Sirdifield Coral, Denney David, Marples Rebecca, Brooker Charlie
School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
School of Law, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK.
Br J Community Justice. 2019 Nov 20;15(2):41-58.
This article critically reflects on the methodological approach used in a multi-method study of healthcare provision for probation service clients in England. The study involved gathering data from a range of large criminal justice and health organisations. Drawing on the literature and using learning from this study as an example, we address two central questions which evolved during the research: why was it more difficult to gain access in some organisations than others, and what methodological strategies might best improve engagement with research in the future? We discuss gatekeeping, and the impact of organisational resources, culture, responsibilities, change and objectives on engagement with research. We make recommendations for future methodological approaches to address these challenges, which are relevant to researchers in any discipline trying to engage organisations in research.
本文批判性地反思了在一项针对英格兰缓刑服务对象医疗保健服务的多方法研究中所采用的方法。该研究涉及从一系列大型刑事司法和卫生组织收集数据。借鉴相关文献并以本研究所得经验为例,我们探讨了研究过程中出现的两个核心问题:为何在某些组织中获取数据比在其他组织中更困难,以及未来哪些方法策略可能最有助于改善与研究的合作?我们讨论了把关问题,以及组织资源、文化、职责、变革和目标对研究合作的影响。我们针对应对这些挑战的未来方法提出了建议,这些建议对任何试图让组织参与研究的学科领域的研究人员都具有参考价值。