• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在模型实施时,通过定量预测误差分析来研究预测变量测量异质性情况下的预测性能。

Quantitative prediction error analysis to investigate predictive performance under predictor measurement heterogeneity at model implementation.

作者信息

Luijken Kim, Song Jia, Groenwold Rolf H H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00121-1.

DOI:10.1186/s41512-022-00121-1
PMID:35387683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8988417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When a predictor variable is measured in similar ways at the derivation and validation setting of a prognostic prediction model, yet both differ from the intended use of the model in practice (i.e., "predictor measurement heterogeneity"), performance of the model at implementation needs to be inferred. This study proposed an analysis to quantify the impact of anticipated predictor measurement heterogeneity.

METHODS

A simulation study was conducted to assess the impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across validation and implementation setting in time-to-event outcome data. The use of the quantitative prediction error analysis was illustrated using an example of predicting the 6-year risk of developing type 2 diabetes with heterogeneity in measurement of the predictor body mass index.

RESULTS

In the simulation study, calibration-in-the-large of prediction models was poor and overall accuracy was reduced in all scenarios of predictor measurement heterogeneity. Model discrimination decreased with increasing random predictor measurement heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity of predictor measurements across settings of validation and implementation reduced predictive performance at implementation of prognostic models with a time-to-event outcome. When validating a prognostic model, the targeted clinical setting needs to be considered and analyses can be conducted to quantify the impact of anticipated predictor measurement heterogeneity on model performance at implementation.

摘要

背景

当在预后预测模型的推导和验证设置中以相似方式测量预测变量,但两者在实际应用中均与模型的预期用途不同时(即“预测变量测量异质性”),需要推断模型在实施时的性能。本研究提出了一种分析方法,以量化预期的预测变量测量异质性的影响。

方法

进行了一项模拟研究,以评估预测变量测量异质性在事件发生时间结局数据的验证和实施设置中的影响。通过一个预测体重指数测量存在异质性的情况下2型糖尿病6年发病风险的例子,说明了定量预测误差分析的应用。

结果

在模拟研究中,在预测变量测量异质性的所有情况下,预测模型的大样本校准均较差,总体准确性降低。随着随机预测变量测量异质性的增加,模型辨别力下降。

结论

验证和实施设置之间预测变量测量的异质性降低了具有事件发生时间结局的预后模型在实施时的预测性能。在验证预后模型时,需要考虑目标临床设置,并可进行分析以量化预期的预测变量测量异质性对模型实施性能的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/8dd07908b7ee/41512_2022_121_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/89acdad81983/41512_2022_121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/570ce16b970b/41512_2022_121_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/8dd07908b7ee/41512_2022_121_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/89acdad81983/41512_2022_121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/570ce16b970b/41512_2022_121_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90df/8988417/8dd07908b7ee/41512_2022_121_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative prediction error analysis to investigate predictive performance under predictor measurement heterogeneity at model implementation.在模型实施时,通过定量预测误差分析来研究预测变量测量异质性情况下的预测性能。
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00121-1.
2
Impact of predictor measurement heterogeneity across settings on the performance of prediction models: A measurement error perspective.预测指标在不同环境下的变异性对预测模型性能的影响:测量误差的角度。
Stat Med. 2019 Aug 15;38(18):3444-3459. doi: 10.1002/sim.8183. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Changing predictor measurement procedures affected the performance of prediction models in clinical examples.改变预测变量的测量方法会影响临床实例中预测模型的性能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
4
How variation in predictor measurement affects the discriminative ability and transportability of a prediction model.预测指标测量的变化如何影响预测模型的判别能力和可转移性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
5
There is no such thing as a validated prediction model.没有经过验证的预测模型这种东西。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w.
6
A prognostic model, including quantitative fetal fibronectin, to predict preterm labour: the QUIDS meta-analysis and prospective cohort study.包含定量胎儿纤维连接蛋白的预测早产模型:QUIDS 荟萃分析和前瞻性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(52):1-168. doi: 10.3310/hta25520.
7
Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.用于识别急性踝关节扭伤患者不良结局风险的预测模型:SPRAINED 研究的开发和外部验证。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(64):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22640.
8
Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.2 型糖尿病患者肾病预测模型的性能:系统评价和外部验证研究。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 28;374:n2134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2134.
9
Review and evaluation of performance measures for survival prediction models in external validation settings.外部验证环境下生存预测模型性能指标的回顾与评估
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0336-2.
10
Meta-analysis of prediction model performance across multiple studies: Which scale helps ensure between-study normality for the C-statistic and calibration measures?多项研究中预测模型性能的荟萃分析:哪种尺度有助于确保 C 统计量和校准测量的研究间正态性?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):3505-3522. doi: 10.1177/0962280217705678. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Thick Data Analytics (TDA): An Iterative and Inductive Framework for Algorithmic Improvement.厚数据分析(TDA):一种用于算法改进的迭代归纳框架。
Am Stat. 2024;78(4):456-464. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2024.2327535. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Framework for personalized prediction of treatment response in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a replication study in independent data.复发缓解型多发性硬化症个体化治疗反应预测框架:独立数据的复制研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02264-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual participant data meta-analysis for external validation, recalibration, and updating of a flexible parametric prognostic model.个体参与者数据荟萃分析用于灵活参数预后模型的外部验证、重新校准和更新。
Stat Med. 2021 Jun 15;40(13):3066-3084. doi: 10.1002/sim.8959. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S15-S33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002.
3
Accuracy of self-reported BMI using objective measurement in high school students.高中生自我报告 BMI 与客观测量值的准确性。
J Nutr Sci. 2020 Aug 12;9:e35. doi: 10.1017/jns.2020.28. eCollection 2020.
4
Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models.预测与因果推断:治疗在临床预测模型中的作用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;35(7):619-630. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00636-1. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.STRATOS 观察性流行病学中变量测量误差和分类错误的指导文件:第 1 部分-基本理论和简单调整方法。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 20;39(16):2197-2231. doi: 10.1002/sim.8532. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.STRATOS关于观察性流行病学中变量测量误差和错误分类的指南文件:第2部分 - 更复杂的调整方法和高级主题。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 20;39(16):2232-2263. doi: 10.1002/sim.8531. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Temporal recalibration for improving prognostic model development and risk predictions in settings where survival is improving over time.用于在生存随时间改善的情况下改进预后模型开发和风险预测的时间重新校准。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 1;49(4):1316-1325. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa030.
8
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
9
Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics.校准:预测分析的阿喀琉斯之踵。
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 16;17(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7.
10
Changing predictor measurement procedures affected the performance of prediction models in clinical examples.改变预测变量的测量方法会影响临床实例中预测模型的性能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 9.