• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对激光辅助眼睑成形术与刀片辅助眼睑成形术的看法。

Public perception of laser-assisted blepharoplasty versus blade-assisted blepharoplasty.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; University Centre of Ophthalmology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;58(4):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.03.006
PMID:35397233
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perceptions of blade- versus laser-based blepharoplasty before and after being provided educational information.

METHODS

This interventional pre-post study included 145 randomly selected participants (Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Canada, August 2020) who were asked about their perceptions surrounding blepharoplasty. Participants then received information about the techniques before answering final questions.

RESULTS

Participants perceived no difference in outcomes for blade (37%) versus laser (40%) blepharoplasty precounselling. This increased to laser blepharoplasty postintervention (56%, p < 0.001) despite being told that there was no difference in outcomes. The higher the level of education among participants, the more likely they were to correctly believe that both techniques had similar outcomes (p = 0.049). Most participants would choose laser blepharoplasty initially (64%), and this percentage increased postintervention (81%, p < 0.001). The preintervention perception of blade blepharoplasty recovery time (20.1 ± 32.6 days) was longer than that for laser blepharoplasty (13.5 ± 32.0 days, p = 0.01) and increased for both techniques postintervention (p < 0.001). Perceived pain was lower for laser blepharoplasty. Postintervention, participants responded that additional costs of ($975 ± $1,091) would justify laser over blade blepharoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Elucidating patient perceptions and preferences for blade- versus laser-based blepharoplasty provides surgeons with perspective on how to tailor preoperative counselling. Before and after the intervention, participants had a bias toward choosing laser blepharoplasty. The intervention seems to falsely convince people that laser blepharoplasty leads to better outcomes. Because the doctor's advice can greatly impact patients' decisions, physicians have to be careful not to give false expectations when counselling patients. Inaccurate recall of key educational takeaways suggests that information should be vulgarized and delivered actively to patients.

摘要

目的

评估在提供教育信息前后,对基于刀片和激光的眼睑成形术的看法。

方法

本项干预性前后研究纳入了 145 名随机选择的参与者(加拿大蒙特利尔 Maisonneuve-Rosemont 医院,2020 年 8 月),他们被问到与眼睑成形术相关的看法。参与者在回答最终问题之前,先获得关于这些技术的信息。

结果

在术前咨询时,参与者认为刀片(37%)和激光(40%)眼睑成形术的结果没有差异。干预后,这种看法增加到激光眼睑成形术(56%,p<0.001),尽管被告知结果没有差异。参与者的受教育程度越高,他们就越有可能正确地认为这两种技术的结果相似(p=0.049)。大多数参与者最初会选择激光眼睑成形术(64%),干预后这一比例增加到(81%,p<0.001)。术前对刀片眼睑成形术恢复期的看法(20.1±32.6 天)长于激光眼睑成形术(13.5±32.0 天,p=0.01),干预后两种技术的恢复期都延长(p<0.001)。激光眼睑成形术的疼痛感知较低。术后,参与者表示,激光比刀片眼睑成形术高出(975±1091)美元的额外费用是合理的。

结论

阐明患者对基于刀片和激光的眼睑成形术的看法和偏好,为外科医生提供了如何调整术前咨询的视角。在干预前后,参与者更倾向于选择激光眼睑成形术。干预似乎错误地使人们相信激光眼睑成形术会带来更好的结果。由于医生的建议可以极大地影响患者的决策,医生在为患者提供咨询时必须小心,不要给予错误的期望。对关键教育要点的记忆不准确表明,应该将信息通俗化并主动传递给患者。

相似文献

1
Public perception of laser-assisted blepharoplasty versus blade-assisted blepharoplasty.公众对激光辅助眼睑成形术与刀片辅助眼睑成形术的看法。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;58(4):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Current trends in laser blepharoplasty. Results of a survey.激光眼睑成形术的当前趋势。一项调查结果。
Dermatol Surg. 1995 Dec;21(12):1060-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1995.tb00559.x.
3
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of CO Laser-Assisted Blepharoplasty Using Two Different Methods.两种不同方法的CO2激光辅助睑成形术临床结果比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;78(6):1006-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
4
Laser-assisted blepharoplasty and inferior lateral retinaculum plication: skin contraction versus skin traction.激光辅助睑成形术与下外侧支持韧带折叠术:皮肤收缩与皮肤牵引
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):579-85. doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-0036-0.
5
CO2 Laser Lash Tilt Technique for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Lash Ptosis and Augmentation of Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Results.二氧化碳激光睫毛倾斜技术治疗轻度至中度睫毛下垂和增强上睑成形术效果。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul/Aug;35(4):399-402. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001362.
6
Radiowave surgery versus CO laser for upper blepharoplasty incision: which modality produces the most aesthetic incision?用于上睑成形术切口的射频手术与二氧化碳激光:哪种方式能产生最美观的切口?
Dermatol Surg. 2008 Jul;34(7):912-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34177.x.
7
[Upper eyelid blepharoplasty with the CO2 laser].[二氧化碳激光上睑成形术]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2014 Jan;231(1):28-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351068. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
8
Upper Eyelid Fractional CO2 Laser Resurfacing With Incisional Blepharoplasty.上睑二氧化碳分次激光表面重塑联合切开式眼睑成形术
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul-Aug;32(4):267-9. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000495.
9
Blepharoplasty: laser or cold steel?眼睑成形术:激光还是冷钢?
Skin Therapy Lett. 2003 Nov-Dec;8(7):5-7.
10
Patient experience with blepharoplasty.患者对眼睑成形术的体验。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):152-4. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181eea7d7.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern blepharoplasty: From bench to bedside.现代眼睑成形术:从实验台到临床应用。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Mar 16;11(8):1719-1729. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i8.1719.