Department of Education, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Med. 2022 Apr 11;20(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02314-3.
Previous studies have reported associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and lower socioeconomic status and intelligence. We aimed to evaluate the causal directions and strengths for these associations by use of a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design.
We used summary-level data from the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify genetic instruments for ADHD, intelligence, and markers of socioeconomic status including the Townsend deprivation index, household income, and educational attainment. Effect estimates from individual genetic variants were combined using inverse-variance weighted regression.
A genetically predicted one standard deviation (SD) increment in the Townsend deprivation index conferred an odds ratio (OR) of 5.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-14.76) for an ADHD diagnosis (p<0.001). A genetically predicted one SD higher education level conferred an OR of 0.30 (95% CI 0.25-0.37) (p<0.001), and a genetically predicted one SD higher family income provided an OR of 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49; p<0.001). The associations remained after adjustment for intelligence whereas the lower odds of an ADHD diagnosis with higher intelligence did not persist after adjustment for liability to greater educational attainment (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.68-1.56; p=0.87). The MR analysis of the effect of ADHD on socioeconomic markers found that genetic liability to ADHD was statistically associated with each of them (p<0.001) but not intelligence. However, the average change in the socioeconomic markers per doubling of the prevalence of ADHD corresponded only to 0.05-0.06 SD changes.
Our results indicate that an ADHD diagnosis may be a direct and strong intelligence-independent consequence of socioeconomic related factors, whereas ADHD appears to lead only to modestly lowered socioeconomic status. Low intelligence seems not to be a major independent cause or consequence of ADHD.
先前的研究报告称,注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)与较低的社会经济地位和智力有关。我们旨在通过双向两样本孟德尔随机化(MR)设计来评估这些关联的因果方向和强度。
我们使用来自最大的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总水平数据来识别 ADHD、智力和社会经济地位标志物的遗传工具,包括汤森剥夺指数、家庭收入和教育程度。使用逆方差加权回归对个体遗传变异的效应估计值进行合并。
遗传预测的汤森剥夺指数增加一个标准差(SD),ADHD 诊断的比值比(OR)为 5.29(95%置信区间(CI)1.89-14.76)(p<0.001)。遗传预测的一个 SD 更高的教育水平的 OR 为 0.30(95% CI 0.25-0.37)(p<0.001),而遗传预测的一个 SD 更高的家庭收入的 OR 为 0.35(95% CI 0.25-0.49;p<0.001)。这些关联在调整智力后仍然存在,而更高智力的 ADHD 诊断的较低几率在调整更高教育程度的易感性后并未持续(调整后的 OR 1.03,95% CI 0.68-1.56;p=0.87)。ADHD 对社会经济标志物影响的 MR 分析发现,ADHD 的遗传易感性与它们都存在统计学关联(p<0.001),但与智力无关。然而,每增加一倍 ADHD 的流行率,社会经济标志物的平均变化仅对应于 0.05-0.06 SD 的变化。
我们的结果表明,ADHD 诊断可能是社会经济相关因素的直接且强烈的与智力无关的后果,而 ADHD 似乎仅导致社会经济地位适度降低。低智力似乎不是 ADHD 的主要独立原因或后果。