• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在辅助生殖技术治疗中优化培养基渗透压。

How to optimize culture media osmolality during Assisted Reproductive Technologies treatments.

机构信息

Centro de Medicina Reprodutiva - ORIGEN, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Mar 30;27(1):35-40. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210123.

DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20210123
PMID:35389044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10065773/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare the osmolality in sequential and single step culture media, used for in vitro human embryo culture, covered with mineral oil and paraffin, in dry and humid incubators.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study. A total of 120 Petri dishes, with 960 droplets of culture media, were evaluated. Each dish was prepared with 4 droplets of single step medium and sequential medium. Sixty dishes were covered with mineral oil and 60 with paraffin oil. Half were incubated in a dry incubator and half in a humid. Osmolality was measured on days 1, 3, 5, 7. ANOVA test was performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Osmolality results for single step and sequential medium, that were covered with both mineral and paraffin oil and placed in the dry incubator, significantly increased throughout the study time (D7>D5>D3). In the humid incubator, the results were similar for all periods. Osmolality was significantly lower in humid incubator, in all periods, when droplets were covered with both oils. When both culture media were placed in the humid incubator, no variation was detected, using both oils. However, when single step medium was placed in the dry incubator, covered with mineral oil, we observed a higher osmolality than the covered with paraffin oil.

CONCLUSIONS

TWe can conclude that humid incubator is better for maintaining osmolality and paraffin oil protect single step media from evaporation in dry incubator.

摘要

目的

我们的研究目的是比较覆盖矿物油和石蜡的用于体外人类胚胎培养的连续和一步法培养基在干燥和加湿孵育器中的渗透压。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。共评估了 120 个培养皿,共 960 滴培养介质。每个培养皿用 4 滴一步法培养基和连续法培养基制备。60 个培养皿用矿物油覆盖,60 个用石蜡油覆盖。一半在干燥孵育器中孵育,另一半在加湿孵育器中孵育。在第 1、3、5、7 天测量渗透压。采用方差分析进行统计学分析。

结果

在整个研究期间,覆盖矿物油和石蜡油且置于干燥孵育器中的一步法和连续法培养基的渗透压结果均显著升高(D7>D5>D3)。在加湿孵育器中,所有时期的结果均相似。在所有时期,当滴度覆盖两种油时,加湿孵育器中的渗透压显著较低。当两种培养基均置于加湿孵育器中时,使用两种油均未检测到变化。然而,当一步法培养基置于干燥孵育器并用矿物油覆盖时,我们观察到比用石蜡油覆盖时的渗透压更高。

结论

我们可以得出结论,加湿孵育器更有利于维持渗透压,并且石蜡油可防止干燥孵育器中一步法培养基蒸发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/8048ade40f14/jbra-27-01-0035-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/0986fbdc6d31/jbra-27-01-0035-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/0b3740abc0bd/jbra-27-01-0035-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/8048ade40f14/jbra-27-01-0035-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/0986fbdc6d31/jbra-27-01-0035-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/0b3740abc0bd/jbra-27-01-0035-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c6d/10065773/8048ade40f14/jbra-27-01-0035-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
How to optimize culture media osmolality during Assisted Reproductive Technologies treatments.如何在辅助生殖技术治疗中优化培养基渗透压。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2023 Mar 30;27(1):35-40. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210123.
2
[Impact of the type of incubator (non-humidified versus humidified) on embryo culture media osmolality].[培养箱类型(非加湿型与加湿型)对胚胎培养基渗透压的影响]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Jun;49(6):522-528. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Factors of the human embryo culture system that may affect media evaporation and osmolality.可能影响胚胎培养液蒸发和渗透压的人类胚胎培养系统因素。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):605-613. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa370.
4
Unstable osmolality of microdrops cultured in non-humidified incubators.非加湿培养箱中培养的微滴渗透压不稳定。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Aug;36(8):1571-1577. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01515-9. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Successful pig embryonic development in vitro outside a CO2 gas-regulated incubator: effects of pH and osmolality.在无二氧化碳气体调节培养箱的体外环境中实现猪胚胎的成功发育:pH值和渗透压的影响
Theriogenology. 2006 Mar 1;65(4):860-9. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
6
A propensity score-based, comparative study assessing humid and dry time-lapse incubation, with single-step medium, on embryo development and clinical outcomes.一项基于倾向评分的比较研究,评估了使用单步培养基的湿和干延时培养对胚胎发育和临床结局的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Aug 25;37(9):1980-1993. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac165.
7
Impact of culture media pre-equilibration methods on embryo development.培养皿预平衡方法对胚胎发育的影响。
Reprod Biol. 2024 Sep;24(3):100897. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2024.100897. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
Effect of evaporation-induced osmotic changes in culture media in a dry-type incubator on clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.干式培养箱中培养基蒸发诱导的渗透压变化对体外受精-胚胎移植周期临床结局的影响
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2020 Dec;47(4):284-292. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2020.03552. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Toward a predictive theoretical model for osmolality rise with non-humidified incubation: a randomized, multivariate response-surface study.针对非加湿孵育时渗透压升高的预测理论模型:一项随机、多变量响应面研究。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1230-1241. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab015.
10
Controversies in ART: considerations and risks for uninterrupted embryo culture.ART 相关争议:胚胎连续培养的考虑因素和风险
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Jul;39(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental Stress-Induced Alterations in Embryo Developmental Morphokinetics.环境应激诱导的胚胎发育形态动力学改变。
J Xenobiot. 2024 Oct 21;14(4):1613-1637. doi: 10.3390/jox14040087.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversies in ART: can the IVF laboratory influence preimplantation embryo aneuploidy?ART 相关争议:体外受精实验室能否影响胚胎植入前的非整倍体?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Oct;39(4):599-607. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
2
The composition of human preimplantation embryo culture media and their stability during storage and culture.人类胚胎植入前培养液的组成及其在储存和培养过程中的稳定性。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Aug 1;34(8):1450-1461. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez102.
3
Unstable osmolality of microdrops cultured in non-humidified incubators.
非加湿培养箱中培养的微滴渗透压不稳定。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Aug;36(8):1571-1577. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01515-9. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Comparison between paraffin and mineral oil covering on early human embryo culture: a prospective randomized study.石蜡与矿物油覆盖用于早期人类胚胎培养的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019 Feb;65(1):81-86. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1492645. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
5
The overlaying oil type influences in vitro embryo production: differences in composition and compound transfer into incubation medium between oils.覆层油类型对体外胚胎生产有影响:油的组成和化合物向培养介质中的转移存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10505. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10989-5.
6
Single versus sequential culture medium: which is better at improving ongoing pregnancy rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis.单一培养基与序贯培养基:哪种在提高持续妊娠率方面更具优势?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;21(3):240-246. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170045.
7
Humid versus dry incubator: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.湿化与干燥孵化器:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Aug;108(2):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.036. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
8
Impact of the IVF laboratory environment on human preimplantation embryo phenotype.体外受精实验室环境对人类植入前胚胎表型的影响。
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017 Aug;8(4):418-435. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000368. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.临床体外受精中使用单一培养基与序贯培养基进行囊胚培养:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Oct;33(10):1261-1272. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0774-5. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Live births achieved via IVF are increased by improvements in air quality and laboratory environment.通过体外受精实现的活产数量会因空气质量和实验室环境的改善而增加。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Sep;31(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 May 8.