Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR) at the Dr. William M. Scholl College of Podiatric Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
PM R. 2024 May;16(5):462-473. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13063. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
Limited available data suggest that fear of falling (FoF) may be common among lower limb prosthesis users (LLPUs) and associated with negative rehabilitation outcomes. The impact of FoF on outcomes may be exacerbated when fear leads to self-imposed declines in activity. There is a need to identify the validity of fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance scales in LLPUs.
To evaluate the convergent, discriminant, and known-group construct validity of the modified Survey of Activities and FoF in the Elderly (mSAFE) for LLPUs. Secondarily, we sought to determine if the mSAFE scale could be reduced without losing information regarding construct validity.
Online survey.
Not applicable.
Fifty-nine persons with unilateral or bilateral amputation at the transtibial or transfemoral level, with ≥6 months experience using a definitive prosthesis for activities other than transfers.
Participants completed an online survey that consisted of the mSAFE and questions to assess FoF (yes/no), fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance (yes/no), as well as previously validated scales capturing related and unrelated constructs. T-tests were used to compare mSAFE score between yes/no respondents for known-group construct validity. Correlations between mSAFE and previously validated surveys assessed convergent and discriminant validity. Analyses were repeated on a reduced number of mSAFE items following a redundancy analysis.
Not applicable.
Significant correlation coefficients of |0.440-0.825| were found for convergent validity with evidence of known-group construct validity (p < .021 for all comparisons). There was evidence for discriminant validity, with non-significant associations for two-of-three correlations. Results from validity analyses for a shortened 6-item mSAFE were similar to that for the full scale.
This study provided initial evidence regarding validity of the mSAFE as a measure to assess fear-of-falling-related activity avoidance in LLPUs. A 6-item scale may be appropriate if the full scale would be taxing or time-consuming.
有限的可用数据表明,下肢假体使用者(LLPU)可能普遍存在跌倒恐惧(FoF),并与负面康复结果相关。当恐惧导致自我活动减少时,FoF 对结果的影响可能会加剧。因此,有必要确定与跌倒恐惧相关的活动回避量表在 LLPU 中的有效性。
评估改良老年人跌倒恐惧和活动调查(mSAFE)在 LLPU 中的收敛、区分和已知组构效性。其次,我们试图确定如果不丢失与构效性相关的信息,mSAFE 量表是否可以简化。
在线调查。
不适用。
59 名单侧或双侧截肢(胫骨或股骨),使用永久性假肢进行非转移活动的经验≥6 个月。
参与者完成了一项在线调查,该调查由 mSAFE 和问题组成,以评估 FoF(是/否)、与跌倒恐惧相关的活动回避(是/否),以及先前验证的捕捉相关和不相关结构的量表。对于已知组构效性,使用 t 检验比较 mSAFE 得分在是/否回答者之间的差异。mSAFE 与先前验证的调查之间的相关性评估收敛和区分效度。冗余分析后,对 mSAFE 的较少项目进行了重复分析。
不适用。
收敛效度的相关系数为|0.440-0.825|,具有已知组构效性的证据(所有比较的 p 值均<.021)。存在区分效度的证据,三个相关性中的两个具有非显著关联。缩短为 6 项的 mSAFE 的有效性分析结果与完整量表相似。
这项研究为 mSAFE 作为评估 LLPU 与跌倒恐惧相关的活动回避的测量工具的有效性提供了初步证据。如果完整量表过于繁琐或耗时,6 项量表可能更为合适。