• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢截肢患者使用标准化结局测量工具的情况:美国假肢从业者的调查。

Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for People With Lower Limb Amputation: A Survey of Prosthetic Practitioners in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Research Department, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St Paul, Minnesota; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1786-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.009
PMID:35398048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9452451/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical resources available for the assessment of health outcomes in people with lower limb amputation and to understand barriers and facilitators associated with use of standardized outcome measures in clinical practice.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

General community (online).

PARTICIPANTS

A volunteer sample of prosthetic practitioners was recruited through national professional organizations. Eligible participants were practitioners certified by a professional prosthetics organization and currently practicing as a prosthetist, prosthetist-orthotist, or prosthetic assistant.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A custom-designed online survey on clinical use of patient-reported and performance-based standardized outcome measures to assess patients with lower limb amputation.

RESULTS

A total of 375 participants completed the survey. Most participants (79%) reported that they are encouraged or required to administer standardized outcome measures in their clinic or facility. Most participants reported that use of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures are within their scope of practice (88%) and that they have the knowledge required for outcomes measurement (84%). Few participants agreed that outcomes measurement is standardized across the profession (30%). Most participants had access to small spaces and equipment for outcomes measurement, such as short hallways (65%-94%), stairs (69%), and tablets with wireless internet connection (83%). Most participants reported that they would be willing to spend between 5 (36% of participants) and 10 (43% of participants) minutes on self-reported surveys, and between 10 (41% of participants) and 20 (28% of participants) minutes on performance-based tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes measurement is encouraged or expected in contemporary prosthetic practice. Strategies to improve standardization and efficiency of administration are needed to facilitate routine use of outcome measures in clinical care.

摘要

目的

评估下肢截肢患者健康结局评估的可用临床资源,并了解临床实践中使用标准化结局测量工具的障碍和促进因素。

设计

横断面调查。

设置

一般社区(在线)。

参与者

通过国家专业组织招募了志愿样本的假肢从业者。合格的参与者是由专业假肢组织认证且目前作为假肢技师、假肢矫形技师或假肢助理执业的从业者。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

一项关于患者报告和基于表现的标准化结局测量工具在评估下肢截肢患者中的临床使用的定制在线调查。

结果

共有 375 名参与者完成了调查。大多数参与者(79%)报告他们在诊所或机构中被鼓励或要求使用标准化结局测量工具。大多数参与者报告患者报告和基于表现的结局测量工具在其实践范围内(88%),并且他们具备所需的结局测量知识(84%)。少数参与者同意该专业内的结局测量是标准化的(30%)。大多数参与者可以获得用于结局测量的小空间和设备,例如短走廊(65%-94%)、楼梯(69%)和带无线互联网连接的平板电脑(83%)。大多数参与者报告说,他们愿意花 5 分钟(36%的参与者)到 10 分钟(43%的参与者)填写自我报告的调查问卷,以及 10 分钟(41%的参与者)到 20 分钟(28%的参与者)完成基于表现的测试。

结论

在当代假肢实践中鼓励或期望进行结局测量。需要制定策略来提高管理的标准化和效率,以促进结局测量在临床护理中的常规使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/0cd7e5133cb5/nihms-1795973-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/93b4771943fb/nihms-1795973-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/7427393a9ece/nihms-1795973-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/fa9afd27471e/nihms-1795973-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/90cb7ca1262a/nihms-1795973-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/3148d2e3690a/nihms-1795973-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/f5710a7f7a80/nihms-1795973-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/0cd7e5133cb5/nihms-1795973-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/93b4771943fb/nihms-1795973-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/7427393a9ece/nihms-1795973-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/fa9afd27471e/nihms-1795973-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/90cb7ca1262a/nihms-1795973-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/3148d2e3690a/nihms-1795973-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/f5710a7f7a80/nihms-1795973-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2d8/9452451/0cd7e5133cb5/nihms-1795973-f0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for People With Lower Limb Amputation: A Survey of Prosthetic Practitioners in the United States.下肢截肢患者使用标准化结局测量工具的情况:美国假肢从业者的调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1786-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).开发用于测量下肢截肢者假肢移动能力的项目库:假肢使用者移动性调查(PLUS-M)。
PM R. 2023 Apr;15(4):456-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Association of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender to Disparities in Functional Recovery and Social Health After Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.种族、民族和性别与主要下肢截肢后功能恢复和社会健康差异的关联:一项横断面试点研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
4
Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.下肢截肢成人假肢使用者运动能力调查(PLUS-M)的结构效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
5
Survey of U.S. Practitioners on the Validity of the Medicare Functional Classification Level System and Utility of Clinical Outcome Measures for Aiding K-Level Assignment.美国从业者对医疗保险功能分级水平系统的有效性及辅助K级分配的临床结局指标效用的调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1053-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Use of standardized outcome measures for people with lower-limb amputation: A survey of prosthetic practitioners in Canada.下肢截肢患者标准化结局测量指标的应用:加拿大假肢从业者调查
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Dec 1;48(6):684-693. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000339. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
The Utility of the 2-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Mobility in People With Lower Limb Amputation.两分钟步行试验在下肢截肢患者移动能力测量中的效用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1183-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.ISPO 下肢 COMPASS 推荐:患者报告和基于表现的结局测量指标。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
Disparities in functional recovery after dysvascular lower limb amputation are associated with employment status and self-efficacy.血管性下肢截肢后功能恢复的差异与就业状况和自我效能感有关。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jul;45(14):2280-2287. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2087762. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.全国上肢截肢退伍军人样本中的假肢满意度
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Apr;44(2):81-91. doi: 10.1177/0309364619895201. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of standardized outcome measures among physical therapists in the United States: A cross-sectional survey study.美国物理治疗师对标准化结局指标的使用:一项横断面调查研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330528. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and pilot administration of the amputation-related pain and sensation assessment tool.截肢相关疼痛和感觉评估工具的开发与初步应用
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Mar;47(6):1567-1576. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2374489. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
3
Development and initial validation of the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M): An item bank for evaluating mobility of people who use lower-limb orthoses.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Resources for Assessing Mobility of People with Lower-Limb Amputation: Interviews with Rehabilitation Clinicians.评估下肢截肢者活动能力的临床资源:对康复临床医生的访谈
J Prosthet Orthot. 2022 Apr;34(2):69-78. doi: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000345.
2
Variations in 2-Minute Walk Test outcomes for people with lower limb amputation in the outpatient clinic and research settings.门诊和研究环境中下肢截肢患者2分钟步行测试结果的差异。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Apr 1;46(2):140-147. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000090.
3
Selecting, Administering, and Interpreting Outcome Measures among Adults with Lower-Limb Loss: An Update for Clinicians.
下肢矫形器使用者移动能力的矫形器患者报告结局-移动性(OPRO-M)的制定和初步验证:用于评估使用下肢矫形器的人的移动能力的项目库。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293848. eCollection 2023.
4
Validating a fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scale in lower limb prosthesis users.验证与害怕跌倒相关的活动回避量表在下肢假体使用者中的有效性。
PM R. 2024 May;16(5):462-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13063. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Development of an item bank for measuring prosthetic mobility in people with lower limb amputation: The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).开发用于测量下肢截肢者假肢移动能力的项目库:假肢使用者移动性调查(PLUS-M)。
PM R. 2023 Apr;15(4):456-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12962. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
Modifying the five-time sit-to-stand test to allow use of the upper limbs: Assessing initial evidence of construct validity among lower limb prosthesis users.修改五次坐站测试以允许使用上肢:评估下肢假体使用者中结构有效性的初步证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0279543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279543. eCollection 2023.
下肢缺失成人结局指标的选择、应用及解读:临床医生最新指南
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Sep;8(3):92-109. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00274-4. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
4
Interrater and Test-Retest Reliability of Performance-Based Clinical Tests Administered to Established Users of Lower Limb Prostheses.下肢假肢已使用者进行基于表现的临床测试的测评者间信度和重测信度。
Phys Ther. 2020 Jul 19;100(7):1206-1216. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa063.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Impact of Course Configuration on 6-Minute Walk Test Performance of People with Lower Extremity Amputations.课程设置对下肢截肢者6分钟步行测试表现的影响。
Physiother Can. 2017;69(3):197-203. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-24.
7
Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications.用于假肢应用的自我报告结果测量的心理测量评估。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):797-812. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.12.0228.
8
Prosthetists' perceptions and use of outcome measures in clinical practice: Long-term effects of focused continuing education.假肢师在临床实践中对结局指标的认知与应用:聚焦式继续教育的长期影响
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Jun;41(3):266-273. doi: 10.1177/0309364616664152. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
Construct Validity of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) in Adults With Lower Limb Amputation.下肢截肢成人假肢使用者运动能力调查(PLUS-M)的结构效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Survey of U.S. Practitioners on the Validity of the Medicare Functional Classification Level System and Utility of Clinical Outcome Measures for Aiding K-Level Assignment.美国从业者对医疗保险功能分级水平系统的有效性及辅助K级分配的临床结局指标效用的调查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;97(7):1053-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Mar 22.