• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康相关的肉类摄入价值观和偏好:一项跨部门混合方法研究。

Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111585.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182111585
PMID:34770099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8582724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In addition to social and environmental determinants, people's values and preferences determine daily food choices. This study evaluated adults' values and preferences regarding unprocessed red meat (URM) and processed meat (PM) and their willingness to change their consumption in the face of possible undesirable health consequences.

METHODS

A cross-sectional mixed-methods study including a quantitative assessment through an online survey, a qualitative inquiry through semi-structured interviews, and a follow-up assessment through a telephone survey. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Of 304 participants, over 75% were unwilling to stop their consumption of either URM or PM, and of those unwilling to stop, over 80% were also unwilling to reduce. Men were less likely to stop meat intake than women (odds ratios < 0.4). From the semi-structured interviews, we identified three main themes: the social and/or family context of meat consumption, health- and non-health-related concerns about meat, and uncertainty of the evidence. At three months, 63% of participants reported no changes in meat intake.

CONCLUSIONS

When informed about the cancer incidence and mortality risks of meat consumption, most respondents would not reduce their intake. Public health and clinical nutrition guidelines should ensure that their recommendations are consistent with population values and preferences.

摘要

背景

除了社会和环境决定因素外,人们的价值观和偏好也决定了他们的日常食物选择。本研究评估了成年人对未经加工的红肉(URM)和加工肉类(PM)的价值观和偏好,以及他们在面对可能的不良健康后果时改变消费习惯的意愿。

方法

本研究采用横断面混合方法设计,包括通过在线调查进行定量评估、通过半结构式访谈进行定性研究,以及通过电话调查进行后续评估。我们进行了描述性统计、逻辑回归和主题分析。

结果

在 304 名参与者中,超过 75%的人不愿意停止食用 URM 或 PM,而在那些不愿意停止食用的人中,超过 80%的人也不愿意减少食用量。与女性相比,男性停止肉类摄入的可能性较小(比值比 < 0.4)。通过半结构式访谈,我们确定了三个主要主题:肉类消费的社会和/或家庭背景、与健康和非健康相关的肉类关注问题,以及对证据的不确定性。在三个月时,63%的参与者报告称其肉类摄入量没有变化。

结论

当被告知肉类消费与癌症发病率和死亡率的关系时,大多数受访者不会减少摄入量。公共卫生和临床营养指南应确保其建议与人群的价值观和偏好保持一致。

相似文献

1
Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.健康相关的肉类摄入价值观和偏好:一项跨部门混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111585.
2
Evaluating adults' health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.评估成年人对未加工红肉和加工肉类消费的与健康相关的价值观和偏好:一项横断面混合方法研究的方案。
F1000Res. 2020 May 11;9:346. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23593.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Values and Preferences Related to Cancer Risk among Red and Processed Meat Eaters: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study with Semi-Structured Interviews.红肉和加工肉类食用者中与癌症风险相关的价值观和偏好:一项采用半结构化访谈的试点横断面研究。
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):2182. doi: 10.3390/foods10092182.
4
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.健康相关的肉类消费价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):742-755. doi: 10.7326/M19-1326. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
People's Values and Preferences about Meat Consumption in View of the Potential Environmental Impacts of Meat: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review.考虑到肉类潜在的环境影响,人们对肉类消费的价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010286.
6
Values and preferences influencing willingness to change red and processed meat consumption in response to evidence-based information: a mixed methods study.价值观和偏好对基于循证信息改变红肉和加工肉类消费意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Aug;25(8):2084-2098. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000866. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
Trends in Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, and Fish Consumption in the United States, 1999-2016.美国 1999-2016 年加工肉类、未加工红肉、家禽和鱼类消费趋势。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Jul;119(7):1085-1098.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.004.
8
Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption across North America: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Comparison of Dietary Recalls from Canada, Mexico, and the United States.北美地区的红色肉类和加工肉类消费模式:来自加拿大、墨西哥和美国的全国代表性膳食回顾的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010357.
9
Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.加工肉类、未加工的红肉类、禽类或鱼类摄入量与心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):503-512. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6969.
10
Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium.未加工的红色肉类和加工肉类的消费:营养建议(NutriRECS)联盟的膳食指南建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):756-764. doi: 10.7326/M19-1621. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and functional advantages of cheese containing soy protein and soybean-derived casein.含有大豆蛋白和大豆源酪蛋白的奶酪的健康及功能优势。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jul 23;15:1407506. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1407506. eCollection 2024.
2
Public Awareness of Food Products, Preferences and Practices: Old Challenges and New Insights.公众对食品的认知、偏好和实践:旧挑战与新洞察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 1;20(9):5691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095691.
3
Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland.

本文引用的文献

1
Values and Preferences Related to Cancer Risk among Red and Processed Meat Eaters: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study with Semi-Structured Interviews.红肉和加工肉类食用者中与癌症风险相关的价值观和偏好:一项采用半结构化访谈的试点横断面研究。
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):2182. doi: 10.3390/foods10092182.
2
Evaluating adults' health-related values and preferences about unprocessed red meat and processed meat consumption: protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.评估成年人对未加工红肉和加工肉类消费的与健康相关的价值观和偏好:一项横断面混合方法研究的方案。
F1000Res. 2020 May 11;9:346. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23593.2. eCollection 2020.
3
可持续吗?波兰动物产品消费的洞察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;19(20):13072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013072.
Drivers and barriers toward reducing meat consumption.
减少肉类消费的驱动因素和障碍。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104636. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104636. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Health-Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Consumption: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.健康相关的肉类消费价值观和偏好:一项混合方法系统综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):742-755. doi: 10.7326/M19-1326. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.减少红肉类和加工肉类摄入量与癌症死亡率和发病率:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 19;171(10):711-720. doi: 10.7326/M19-0699. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review.消费者对肉类消费环境问题的态度:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 5;16(7):1220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071220.
7
Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol.方法:可信的营养推荐 NutriRECS(由系统评价组成的营养推荐和可获取的证据摘要):一项方案。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0621-8.
8
Nutrition guidelines vary widely in methodological quality: an overview of reviews.营养指南在方法学质量方面差异很大:综述概述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
An analysis of methods used to synthesize evidence and grade recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines.对食品为基础的膳食指南中综合证据和分级建议的方法进行分析。
Nutr Rev. 2018 Apr 1;76(4):290-300. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux074.
10
The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating.DONE框架:营养与饮食决定因素的跨学科动态框架2.0的创建、评估与更新
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0171077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171077. eCollection 2017.