• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术后被遗忘的关节评分中的患者可接受症状状态。

The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Singh Vivek, Bieganowski Thomas, Huang Shengnan, Karia Raj, Davidovitch Roy I, Schwarzkopf Ran

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2022 Apr;3(4):307-313. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.34.BJO-2022-0010.R1.

DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.34.BJO-2022-0010.R1
PMID:35387474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9044089/
Abstract

AIMS

The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is the minimum cut-off value that corresponds to a patient's satisfactory state-of-health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been previously demonstrated, the PASS has yet to be clearly defined. This study aims to define the PASS of the FJS-12 following primary THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary elective THA from 2019 to 2020, and answered both the FJS-12 and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) questionnaires one-year postoperatively. HOOS, JR score was used as the anchor to estimate the PASS of FJS-12. Two statistical methods were employed: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point, which maximized the Youden index; and 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the HOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value.

RESULTS

This study included 780 patients. The mean one-year FJS-12 score was 65.42 (SD 28.59). The mean one-year HOOS, JR score was 82.70 (SD 16.57). A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and HOOS, JR was found (r = 0.74; p<0.001), making the HOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 66.68 (area under the curve = 0.8). The cut-off score value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.20.

CONCLUSION

The PASS threshold for the FJS-12 at one year following primary THA was 66.68 and 92.20 using the ROC curve and 75th percentile approaches, respectively. These values can be used to achieve consensus about meaningful postoperative improvement to maximize the utility of the FJS-12 to evaluate and counsel patients undergoing THA. Cite this article:  2022;3(4):307-313.

摘要

目的

遗忘关节评分-12(FJS-12)是一种经过验证的患者报告结局测量(PROM)工具,旨在评估全髋关节置换术(THA)后日常活动期间的人工假体感知情况。患者可接受症状状态(PASS)是对应于患者健康满意状态的最小临界值。尽管FJS-12的有效性和可靠性先前已得到证实,但PASS尚未明确界定。本研究旨在确定初次THA后FJS-12的PASS。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2019年至2020年接受初次择期THA的所有患者,并在术后一年回答了FJS-12和髋关节残疾与骨关节炎结局评分、关节置换(HOOS,JR)问卷。HOOS,JR评分用作锚定指标来估计FJS-12的PASS。采用了两种统计方法:使约登指数最大化的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线点;以及HOOS,JR评分差异大于临界值的患者累积百分比曲线的第75百分位数。

结果

本研究纳入780例患者。术后一年FJS-12的平均评分为65.42(标准差28.59)。术后一年HOOS,JR的平均评分为82.70(标准差16.57)。发现FJS-12与HOOS,JR之间存在高度正相关(r = 0.74;p<0.001),这使得HOOS,JR成为有效的外部锚定指标。使检测PASS的敏感性和特异性最大化时FJS-12的阈值评分为66.68(曲线下面积 = 0.8)。采用第75百分位数法计算的临界评分为92.20。

结论

初次THA后一年,使用ROC曲线法和第75百分位数法时FJS-12的PASS阈值分别为66.68和92.20。这些值可用于就有意义的术后改善达成共识,以最大限度地利用FJS-12来评估和咨询接受THA的患者。引用本文:2022;3(4):307-313。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5824/9044089/f20b502d32c6/BJO-3-307-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5824/9044089/f20b502d32c6/BJO-3-307-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5824/9044089/f20b502d32c6/BJO-3-307-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后被遗忘的关节评分中的患者可接受症状状态。
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Apr;3(4):307-313. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.34.BJO-2022-0010.R1.
2
Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后遗忘关节评分的患者可接受症状状态。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1557-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.069. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
3
Defining Patient-relevant Thresholds and Change Scores for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR Anchored on the Patient-acceptable Symptom State Question.定义与患者相关的 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 阈值和变化分数,以患者可接受的症状状态问题为基础。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Apr 1;482(4):688-698. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002857. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
Changes and thresholds in the Forgotten Joint Score after total hip arthroplasty : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state.全髋关节置换术后被遗忘关节评分的变化和阈值:最小临床重要差异、最小有意义和可检测变化以及患者可接受的症状状态。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1759-1765. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B12.BJJ-2021-0384.R1.
5
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score.单髁膝关节置换术:遗忘关节评分的最小重要差异和患者可接受症状状态
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 1;57(4):324. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040324.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12.全髋关节置换术:遗忘关节评分 12 的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052267.
7
What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?全膝关节置换术后 HOOS 和 KOOS 及 JR 版本的最小和实质性改善是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2432-2441. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000456.
8
Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.比较在退伍军人事务部医院接受择期全髋关节或全膝关节置换术的退伍军人患者报告的结局测量中确定最小临床重要差异的方法。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):404-411. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024.
9
Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the HOOS JR and KOOS JR After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.定义初次全膝关节置换术后 HOOS JR 和 KOOS JR 的患者可接受症状状态。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Feb 16;104(4):345-352. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00550.
10
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后髋关节障碍和骨关节炎结果评分中最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的诊断特异性阈值是什么?
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1783-1788.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior hip arthroscopy impacts long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty : a propensity-matched study with a minimum ten-year follow-up.既往髋关节镜检查对全髋关节置换术的长期疗效有影响:一项至少十年随访的倾向匹配研究。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Sep 3;6(9):1022-1030. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.69.BJO-2025-0064.
2
The Effect of the Design of Polyethylene Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes.全膝关节置换术中聚乙烯内衬设计对患者报告结局的影响。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 May 8;9(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00075. eCollection 2025 May 1.
3
Effect of Early Postoperative Gait Parameters After Total Hip Arthroplasty on Forgotten Joint Score-12 at 2-Year Follow-Up.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes and thresholds in the Forgotten Joint Score after total hip arthroplasty : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state.全髋关节置换术后被遗忘关节评分的变化和阈值:最小临床重要差异、最小有意义和可检测变化以及患者可接受的症状状态。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1759-1765. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B12.BJJ-2021-0384.R1.
2
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score.单髁膝关节置换术:遗忘关节评分的最小重要差异和患者可接受症状状态
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 1;57(4):324. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040324.
3
全髋关节置换术后早期步态参数对2年随访时遗忘关节评分-12的影响。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2025 Jan 6;10(1):7. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics10010007.
4
Direct anterior and direct lateral approach in patients with femoral neck fractures receiving a total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折患者的直接前路与直接外侧入路:一项随机对照试验
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jan 13;96:73-79. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.42847.
5
Direct anterior approach with conventional instruments versus robotic posterolateral approach in elective total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a case-control study.直接前方入路联合传统器械与机器人后外侧入路在原发性骨关节炎初次全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 21;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00753-7.
6
Total Hip Arthroplasty through Direct Anterior Approach in a Patient with Ipsilateral Knee Arthrodesis: A Case Report.同侧膝关节融合患者经直接前路行全髋关节置换术:一例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2023 Jan;13(1):81-86. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i01.3524.
7
Relationship Between Preoperative Psoas Major Muscle Quality and Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后患者术前腰大肌质量与遗忘关节评分-12之间的关系
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Mar 7;20:101118. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101118. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12.
全髋关节置换术:遗忘关节评分 12 的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052267.
4
Is There an Association Between Negative Patient-Experience Comments and Perioperative Outcomes After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?初次全髋关节置换术后患者负面体验评论与围手术期结局是否存在关联?
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2016-2023. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
Relationships between early postoperative gait biomechanical factors and patient-reported outcome measures 6 months after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后6个月时早期术后步态生物力学因素与患者报告结局指标之间的关系。
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
How is quality of life after total hip replacement related to the reconstructed anatomy? A study with low-dose stereoradiography.全髋关节置换术后的生活质量与重建解剖结构有何关系?一项低剂量体层摄影研究。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021 Feb;102(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
7
Patient-acceptable symptom state for the Oxford Hip Score and Forgotten Joint Score at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years following total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study of 597 cases.全髋关节置换术后 3 个月、1 年和 2 年时,Oxford 髋关节评分和被遗忘关节评分的患者可接受症状状态:基于注册的 597 例研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Aug;91(4):372-377. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1750877. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Determining the Validity, Reliability, and Utility of the Forgotten Joint Score: A Systematic Review.确定被遗忘关节评分的有效性、可靠性和实用性:系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1137-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.058. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Can We Help Patients Forget Their Joint? Determining a Threshold for Successful Outcome for the Forgotten Joint Score.能否帮助患者忘却关节?确定“被遗忘关节评分”成功结局的阈值。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jan;35(1):153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
Differences in case mix and outcomes between Swiss and Scottish total knee arthroplasty patients.瑞士和苏格兰全膝关节置换术患者的病例组合和结局差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1797-1804. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05597-x. Epub 2019 Jul 2.