Department of Clinical Psychology, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
The Family Psychologist, Kidderminster, UK.
Personal Ment Health. 2022 Nov;16(4):300-308. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1541. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis in adolescents is a relatively recent concept and a fast-emerging research area. Regarded by some as controversial, it is important for research to provide greater understanding of differing perspectives and their impact on the use of this diagnosis. Perspectives of 13 clinicians (therapists, psychiatrists and mental health nurses) were explored, to provide a contemporary understanding of perceptions and use of BPD diagnosis within child and adolescent mental health services in England. A particular focus was to explore dilemmas faced by clinicians and how these dilemmas were negotiated. This research took a qualitative, social constructionist approach to explore the in-depth views and experiences of each participant. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, to seek out patterns and commonalities across these clinical perspectives. Three overarching themes were generated: 'Who holds the power?', 'Dilemmas within the multidisciplinary team (MDT)' and 'The weightiness of making this decision'. Professional opinions of an adolescent BPD diagnosis are influenced by dominant and less dominant mental health discourses, including the impact of power, and availability of resources within the service context. The role of meaningful collaboration with young people, clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)在青少年中的诊断是一个相对较新的概念,也是一个快速发展的研究领域。一些人认为这是有争议的,因此研究提供对不同观点及其对该诊断使用的影响的更深入理解非常重要。本研究探讨了 13 名临床医生(治疗师、精神科医生和心理健康护士)的观点,以提供对英格兰儿童和青少年心理健康服务中 BPD 诊断的看法和使用的现代理解。特别关注的是探索临床医生面临的困境以及如何协商这些困境。本研究采用定性、社会建构主义的方法,深入探讨了每位参与者的观点和经验。通过主题分析对访谈进行分析,以寻找这些临床观点之间的模式和共同点。产生了三个总体主题:“谁掌握权力?”、“多学科团队(MDT)中的困境”和“做出这一决定的重要性”。对青少年 BPD 诊断的专业意见受到主导和非主导心理健康话语的影响,包括权力的影响以及服务环境中资源的可用性。讨论了与年轻人进行有意义合作的作用、临床意义和未来研究方向。