Reinhold H S, Endrich B
Int J Hyperthermia. 1986 Apr-Jun;2(2):111-37. doi: 10.3109/02656738609012389.
A great number of investigators have, independently, shown that tumour blood flow is affected by a hyperthermic treatment to a larger extent than normal tissue blood flow. While the majority of the studies on experimental tumours show a decrease and even a lapse in blood flow within the microcirculation during or after hyperthermia, the data on human tumours are less conclusive. Some of the investigators do not find a decrease in circulation, while others do. Obviously, this is an important field of investigation in the clinical application of hyperthermia because a shut down of the circulation would not only facilitate tumour heating (by reducing venous outflow, this reducing the 'heat clearance' from the tumour), but would also facilitate tumour cell destruction. The same holds for alterations that occur subsequently to the circulatory changes, like a heat-induced decrease of tissue pO2 and pH. If the frequently reported circulatory collapse of the tumour circulation could selectively be stimulated by, e.g. acidification or by vasoactive agents, hyperthermic treatment of patients would possibly be greatly facilitated and intensified. In hyperthermic tumour therapy a number of complex processes and interactions takes place, especially when the treatment is performed in combination with radiation therapy. One of them represents the group of processes related to the random probability of cell sterilization of individual tumour cells resulting in exponential survival curves which are typically evaluated with e.g. cell survival assays. This aspect has not been the issue of this paper. The other group of processes deals with the heat-induced changes in the micro-physiology of tumours and normal tissues which, as discussed before, may not only enhance the exponential cell kill, but which may also culminate in vascular collapse with the ensuing necrosis of the tumour tissue in the areas affected. If this takes place, a process of bulk killing of tumour cells results, rather than the random type of cell sterilization. At present it is not clear to what extent the various separate mechanisms contribute to the total effect of tumour control. With all these considerations in mind, one should be aware of the fact that effects, secondary to heat-induced vascular stasis alone will never be efficient enough to eliminate all tumour cells, even though a heat reservoir is created. This is so because some malignant cells will inevitably have already infiltrated normal, surrounding structures and will therefore not be affected by changes in the tumour vascular bed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
大量研究人员独立表明,与正常组织血流相比,高温治疗对肿瘤血流的影响更大。虽然大多数关于实验性肿瘤的研究表明,在高温治疗期间或之后,微循环内的血流会减少甚至中断,但关于人类肿瘤的数据则不那么确凿。一些研究人员未发现循环减少,而另一些人则发现了。显然,这是高温治疗临床应用中的一个重要研究领域,因为循环停止不仅会促进肿瘤加热(通过减少静脉流出,从而减少肿瘤的“热清除”),还会促进肿瘤细胞的破坏。循环变化之后发生的改变,如热诱导的组织pO2和pH值降低,情况也是如此。如果经常报道的肿瘤循环崩溃能够通过例如酸化或血管活性药物选择性地被刺激,那么对患者的高温治疗可能会得到极大的促进和强化。在高温肿瘤治疗中会发生许多复杂的过程和相互作用,特别是当该治疗与放射治疗联合进行时。其中之一是与单个肿瘤细胞的随机杀灭概率相关的一组过程,这会导致指数存活曲线,通常通过例如细胞存活试验进行评估。这方面不是本文的主题。另一组过程涉及高温诱导的肿瘤和正常组织微观生理学变化,如前所述,这不仅可能增强指数性细胞杀伤,还可能最终导致血管崩溃,继而使受影响区域的肿瘤组织坏死。如果发生这种情况,就会导致大量肿瘤细胞被杀死,而不是随机类型的细胞杀灭。目前尚不清楚各种单独的机制在多大程度上对肿瘤控制的总体效果有贡献。考虑到所有这些因素,人们应该意识到,仅由热诱导的血管淤滞引起的效应永远不足以消除所有肿瘤细胞,即使形成了热库。之所以如此,是因为一些恶性细胞将不可避免地已经浸润到周围正常组织中,因此不会受到肿瘤血管床变化的影响。(摘要截选至400字)