Antoon James W, Feinstein James A, Grijalva Carlos G, Zhu Yuwei, Dickinson Emily, Stassun Justine C, Johnson Jakobi A, Sekmen Mert, Tanguturi Yasas C, Gay James C, Williams Derek J
aDivision of Hospital Medicine, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee.
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 May 1;12(5):e152-e160. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006329.
The objective of this study was to develop and validate an approach to accurately identify incident pediatric neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) requiring hospitalization by using administrative data.
We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study of children 5 to 18 years of age hospitalized at two US children's hospitals with an NPE. We developed and evaluated 3 NPE identification algorithms: (1) primary or secondary NPE International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis alone, (2) NPE diagnosis, the NPE was present on admission, and the primary diagnosis was not malignancy- or surgery-related, and (3) identical to algorithm 2 but without requiring the NPE be present on admission. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each algorithm was calculated overall and by diagnosis field (primary or secondary), clinical significance, and NPE subtype.
There were 1098 NPE hospitalizations included in the study. A total of 857 confirmed NPEs were identified for algorithm 1, yielding a PPV of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.80). Algorithm 2 (n = 846) had an overall PPV of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.91). For algorithm 3 (n = 938), the overall PPV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.88). PPVs varied by diagnosis order, NPE clinical significance, and subtype. The PPV for critical clinical significance was 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for all 3 algorithms.
We identified a highly accurate method to identify neuropsychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents. The use of these approaches will improve the rigor of future studies of NPE, including the necessary evaluations of medication adverse events, infections, and chronic conditions.
本研究的目的是开发并验证一种利用行政数据准确识别需要住院治疗的小儿神经精神事件(NPEs)的方法。
我们对美国两家儿童医院收治的患有NPE的5至18岁儿童进行了一项横断面多中心研究。我们开发并评估了3种NPE识别算法:(1)仅依据国际疾病分类第10版原发性或继发性NPE诊断;(2)NPE诊断,入院时存在NPE,且原发性诊断与恶性肿瘤或手术无关;(3)与算法2相同,但不要求入院时存在NPE。计算每种算法的总体阳性预测值(PPV),并按诊断领域(原发性或继发性)、临床意义和NPE亚型进行计算。
本研究纳入了1098例NPE住院病例。算法1共识别出857例确诊的NPE,PPV为0.78(95%置信区间[CI]0.76 - 0.80)。算法2(n = 846)的总体PPV为0.89(95%CI 0.87 - 0.91)。算法3(n = 938)的总体PPV为0.86(95%CI 0.83 - 0.88)。PPV因诊断顺序、NPE临床意义和亚型而异。所有3种算法中,具有关键临床意义的PPV为0.99(0.97 - 0.99)。
我们确定了一种高度准确的方法来识别儿童和青少年的神经精神不良事件。这些方法的应用将提高未来NPE研究的严谨性,包括对药物不良事件、感染和慢性病的必要评估。