Suppr超能文献

疑似接触霉菌的患者应进行哪些检测?血清学标志物在诊断中的实用性。

What should be tested in patients with suspected mold exposure? Usefulness of serological markers for the diagnosis.

作者信息

Kespohl Sabine, Liebers Verena, Maryska Silke, Meurer Ursula, Litzenberger Claudia, Merget Rolf, Raulf Monika

机构信息

Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Allergol Select. 2022 Mar 29;6:118-132. doi: 10.5414/ALX02298E. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The associations of mold exposure, IgE-mediated sensitization, inflammatory markers, and respiratory symptoms were analyzed in 46 exposed and 23 non-exposed individuals. Both exposure and clinical symptoms were assessed by questionnaire. Specific (s)IgE to mold mixture (mx1) was significantly higher and found more frequently in exposed (41%) than non-exposed individuals (17%), which was not observed for sIgG to mold mix (Gmx6). Notably, exposed asthmatics were more frequently sensitized to molds (55%) compared to exposed non-asthmatics (18%). In addition, the serum concentrations of club cell protein (CC16) were significantly lower in exposed subjects, especially in asthmatics. Positive associations were observed among mold sensitization, asthma, and mold exposure, but not in subjects with predominantly environmental sensitizations without mold sensitization. Thus, sIgE to mx1 but not sIgG to Gmx6 is a useful diagnostic marker to verify mold-associated respiratory symptoms.

摘要

对46名暴露个体和23名未暴露个体分析了霉菌暴露、IgE介导的致敏反应、炎症标志物和呼吸道症状之间的关联。暴露情况和临床症状均通过问卷调查进行评估。针对霉菌混合物(mx1)的特异性(s)IgE在暴露个体(41%)中显著更高且更常见,而在未暴露个体中为17%,针对霉菌混合物的sIgG(Gmx6)则未观察到这种情况。值得注意的是,与暴露的非哮喘患者(18%)相比,暴露的哮喘患者对霉菌致敏的频率更高(55%)。此外,暴露个体,尤其是哮喘患者,其克拉拉细胞蛋白(CC16)的血清浓度显著较低。在霉菌致敏、哮喘和霉菌暴露之间观察到正相关,但在主要为环境致敏而非霉菌致敏的个体中未观察到。因此,针对mx1的sIgE而非针对Gmx6的sIgG是验证与霉菌相关的呼吸道症状的有用诊断标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验