Cossu Andrea, Graffieti Gabriele, Pellegrini Lorenzo, Maltoni Davide, Bacciu Davide, Carta Antonio, Lomonaco Vincenzo
Pervasive AI Lab, Computer Science Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Class of Science, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy.
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Mar 24;5:829842. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.829842. eCollection 2022.
The ability of a model to learn continually can be empirically assessed in different continual learning scenarios. Each scenario defines the constraints and the opportunities of the learning environment. Here, we challenge the current trend in the continual learning literature to experiment mainly on class-incremental scenarios, where classes present in one experience are never revisited. We posit that an excessive focus on this setting may be limiting for future research on continual learning, since class-incremental scenarios artificially exacerbate catastrophic forgetting, at the expense of other important objectives like forward transfer and computational efficiency. In many real-world environments, in fact, repetition of previously encountered concepts occurs naturally and contributes to softening the disruption of previous knowledge. We advocate for a more in-depth study of alternative continual learning scenarios, in which repetition is integrated by design in the stream of incoming information. Starting from already existing proposals, we describe the advantages such scenarios could offer for a more comprehensive assessment of continual learning models.
模型持续学习的能力可以在不同的持续学习场景中通过实证进行评估。每个场景都定义了学习环境的约束条件和机会。在此,我们对持续学习文献中的当前趋势提出质疑,即主要在类别增量场景下进行实验,在这种场景中,一次经历中出现的类别不会被再次涉及。我们认为,过度关注这种设置可能会限制持续学习的未来研究,因为类别增量场景人为地加剧了灾难性遗忘,却牺牲了诸如正向迁移和计算效率等其他重要目标。事实上,在许多现实世界环境中,先前遇到的概念会自然重复出现,并有助于减轻对先前知识的干扰。我们主张对替代的持续学习场景进行更深入的研究,在这些场景中,重复被设计整合到传入信息流中。从已有的提议出发,我们描述了此类场景可为更全面评估持续学习模型提供的优势。