Vargas Teresa, Damme Katherine S F, Osborne K Juston, Mittal Vijay A
Northwestern University Department of Psychology.
Northwestern University Department of Psychology, Northwestern University Department of Psychiatry, Northwestern University Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University Institute for Policy Research.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;10(2):291-309. doi: 10.1177/21677026211016415. Epub 2021 May 27.
Conceptualizations that distinguish systems-level stress exposures are lacking; the Stimulation (lack of safety and high attentional demands), Discrepancy (social exclusion and lack of belonging), and Deprivation (lack of environmental enrichment) (SDD) theory of psychosis and stressors occurring at the systems-level has not been directly tested.
Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 3,207 youth, and associations with psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) were explored.
Though model fit was suboptimal, five factors were defined, and four were consistent with the SDD theory, and related to PLEs. Objective and subjective/self-report exposures for showed significantly stronger PLE associations compared to and objective factors. Objective and subjective/self-report measures converged overall, though self-report exhibited a significantly stronger association with PLEs compared to objective .
Considering distinct system-level exposures could help clarify putative mechanisms and psychosis vulnerability. The preliminary approach potentially informs health policy efforts aimed at psychopathology prevention and intervention.
缺乏区分系统层面应激暴露的概念化方法;精神病的刺激(缺乏安全感和高注意力需求)、差异(社会排斥和归属感缺失)和剥夺(缺乏环境丰富性)(SDD)理论以及系统层面发生的应激源尚未得到直接检验。
对3207名青少年进行探索性因素分析,并探讨其与类精神病体验(PLEs)的关联。
尽管模型拟合效果欠佳,但定义了五个因素,其中四个与SDD理论一致,并与PLEs相关。与[未提及的因素1]和客观[未提及的因素2]因素相比,[未提及的因素3]的客观和主观/自我报告暴露与PLEs的关联显著更强。客观和主观/自我报告测量总体上趋于一致,尽管与客观[未提及的因素4]相比,自我报告[未提及的因素3]与PLEs的关联显著更强。
考虑不同的系统层面暴露可能有助于阐明假定的机制和精神病易感性。这种初步方法可能为旨在预防和干预精神病理学的卫生政策努力提供信息。