Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2022 Jun;45(6):1001-1007. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00899-z.
Pulse transit time (PTT), which refers to the travel time between two arterial sites within the same cardiac cycle, has been developed as a novel cuffless form of continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in BP parameters, including BP variability, between those assessed by beat-to-beat PTT-estimated BP (eBP) and those assessed by intermittent PTT-estimated BP at fixed time intervals (eBP) in patients suspected of having sleep disordered breathing (SDB). In 330 patients with SDB (average age, 66.8 ± 11.9 years; 3% oxygen desaturation index [ODI], 21.0 ± 15.0/h) from 8 institutes, PTT-estimated BP was continuously recorded during the nighttime. The average systolic eBP, maximum systolic and diastolic eBP, standard deviation (SD) of systolic and diastolic eBP, and coefficient variation (CV) of systolic and diastolic eBP were higher than the respective values of eBP (all P < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between eBP and eBP in average systolic BP and SD and CV of systolic BP, while there were disagreements in both minimum and maximum values of eBP and eBP in patients with high systolic BP (P < 0.05). Although systolic BP variability incrementally increased according to the tertiles of 3%ODI in both eBP and eBP (all P < 0.05), there was no difference in this tendency between eBP and eBP. In patients with suspected SDB, the difference between eBP and eBP was minimal, and there were disagreements regarding both the minimum and maximum BP. However, there were agreements in regard to the index of BP variability between eBP and eBP.
脉搏传输时间 (PTT) 是指同一心动周期内两个动脉部位之间的传输时间,它已被开发为一种新的无袖带连续血压 (BP) 监测形式。本研究旨在调查在疑似睡眠呼吸障碍 (SDB) 患者中,通过逐拍 PTT 估计 BP (eBP) 和通过固定时间间隔 PTT 估计 BP (eBP) 评估的 BP 参数,包括 BP 变异性的差异。在 8 家机构的 330 名 SDB 患者 (平均年龄 66.8±11.9 岁;3%氧减指数 [ODI] 21.0±15.0/h) 中,在夜间连续记录 PTT 估计 BP。平均收缩期 eBP、最大收缩期和舒张期 eBP、收缩期和舒张期 eBP 的标准差 (SD)、收缩期和舒张期 eBP 的变异系数 (CV) 均高于相应的 eBP 值 (均 P<0.05)。Bland-Altman 分析显示,eBP 与 eBP 在平均收缩压和收缩压 SD 和 CV 方面具有良好的一致性,而在 eBP 和 eBP 的最低和最高值方面存在差异,且在收缩压较高的患者中存在差异 (均 P<0.05)。尽管在 eBP 和 eBP 中,根据 3%ODI 的三分位,收缩压变异性逐渐增加 (均 P<0.05),但在这两个参数之间,这种趋势没有差异。在疑似 SDB 的患者中,eBP 与 eBP 之间的差异最小,在最低和最高 BP 方面存在分歧。然而,在 eBP 与 eBP 之间的 BP 变异性指数方面存在一致性。