Grelier Armand, Guerin Olivia, Levavasseur Fathia, Caillot Frédérique, Benichou Jacques, Caron François
CHU Rouen, Department of Infectious Diseases, F-76000, Rouen, France.
CHU Rouen, Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, F-76000, Rouen, France.
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 7;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00860-y.
We aimed to assess the personal and professional quality of life changes among health care workers of different professions during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large French university hospital. Other published data originated from countries with different health care systems and outbreak dynamics.
All health care workers from our hospital were invited to fill-in an anonymous e-questionnaire of 71 questions regarding perceived personal, professional and overall quality of life before and during the first COVID-19 wave, general profile, occupation and job characteristics, change of assignment, COVID-care features if relevant, general perception during the first wave, and personal experience of being encouraged or stigmatised.
There were 794 participants, with a majority of nursing professionals (n = 416, 56%), including 57 nurse managers, 243 nurses, and 116 nurse assistants. Other participants were physicians (n = 188) and other health care staff (n = 140). Before the crisis, professional quality of life was low (6.5 on a 10-point scale) overall. The personal quality of life was higher (8.1) particularly for physicians and nurse managers. The COVID crisis saw a marked decrease in the personal quality of life (- 1.7), more pronounced in younger health care workers. Professional quality of life was less affected (- 0.4) and stayed almost constant for physicians. Staff in COVID units had a more positive perception of the crisis but experienced more fatigue, which resulted in similar quality of life levels in COVID and non-COVID units. Encouragements originated more often from relatives or colleagues than hospital managers and were exceptionally common: 63.4% of all participants, from 50.5% for other staff to 71.3% for physicians (p = 0.0005). Stigmatisation was reported by 19.3% of participants, with a higher proportion (p = 0.0001) among nurses (26.3%) and assistant nurses (23.3%) than among physicians (8.5%). From multivariate analysis, higher age, working as a physician and receiving encouragements were independently associated with lower loss of overall quality of life.
The resilience of health care workers was high overall during the first COVID wave although the quality of life decreased more among nursing staff. Social support in the form of encouragements is a key part of management, particularly in times of crisis.
我们旨在评估在法国一家大型大学医院中,不同职业的医护人员在新冠疫情期间个人和职业生活质量的变化。其他已发表的数据来自具有不同医疗体系和疫情动态的国家。
我们邀请本院所有医护人员填写一份包含71个问题的匿名电子问卷,内容涉及在新冠疫情第一波期间之前和期间的个人、职业及总体生活质量感知、总体概况、职业和工作特征、工作安排变化、相关情况下的新冠护理特征、第一波疫情期间的总体感受以及受到鼓励或污名化的个人经历。
共有794名参与者,其中大多数是护理专业人员(n = 416,56%),包括57名护士长、243名护士和116名护士助理。其他参与者为医生(n = 188)和其他医护人员(n = 140)。危机之前,总体职业生活质量较低(10分制下为6.5分)。个人生活质量较高(8.1分),尤其是医生和护士长。新冠危机期间,个人生活质量显著下降(-1.7),在年轻医护人员中更为明显。职业生活质量受影响较小(-0.4),医生的职业生活质量几乎保持不变。新冠病房的工作人员对危机的看法更为积极,但经历了更多疲劳,这导致新冠病房和非新冠病房的生活质量水平相似。鼓励更多来自亲属或同事而非医院管理人员,且非常普遍:所有参与者中有63.4%受到鼓励,其他工作人员为50.5%,医生为71.3%(p = 0.0005)。19.3%的参与者报告受到污名化,护士(26.3%)和助理护士(23.3%)中受污名化的比例高于医生(8.5%)(p = 0.0001)。多因素分析显示,年龄较大、身为医生以及受到鼓励与总体生活质量损失较低独立相关。
在新冠疫情第一波期间,医护人员的总体复原力较高,尽管护理人员的生活质量下降幅度更大。鼓励形式的社会支持是管理的关键部分,尤其是在危机时期。