• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国新型药品的增量效益:2010 年至 2020 年 NICE 技术评估的横断面分析。

Incremental benefits of novel pharmaceuticals in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of NICE technology appraisals from 2010 to 2020.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, , Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e058279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058279.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058279
PMID:35396306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8996039/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incremental value of new drugs across disease areas receiving favourable coverage decisions by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over the past decade.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study assessed favourable appraisal decisions of drugs between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020. Estimates of incremental benefit were extracted from NICE's evidence review groups reports.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Incremental benefit of novel drugs relative to the best alternative therapeutic option, expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).

RESULTS

184 appraisals of 129 drugs provided QALYs. The median incremental value was 0.27 QALY (IQR: 0.07-0.73). Benefits varied across drug-indication pairs (range: -0.49 to 5.22 QALY). The highest median benefits were found in haematology (0.70, IQR: 0.55-1.22) and oncology (0.46, IQR: 0.20-0.88), the lowest in ophthalmology (0.09, IQR: 0.04-0.22) and endocrinology (0.02, IQR: 0.01-0.06). Eight appraisals (4.3%) found contributions of more than two QALYs, but one in four (50/184) drug-indication pairs provided less than the equivalent of 1 month in perfect health compared to existing treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In our review period, the median incremental value of novel drugs approved for use within the English National Health System, relative to the best alternative therapeutic option, was equivalent to 3-4 months of life in perfect health, but data were heterogeneous. Objective evaluations of therapeutic value helps patients and physicians to develop reasonable expectations of drugs and delivers insights into disease areas where medicinal therapeutic progress has had the most and least impact.

摘要

目的

评估过去十年英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)对各疾病领域内获得有利覆盖决策的新药的增量价值。

设计、设置和参与者:本横断面研究评估了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间药物的有利评估决策。从 NICE 的证据审查小组报告中提取增量获益估计值。

主要结局测量指标

新型药物相对于最佳替代治疗选择的增量获益,用质量调整生命年(QALY)表示。

结果

184 项药物评估涉及 129 种药物,提供了 QALY 数据。中位增量值为 0.27 QALY(IQR:0.07-0.73)。药物-适应证对之间的获益存在差异(范围:-0.49 至 5.22 QALY)。最高的中位获益见于血液学(0.70,IQR:0.55-1.22)和肿瘤学(0.46,IQR:0.20-0.88),最低的见于眼科(0.09,IQR:0.04-0.22)和内分泌学(0.02,IQR:0.01-0.06)。8 项评估(4.3%)发现增量贡献超过 2 QALY,但四分之一(50/184)的药物-适应证对提供的获益相对于现有治疗方法,与完全健康状态下的 1 个月相当。

结论

在我们的审查期间,相对于最佳替代治疗选择,在英国国家卫生系统内批准使用的新型药物的中位增量价值,相当于完全健康状态下 3-4 个月的生命,但数据存在异质性。对治疗价值的客观评估有助于患者和医生对药物产生合理的期望,并深入了解药物治疗最有成效和最无成效的疾病领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba8/8996039/611669c7caa7/bmjopen-2021-058279f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba8/8996039/76876edb94e0/bmjopen-2021-058279f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba8/8996039/611669c7caa7/bmjopen-2021-058279f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba8/8996039/76876edb94e0/bmjopen-2021-058279f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba8/8996039/611669c7caa7/bmjopen-2021-058279f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Incremental benefits of novel pharmaceuticals in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of NICE technology appraisals from 2010 to 2020.英国新型药品的增量效益:2010 年至 2020 年 NICE 技术评估的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e058279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058279.
2
Audit of data redaction practices in NICE technology appraisals from 1999 to 2019.1999 年至 2019 年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所技术评估中数据编辑实践的审核。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 6;11(10):e051812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051812.
3
A Decade of Health Innovation: The Impact of New Medicines on Patient Health and the Implications for NICE's Size of Benefit Multiplier.健康创新的十年:新药对患者健康的影响及对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所效益乘数规模的启示
Value Health. 2023 Oct;26(10):1435-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Some inconsistencies in NICE's consideration of social values.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)在社会价值观考量方面存在一些不一致之处。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Nov;32(11):1043-53. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0204-4.
5
A comparative analysis of two contrasting European approaches for rewarding the value added by drugs for cancer: England versus France.对欧洲两种截然不同的癌症药物增值奖励方法的比较分析:英国与法国。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 May;32(5):509-20. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0144-z.
6
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
7
What Is the Evidence from Past National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Single-Technology Appraisals Regarding Company Submissions with Base-Case Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios of Less Than £10,000/QALY?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(National Institute of Health and Care Excellence)过去的单一技术评估中,关于公司提交的基础案例增量成本效益比低于10,000英镑/质量调整生命年(QALY)的证据有哪些?
Value Health. 2018 Mar;21(3):341-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
Systematic reviews and economic evaluations conducted for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom: a game of two halves?为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所开展的系统评价与经济评估:一场分上下半场的比赛?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Spring;24(2):146-50. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080203.
9
Azacitidine for Treating Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with More Than 30 % Bone Marrow Blasts: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Single Technology Appraisal.阿扎胞苷治疗骨髓母细胞超过30%的急性髓系白血病:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估的证据审查小组观点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):363-373. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0453-5.
10
The Impact of Moving from EQ-5D-3L to -5L in NICE Technology Appraisals.从 EQ-5D-3L 到 -5L 在 NICE 技术评估中的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):75-84. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0701-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality in Sweden.瑞典低手术死亡风险的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益分析
Ups J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 4;130. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v130.10741. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low risk of surgical mortality in Sweden.瑞典低手术死亡风险的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的成本效益分析
Ups J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 7;129. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10741. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The predictive value of a positive phase 2 ASH abstract for peer-reviewed publication and progression to phase 3.二期美国血液学会(ASH)摘要呈阳性对于同行评审发表及进入三期研究的预测价值。
Blood. 2022 Mar 24;139(12):1920-1923. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021013988.
2
Real-world data from expanded access programmes in health technology assessments: a review of NICE technology appraisals.卫生技术评估扩展准入计划中的真实世界数据:对 NICE 技术评估的回顾。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e052186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052186.
3
The wider perspective: twenty years of clinical trials in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Benefits of early highly effective versus escalation treatment strategies in relapsing multiple sclerosis estimated using a treatment-sequence model.使用治疗顺序模型估计复发型多发性硬化症中早期高效与升级治疗策略的获益。
Mult Scler. 2024 Jul;30(8):1016-1025. doi: 10.1177/13524585241258692. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
更广阔的视角:骨髓增生异常综合征 20 年临床试验。
Br J Haematol. 2022 Jan;196(2):329-335. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17892. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
4
Intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in localised prostate cancer: an aggregate meta-analysis.局部前列腺癌中替代终点的临床中期结果:汇总荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):402-410. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30730-0.
5
Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.英格兰对有资格获得美国食品和药物管理局加速批准的癌症药物的覆盖范围评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):490-498. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8441.
6
Two decades of targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia.急性髓细胞白血病的靶向治疗二十年。
Leukemia. 2021 Mar;35(3):651-660. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01164-x. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
8
Update on Eluxadoline for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea: Patient Selection and Perspectives.关于 Eluxadoline 治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的最新进展:患者选择和观点。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Apr 9;14:1391-1400. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S216056. eCollection 2020.
9
FDA Approval and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals, 1983-2018.FDA 对药品的批准与监管,1983-2018 年。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):164-176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20288.
10
Venetoclax for Treating Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.维奈托克治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病:NICE 单技术评估的循证评估组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0599-9.