Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J Ultrasound. 2023 Mar;26(1):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00678-z. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
The corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) is derived from a pulsed-wave Doppler signal at the common carotid artery. Several equations are currently used to calculate ccFT. Its ability to assess the intravascular volume status non-invasively has recently been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation and trending ability of ccFT with invasive cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) measurements.
Eighteen cardiac surgery patients were included in this prospective observational study. ccFT measurements were obtained at three time points: after induction of anesthesia (T1), after a passive leg raise (T2), and post-bypass (T3). Simultaneously, CO and SV were measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis. Three different equations (Bazett, Chambers, and Wodey) were used to calculate ccFT. The correlation and percentage change in time (concordance) between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV were evaluated.
Mean ccFT values differed significantly for the three equations (p < 0.001). The correlation between ccFT and CO and between ccFT and SV was highest for Bazett's (ρ = 0.43, p < 0.0001) and Wodey's (ρ = 0.33, p < 0.0001) equations, respectively. Concordance between ΔccFT and ΔCO and between ΔccFT and ΔSV was highest for Bazett's (100%) and Wodey's (82%) equations, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that correlation and concordance between SV and ccFT improved when assessed within limited heart rate (HR) ranges.
The use of different ccFT equations leads to variable correlation and concordance rates between ccFT and CO/SV measurements. Bazett's equation acceptably tracked CO changes in time, while the trending capability of SV was poor.
校正颈动脉血流时间(ccFT)是从颈总动脉的脉冲波多普勒信号中得出的。目前有几种方程用于计算 ccFT。最近研究了它无创评估血管内容量状态的能力。本研究的目的是评估 ccFT 与有创心输出量(CO)和每搏量(SV)测量值的相关性和趋势能力。
本前瞻性观察研究纳入了 18 名心脏手术患者。在三个时间点(麻醉诱导后(T1)、被动抬腿后(T2)和旁路后(T3))进行 ccFT 测量。同时,通过校准脉搏轮廓分析测量 CO 和 SV。使用三种不同的方程(Bazett、Chambers 和 Wodey)计算 ccFT。评估 ccFT 与 CO 和 ccFT 与 SV 之间的相关性和时间百分比变化(一致性)。
三种方程的平均 ccFT 值差异显著(p < 0.001)。Bazett's 方程(ρ = 0.43,p < 0.0001)和 Wodey's 方程(ρ = 0.33,p < 0.0001)分别与 ccFT 和 CO 以及 ccFT 和 SV 的相关性最高。Bazett's 方程(一致性为 100%)和 Wodey's 方程(一致性为 82%)之间的 ΔccFT 和 ΔCO 以及 ΔccFT 和 ΔSV 的一致性最高。亚组分析表明,当在有限的心率(HR)范围内评估时,SV 与 ccFT 之间的相关性和一致性得到改善。
不同的 ccFT 方程的使用导致 ccFT 与 CO/SV 测量值之间的相关性和一致性存在差异。Bazett's 方程能够随时间接受 CO 的变化,而 SV 的趋势能力较差。