• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

价值观和偏好对基于循证信息改变红肉和加工肉类消费意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究

Values and preferences influencing willingness to change red and processed meat consumption in response to evidence-based information: a mixed methods study.

作者信息

Prokop-Dorner Anna, Piłat-Kobla Aleksandra, Zając Joanna, Luśtyk Michalina, Valli Claudia, Łapczuk Aneta, Brzyska Monika, Johnston Bradley, Zera Dena, Guyatt Gordon, Alonso-Coello Pablo, Bala Malgorzata M

机构信息

Department of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034Krakow, Poland.

Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2084-2098. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000866. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980022000866
PMID:35392999
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9991620/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is (1) to assess the extent to which omnivores are willing to stop or reduce their consumption of red and processed meat in response to evidence-based information regarding the possible reduction of cancer mortality and incidence achieved by dietary modification; (2) to identify socio-demographic categories associated with higher willingness to change meat consumption and (3) to understand the motives facilitating and hindering such a change.

DESIGN

During an initial computer-assisted web interview, respondents were presented with scenarios containing the estimates of the absolute risk reduction in overall cancer incidence and mortality tailored to their declared level of red and processed meat consumption. Respondents were asked whether they would stop or reduce their average meat consumption based on the information provided. Their dietary choices were assessed at 6-month follow-up. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews to better understand the rationale for dietary practices and the perception of health information.

PARTICIPANTS

The study was conducted among students and staff of three universities in Krakow, Poland.

RESULTS

Most of the 513 respondents were unwilling to change their consumption habits. We found gender to be a significant predictor of the willingness. Finally, we identified four themes reflecting key motives that determined meat consumption preferences: the importance of taste and texture, health consciousness, the habitual nature of cooking and persistence of omnivorous habits.

CONCLUSIONS

When faced with health information about the uncertain reduction in the risk of cancer mortality and incidence, the vast majority of study participants were unwilling to introduce changes in their consumption habits.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)评估杂食者在面对基于证据的信息时,愿意停止或减少红肉和加工肉类消费的程度,这些信息表明通过饮食调整可能降低癌症死亡率和发病率;(2)确定与更高的改变肉类消费意愿相关的社会人口类别;(3)了解促进和阻碍这种改变的动机。

设计

在最初的计算机辅助网络访谈中,向受访者展示了包含根据其宣称的红肉和加工肉类消费水平量身定制的总体癌症发病率和死亡率绝对风险降低估计值的情景。询问受访者是否会根据所提供的信息停止或减少其平均肉类消费。在6个月的随访中评估他们的饮食选择。此外,我们进行了半结构化访谈,以更好地理解饮食习惯的基本原理和对健康信息的认知。

参与者

该研究在波兰克拉科夫的三所大学的学生和教职员工中进行。

结果

513名受访者中的大多数人不愿意改变他们的消费习惯。我们发现性别是意愿的一个重要预测因素。最后,我们确定了反映决定肉类消费偏好的关键动机的四个主题:味道和口感的重要性、健康意识、烹饪的习惯性以及杂食习惯的持续性。

结论

当面对关于癌症死亡率和发病率风险不确定降低的健康信息时,绝大多数研究参与者不愿意改变他们的消费习惯。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/79e1e3dbc409/S1368980022000866_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/b22748ddf74b/S1368980022000866_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/6a400085a66b/S1368980022000866_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/79e1e3dbc409/S1368980022000866_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/b22748ddf74b/S1368980022000866_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/6a400085a66b/S1368980022000866_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292a/9991620/79e1e3dbc409/S1368980022000866_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Values and preferences influencing willingness to change red and processed meat consumption in response to evidence-based information: a mixed methods study.价值观和偏好对基于循证信息改变红肉和加工肉类消费意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2084-2098. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000866. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Values and Preferences Related to Cancer Risk among Red and Processed Meat Eaters: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study with Semi-Structured Interviews.红肉和加工肉类食用者中与癌症风险相关的价值观和偏好:一项采用半结构化访谈的试点横断面研究。
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):2182. doi: 10.3390/foods10092182.
3
Evaluating adults' health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.评估成年人对未加工红肉和加工肉类消费的与健康相关的价值观和偏好:一项横断面混合方法研究的方案。
F1000Res. 2020 May 11;9:346. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23593.2. eCollection 2020.
4
Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.健康相关的肉类摄入价值观和偏好:一项跨部门混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111585.
5
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.健康相关的肉类消费价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):742-755. doi: 10.7326/M19-1326. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
People's Values and Preferences about Meat Consumption in View of the Potential Environmental Impacts of Meat: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review.考虑到肉类潜在的环境影响,人们对肉类消费的价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010286.
7
Rebalancing meat and legume consumption: change-inducing food choice motives and associated individual characteristics in non-vegetarian adults.重新平衡肉类和豆类消费:非素食成年人的诱导性食物选择动机和相关个体特征。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 1;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01317-w.
8
Estimated effects of reductions in processed meat consumption and unprocessed red meat consumption on occurrences of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer, and mortality in the USA: a microsimulation study.美国减少加工肉类和未加工红肉消费对 2 型糖尿病、心血管疾病、结直肠癌和死亡率发生的估计影响:一项微观模拟研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Jul;8(7):e441-e451. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00118-9.
9
Willingness to eat bread with health benefits: habits, taste and health in bread choice.食用有益健康的面包的意愿:习惯、口味和健康在面包选择中的作用。
Public Health. 2019 Feb;167:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.10.018. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
10
Stages of Change toward Meat Reduction: Associations with Motives and Longitudinal Dietary Data on Animal-Based and Plant-Based Food Intakes in French Adults.迈向减少肉类消费的阶段变化:与法国成年人动物源性和植物源性食物摄入的动机和纵向饮食数据的关联。
J Nutr. 2023 Nov;153(11):3295-3307. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.09.017. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Participation and Completion Rates in Questionnaire Surveys of Primary Care Patients: Cluster-Randomized Study.提高基层医疗患者问卷调查的参与率和完成率:整群随机研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Feb 25;14:e67981. doi: 10.2196/67981.
2
Nutrition Users' Guides: RCTs Part 2 - structured guide for interpreting and applying study results from randomised controlled trials on therapy or prevention questions.营养用户指南:随机对照试验第二部分——关于解释和应用治疗或预防问题的随机对照试验研究结果的结构化指南。
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2024 Aug 29;7(2):e000834. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000834. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: Recommendations for a path forward.实施《2020 - 2025年美国人膳食指南》:未来前进道路的建议
J Food Sci. 2021 Dec;86(12):5087-5099. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15969. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
2
Values and Preferences Related to Cancer Risk among Red and Processed Meat Eaters: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study with Semi-Structured Interviews.红肉和加工肉类食用者中与癌症风险相关的价值观和偏好:一项采用半结构化访谈的试点横断面研究。
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):2182. doi: 10.3390/foods10092182.
3
Evaluating adults' health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.
评估成年人对未加工红肉和加工肉类消费的与健康相关的价值观和偏好:一项横断面混合方法研究的方案。
F1000Res. 2020 May 11;9:346. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23593.2. eCollection 2020.
4
What Do Social Media Influencers Say about Health? A Theory-Driven Content Analysis of Top Ten Health Influencers' Posts on Sina Weibo.社交媒体影响者对健康的看法如何?对新浪微博十大健康影响者帖子的理论驱动内容分析。
J Health Commun. 2021 Jan 2;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1865486. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Sorting the Healthy Diet Signal from the Social Media Expert Noise: Preliminary Evidence from the Healthy Diet Discourse on Twitter.从社交媒体专家的噪音中筛选健康饮食信号:来自 Twitter 上健康饮食话语的初步证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228557.
6
Traditional Eastern European diet and mortality: prospective evidence from the HAPIEE study.传统东欧饮食与死亡率:HAPIEE研究的前瞻性证据。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Mar;60(2):1091-1100. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02319-9. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
7
Drivers and barriers toward reducing meat consumption.减少肉类消费的驱动因素和障碍。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104636. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104636. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
8
Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.低量与高量摄入红肉类食物对心血管代谢和癌症结局的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):721-731. doi: 10.7326/M19-0622. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium.未加工的红色肉类和加工肉类的消费:营养建议(NutriRECS)联盟的膳食指南建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):756-764. doi: 10.7326/M19-1621. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
10
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.健康相关的肉类消费价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):742-755. doi: 10.7326/M19-1326. Epub 2019 Oct 1.