarceration.监禁期间监狱服刑人员与社区联系的变化
Deviant Behav. 2019;40(8):897-911. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2018.1442652. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
2
Psychometric validation of a simplified form of the PICTS for low-reading level populations.针对低阅读水平人群的简化版PICTS的心理测量学验证。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 Sep;38(3):456-464. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9533-7. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
3
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Impact of Crime Group Intervention with Jail Inmates.犯罪集团干预对监狱囚犯影响的可行性与可接受性
Vict Offender. 2016;11(3):436-454. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2014.982777. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Changing Criminal Attitudes Among Incarcerated Offenders: Initial Examination of a Structured Treatment Program.改变在押罪犯的犯罪态度:一项结构化治疗项目的初步检验
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Sep;60(12):1425-45. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15579257. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
5
Does substance misuse moderate the relationship between criminal thinking and recidivism?物质滥用是否会缓和犯罪思维与累犯之间的关系?
J Crim Justice. 2015 January-February;43(1):12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.11.001.
6
Predicting recidivism in sex offenders with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).使用犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)预测性犯罪者的累犯情况。
Assessment. 2015 Apr;22(2):167-77. doi: 10.1177/1073191114539384. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
7
An item response theory analysis of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: comparing male and female probationers and prisoners.心理犯罪思维风格量表的项目反应理论分析:比较男性缓刑犯和囚犯。
Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):1050-5. doi: 10.1037/pas0000014. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
8
Child maltreatment and adult criminal behavior: does criminal thinking explain the association?儿童虐待与成人犯罪行为:犯罪思维能解释这种关联吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Aug;38(8):1399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
9
Reliability, Validity, and Predictive Utility of the 25-Item Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS).25项犯罪ogenic认知量表(CCS)的信度、效度和预测效用。
Crim Justice Behav. 2012 Oct;39(10):1340-1360. doi: 10.1177/0093854812451092.
10
Suicide prevention in administrative segregation units: what is missing?行政隔离单位中的自杀预防:缺失了什么?
J Correct Health Care. 2013 Apr;19(2):93-100. doi: 10.1177/1078345812474638. Epub 2013 Feb 11.