Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1513-1520. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02481-3. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
This study aimed to utilize a hemorrhagic shock pig model to compare two hemodynamic monitoring methods, pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) and spectral carotid artery Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Additionally, we sought to explore the feasibility of employing CDU as a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring tool in the context of hemorrhagic shock and fluid resuscitation.
Animal experiments.
Female pigs were selected, and hemorrhagic shock was induced by rapid bleeding through an arterial sheath.
Hemodynamic monitoring was conducted using both PiCCO and CDU during episodes of hemorrhagic shock and fluid resuscitation.
Among the 10 female pigs studied, CDU measurements revealed a significant decrease in carotid velocity time integral (cVTI) compared to baseline values under shock conditions. During the resuscitation phase, after the mean arterial pressure (MAP) returned to its baseline level, there was no significant difference between cVTI and baseline values. A similar trend was observed for carotid peak velocity (cPV). The corrected flow time (FTc) exhibited a significant difference only at the time of shock compared to baseline values. In comparison to PiCCO, there was a significant correlation between cVTI and MAP (r = 0.616, P < 0.001), stroke volume (SV) (r = 0.821, P < 0.001), and cardiac index (CI) (r = 0.698, P < 0.001). The carotid Doppler shock index (cDSI) displayed negative correlations with MAP (r = - 0.593, P < 0.001), SV (r = - 0.761, P < 0.001), and CI (r = - 0.548, P < 0.001), while showing a positive correlation with the shock index (SI) (r = 0.647, P < 0.001).
Compared to PiCCO, CDU monitoring can reliably reflect the volume status of hemorrhagic shock and fluid resuscitation. CDU offers the advantages of being non-invasive, providing real-time data, and being operationally straightforward. These characteristics make it a valuable tool for assessing and managing hemorrhagic shock, especially in resource-limited settings.
本研究旨在利用失血性休克猪模型比较两种血流动力学监测方法,即脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)和频谱颈动脉多普勒超声(CDU)。此外,我们还探索了 CDU 在失血性休克和液体复苏情况下作为非侵入性血流动力学监测工具的可行性。
动物实验。
选择雌性猪,通过动脉鞘快速出血诱导失血性休克。
在失血性休克和液体复苏期间,同时使用 PiCCO 和 CDU 进行血流动力学监测。
在研究的 10 头雌性猪中,CDU 测量显示在休克状态下,颈动脉速度时间积分(cVTI)与基础值相比显著降低。在复苏阶段,平均动脉压(MAP)恢复到基础水平后,cVTI 与基础值之间没有显著差异。颈动脉峰值速度(cPV)也呈现出类似的趋势。校正流量时间(FTc)仅在休克时与基础值相比存在显著差异。与 PiCCO 相比,cVTI 与 MAP(r=0.616,P<0.001)、每搏量(SV)(r=0.821,P<0.001)和心指数(CI)(r=0.698,P<0.001)之间存在显著相关性。颈动脉多普勒休克指数(cDSI)与 MAP(r=-0.593,P<0.001)、SV(r=-0.761,P<0.001)和 CI(r=-0.548,P<0.001)呈负相关,与休克指数(SI)(r=0.647,P<0.001)呈正相关。
与 PiCCO 相比,CDU 监测可以可靠地反映失血性休克和液体复苏的容量状态。CDU 具有非侵入性、提供实时数据和操作简单的优点。这些特点使其成为评估和管理失血性休克的有价值工具,特别是在资源有限的情况下。