Metzendorf Nicole G, Lange Lena Melanie, Lainer Nina, Schlüter Rabea, Dittmann Silvia, Paul Lena-Sophie, Troitzsch Daniel, Sievers Susanne
Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Microbial Physiology and Molecular Biology, Institute of Microbiology, Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;13:814692. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.814692. eCollection 2022.
The anaerobic bacterium represents one of the most problematic pathogens, especially in hospitals. Dysbiosis has been proven to largely reduce colonization resistance against this intestinal pathogen. The beneficial effect of the microbiota is closely associated with the metabolic activity of intestinal microbes such as the ability to transform primary bile acids into secondary ones. However, the basis and the molecular action of bile acids (BAs) on the pathogen are not well understood. We stressed the pathogen with the four most abundant human bile acids: cholic acid (CA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), deoxycholic acid (DCA) and lithocholic acid (LCA). Thin layer chromatography (TLC), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and electron microscopy (EM) were employed to track the enrichment and destination of bile acids in the bacterial cell. TLC not only revealed a strong accumulation of LCA in , but also indicated changes in the composition of membrane lipids in BA-treated cells. Furthermore, morphological changes induced by BAs were determined, most pronounced in the virtually complete loss of flagella in LCA-stressed cells and a flagella reduction after DCA and CDCA challenge. Quantification of both, protein and RNA of the main flagella component FliC proved the decrease in flagella to originate from a change in gene expression on transcriptional level. Notably, the loss of flagella provoked by LCA did not reduce adhesion ability of to Caco-2 cells. Most remarkably, extracellular toxin A levels in the presence of BAs showed a similar pattern as flagella expression. That is, CA did not affect toxin expression, whereas lower secretion of toxin A was determined in cells stressed with LCA, DCA or CDCA. In summary, the various BAs were shown to differentially modify virulence determinants, such as flagella expression, host cell adhesion and toxin synthesis. Our results indicate differences of BAs in cellular localization and impact on membrane composition, which could be a reason of their diverse effects. This study is a starting point in the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the differences in BA action, which in turn can be vital regarding the outcome of a infection.
厌氧细菌是最具问题的病原体之一,尤其是在医院环境中。已证明生态失调会大大降低对这种肠道病原体的定植抗性。微生物群的有益作用与肠道微生物的代谢活性密切相关,例如将初级胆汁酸转化为次级胆汁酸的能力。然而,胆汁酸(BAs)对病原体的作用基础和分子作用尚不清楚。我们用四种最丰富的人胆汁酸:胆酸(CA)、鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)、脱氧胆酸(DCA)和石胆酸(LCA)对病原体进行处理。采用薄层色谱法(TLC)、共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和电子显微镜(EM)来追踪胆汁酸在细菌细胞中的富集和去向。TLC不仅揭示了LCA在[具体细菌名称未给出]中的强烈积累,还表明了经BA处理的细胞中膜脂组成的变化。此外,确定了由BAs诱导的形态变化,最明显的是在LCA处理的细胞中几乎完全丧失鞭毛,以及在DCA和CDCA刺激后鞭毛减少。对主要鞭毛成分FliC的蛋白质和RNA进行定量分析,证明鞭毛的减少源于转录水平上基因表达的变化。值得注意的是,LCA引起的鞭毛丧失并未降低[具体细菌名称未给出]对Caco-2细胞的黏附能力。最显著的是,在存在BAs的情况下,细胞外毒素A水平呈现出与鞭毛表达相似的模式。也就是说,CA不影响毒素表达,而在用LCA、DCA或CDCA处理的细胞中,毒素A的分泌较低。总之,各种BAs被证明对毒力决定因素有不同的修饰作用,如鞭毛表达、宿主细胞黏附和毒素合成。我们的结果表明BAs在细胞定位和对膜组成的影响方面存在差异,这可能是它们产生不同作用的原因。本研究是阐明BA作用差异背后分子机制的起点,这反过来对于[具体细菌名称未给出]感染的结果可能至关重要。