Prabhakar Akil, Kanthalu Subramanian Jeash Narayan, Swathikaa P, Kumareswaran S I, Subramanian K N
Department of Orthopaedics, Velammal Medical College and Research Institute, Velammal Village, Madurai-Tuticorin Ring Road, Anuppanadi, Tamil Nadu, 625009, India.
Velammal Medical College and Research Institute, Velammal Village, Madurai-Tuticorin Ring Road, Anuppanadi, Tamil Nadu, 625009, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Feb 18;28:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101808. eCollection 2022 May.
Among pathologies of the shoulder, rotator cuff tear is the most common. Diagnosis of cuff tear around mid twenties is unusual, but the prevalence increases significantly after the age of forty. The prevalence after the age of 60 is around 20-30%. A well recognised feature of cuff tear is being asymptomatic but, tear progression in asymptomatic is a known consequence. The spectrum of cuff tear ranges from partial, full thickness cuff tear with or without retraction. The mainstay of treatment for partial thickness cuff tear is systematic rehabilitation and for the full thickness cuff tear an initial rehabilitation is an accepted management. Failed rehabilitation for 3 months, acute traumatic tear, younger age, intractable pain, good quality muscle would be the indications for repair of a full thickness cuff tear. Though there are defined indications for surgical intervention in the full thickness rotator cuff tear, differentiating an asymptomatic tear that would not progress or identifying a tear that would become better with rehabilitation is an undeniable challenge for even the most experienced surgeon. Rehabilitation in cuff tear consists of strengthening the core stabilizers along with rotator cuff and deltoid muscles. In a symptomatic cuff tear that merits surgical intervention the objective is to do an anatomical foot print repair. In scenarios where the cuff is retracted, one has to settle for a medialised repair. As, a repair done in tension is more likely to fail than a tensionless medialised repair. The success rate of all these non anatomical procedures varies from series to series but it approximates around 60-80%. Augmenting cuff repair to enhance biological healing is a recent advance in rotator cuff repair surgery. The augmentation factors can be growth factors like PRP, scaffolds both auto and allografts. The outcome of these procedures from literature has been variable. As there are no major harmful effects, it can be viewed as another future step in bringing better outcomes to patients having rotator cuff tear surgery. Despite being the commonest shoulder pathology, the rotator cuff tear still remains as a condition with varied presenting features and a wide variety of management options. The goal of the treatment is to achieve pain free shoulders with good function. Correcting altered scapular kinematics by systematic rehabilitation of the shoulder would be the first choice in all partial thickness cuff tear and also as an initial management of full thickness cuff tears. Failure of rehabilitation would be the step forward for a surgical intervention. While embarking on a surgical procedure, correct patient selection, sound surgical technique, appropriate counselling about expected outcome are the most essential in patient satisfaction.
在肩部疾病中,肩袖撕裂最为常见。二十多岁左右诊断出肩袖撕裂并不常见,但四十岁以后患病率显著增加。60岁以后的患病率约为20%-30%。肩袖撕裂的一个公认特征是无症状,但无症状时撕裂进展是已知的后果。肩袖撕裂的范围从部分厚度撕裂到全层厚度撕裂,有或无回缩。部分厚度肩袖撕裂的主要治疗方法是系统康复,全层厚度肩袖撕裂的初始康复是公认的治疗方法。三个月康复失败、急性创伤性撕裂、年龄较轻、顽固性疼痛、肌肉质量良好是全层厚度肩袖撕裂修复的指征。尽管全层肩袖撕裂有明确的手术干预指征,但即使是最有经验的外科医生,区分不会进展的无症状撕裂或识别通过康复会好转的撕裂也是一项不可否认的挑战。肩袖撕裂的康复包括加强核心稳定肌以及肩袖和三角肌。在值得手术干预的有症状肩袖撕裂中,目标是进行解剖足迹修复。在肩袖回缩的情况下,不得不进行内侧化修复。因为,在张力下进行的修复比无张力的内侧化修复更有可能失败。所有这些非解剖手术的成功率因系列而异,但大致约为60%-80%。增强肩袖修复以促进生物愈合是肩袖修复手术的最新进展。增强因素可以是生长因子如PRP、自体和异体移植物支架。文献中这些手术的结果各不相同。由于没有重大有害影响,可以将其视为为肩袖撕裂手术患者带来更好结果的又一未来步骤。尽管肩袖撕裂是最常见的肩部疾病,但它仍然是一种具有多种表现特征和广泛治疗选择的疾病。治疗的目标是实现无痛且功能良好 的肩部。通过对肩部进行系统康复来纠正改变的肩胛骨运动学将是所有部分厚度肩袖撕裂的首选,也是全层厚度肩袖撕裂的初始治疗方法。康复失败将是进行手术干预的下一步。在进行手术时,正确的患者选择、完善的手术技术、关于预期结果的适当咨询是患者满意度的最重要因素。