Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 7, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02148-8.
The main goal of an endodontic treatment is a complete debridement of the root canal system; however, currently mechanical shaping and chemical cleaning procedures for this purpose have deemed non-satisfactory.
The efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA; 0.5, 1.0, 2.0%), as a root canal irrigation solution, against Enterococcus faecalis (DSM 20478) and Parvimonas micra (DSM 20468) when compared with the one of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCI; 1.0, 3.0, 5.0%), chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX; 0.12, 0.2, 2.0%) and 0.9% NaCI (as a control solution) was in vitro investigated with the agar diffusion and direct contact methods. The inhibition zone diameters observed with the agar diffusion test were determined. The viable bacterial counts (CFU/ml) were calculated with the direct method.
The agar diffusion test showed that all three root canal irrigation solutions had an efficacy against E. faecalis at all concentrations. The largest inhibition zone diameters against E. faecalis were observed with 5.0% NaOCI. At all three concentrations of PAA, NaOCI, and CHX, the inhibition zone diameter increased with increase in concentration. For P. micra, PAA had a similar inhibition zone diameter despite a concentration increase. In contrast, for NaOCI and CHX, the inhibition zone diameter increased with increasing concentration. 2.0% CHX produced the largest inhibition zone diameter against P. micra. For E. faecalis, only the comparison between 2.0% PAA and 5.0% NaOCI showed statistical significance (p = 0.004). For P. micra the efficacy comparison between the lowest, middle, and highest concentrations of each solution, a statistical significance (p < 0.05) was found for all three solutions. After direct contact with PAA, NaOCI and CHX, no viable bacteria could be determined for either P. micra or E. faecalis.
PAA had a similar antibacterial efficacy as the one of NaOCl and CHX when in direct contact with E. faecalis and P. micra. In the agar diffusion test, PAA showed a similar antibacterial efficacy as the one of CHX and a lower one as the one of NaOCl for E. faecalis.
牙髓治疗的主要目标是彻底清除根管系统;然而,目前用于此目的的机械成型和化学清洁程序被认为是不理想的。
过氧乙酸(PAA;0.5、1.0、2.0%)作为根管冲洗液,与次氯酸钠(NaOCI;1.0、3.0、5.0%)、洗必泰葡萄糖酸盐(CHX;0.12、0.2、2.0%)和 0.9%NaCl(作为对照溶液)相比,对粪肠球菌(DSM 20478)和小韦荣球菌(DSM 20468)的疗效,通过琼脂扩散和直接接触法进行了体外研究。用琼脂扩散试验测定观察到的抑菌圈直径。用直接法计算活菌数(CFU/ml)。
琼脂扩散试验表明,所有三种根管冲洗液在所有浓度下均对粪肠球菌有效。观察到的对粪肠球菌最大抑菌圈直径为 5.0%NaOCI。在 PAA、NaOCI 和 CHX 的所有三种浓度下,抑菌圈直径随浓度增加而增加。对于小韦荣球菌,尽管浓度增加,但 PAA 的抑菌圈直径相似。相比之下,对于 NaOCI 和 CHX,抑菌圈直径随浓度增加而增加。2.0%CHX 对小韦荣球菌产生的抑菌圈直径最大。对于粪肠球菌,只有 2.0%PAA 与 5.0%NaOCI 之间的比较显示出统计学意义(p=0.004)。对于小韦荣球菌,对于每种溶液的最低、中间和最高浓度之间的功效比较,所有三种溶液均发现具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。直接接触 PAA、NaOCI 和 CHX 后,无法确定小韦荣球菌或粪肠球菌是否有存活细菌。
PAA 与 NaOCl 和 CHX 直接接触时,对粪肠球菌和小韦荣球菌具有相似的抗菌功效。在琼脂扩散试验中,PAA 对粪肠球菌的抗菌功效与 CHX 相似,而低于 NaOCl。