Bedson Carlos P E, Wheeler Philip M, Reid Neil, Harris Wilson Edwin, Mallon David, Caporn Simon, Preziosi Richard
Department of Natural Sciences Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.
School of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences The Open University Milton Keynes UK.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Mar 31;12(4):e8744. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8744. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Over the last 20 years, ecological restoration of degraded habitats has become common in conservation practice. Mountain hares () were surveyed during 2017-2021 using 830 km of line transects in the Peak District National Park, England. Historically degraded bog areas were previously reported having low hare numbers. Following bog restoration, we found hare densities of 32.6 individuals km, notably higher than neighboring degraded (unrestored) bog with 24.4 hares km. Hare density on restored peatland was 2.7 times higher than on bogs managed for grouse shooting at 12.2 hares km and 3.3 times higher than on heather moorland managed for grouse shooting at 10.0 hares km. Yearly estimates varied most on habitats managed for grouse, perhaps indicative of the impact of habitat management, for example, heather burning and/or possible hare culling to control potential tick-borne louping ill virus in gamebirds. Acid grassland used for sheep farming had a similar density to grouse moorland at 11.8 hares km. Unmanaged dwarf shrub heath had the lowest density at 4.8 hares km. Hare populations are characterized by significant yearly fluctuations, those in the study area increasing by 60% between 2017 and 2018 before declining by . 15% by 2020 and remaining stable to 2021. During an earlier survey in 2002, total abundance throughout the Peak District National Park was estimated at 3361 (95% CI: 2431-4612) hares. The present study estimated 3562 (2291-5624) hares suggesting a stable population over the last two decades despite fluctuations likely influenced by weather and anthropogenic factors. Mountain hares in the Peak District favored bog habitats and were associated with restored peatland habitat. Wildlife management should be cognizant of hare density variation between habitats, which may have implications for local extinction risk.
在过去20年里,退化栖息地的生态恢复在保护实践中已变得很常见。2017年至2021年期间,在英格兰峰区国家公园使用830公里的样线对山地野兔()进行了调查。历史上退化的沼泽地区此前报告野兔数量较少。沼泽恢复后,我们发现野兔密度为每平方公里32.6只,明显高于相邻退化(未恢复)沼泽的每平方公里24.4只。恢复后的泥炭地野兔密度比用于松鸡狩猎管理的沼泽地(每平方公里12.2只)高2.7倍,比用于松鸡狩猎管理的石南荒地(每平方公里10.0只)高3.3倍。每年的估计数在用于松鸡狩猎管理的栖息地变化最大,这可能表明栖息地管理的影响,例如石南焚烧和/或可能为控制猎禽中潜在的蜱传跳跃病病毒而进行的野兔捕杀。用于养羊的酸性草原密度与松鸡荒地相似,为每平方公里11.8只。未管理的矮灌木石南荒地密度最低,为每平方公里4.8只。野兔种群的特点是每年有显著波动,研究区域内的野兔数量在2017年至2018年期间增加了60%,到2020年下降了15%,并在2021年保持稳定。在2002年的一次早期调查中,整个峰区国家公园的总数量估计为3361只(95%置信区间:2431 - 4612只)野兔。本研究估计有3562只(2291 - 5624只)野兔,这表明尽管可能受到天气和人为因素的波动影响,但在过去二十年里野兔种群数量稳定。峰区的山地野兔偏爱沼泽栖息地,并与恢复后的泥炭地栖息地有关。野生动物管理应认识到不同栖息地之间野兔密度的差异,这可能对当地灭绝风险产生影响。