Rogers John, Delany Clare, Wright Clive, Roberts-Thomson Kaye, Morgan Mike
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 24;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0638-8.
Dental general anaesthetics undertaken on young children are amongst the most common of all potentially preventable hospitalisations of children in Australia. They are costly for families and the community and entail some risk. The aim of the study was to explore the views of stakeholders about factors associated with children's dental general anaesthetics in Victoria, Australia and to identify policy implications.
Interviews with stakeholders were used to develop a framework of factors. Interview data were subject to qualitative analysis, informed by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Eight themes that encompassed 30 main factors were identified through focused discussions with 16 stakeholders. While the safety of dental general anaesthetics has improved and mortality rates are low, side effects are common. Push factors for children's dental general anaesthetics include a perceived greater 'child-focus'; preferred models of care; low oral health literacy; parent guilt; convenience; and some dentists reluctance to treat high needs children in the clinic. Factors that may decrease the prevalence of dental general anaesthetics include: prevention of dental caries; using alternative approaches; an appropriate workforce mix; enhancing oral health literacy; and development of guidelines.
The prevalence of hospitalisation of children to treat dental caries is increasing. Many factors influence the prevalence of paediatric dental general anaesthetics - relating to the child, parent, oral health professional, financial impact, health risk, and accessibility to facilities. There are quality of care and convenience benefits but also high costs and possible health risks. Family, workforce and health system factors have been identified that could decrease the prevalence of paediatric dental general anaesthetics.
在澳大利亚,对幼儿实施的牙科全身麻醉是所有儿童潜在可预防住院病例中最常见的情况之一。这对家庭和社区来说成本高昂,且存在一定风险。本研究的目的是探讨利益相关者对澳大利亚维多利亚州儿童牙科全身麻醉相关因素的看法,并确定政策含义。
通过与利益相关者进行访谈来构建一个因素框架。访谈数据采用解释现象学分析进行定性分析。
通过与16名利益相关者的重点讨论,确定了涵盖30个主要因素的八个主题。虽然牙科全身麻醉的安全性有所提高且死亡率较低,但副作用很常见。儿童牙科全身麻醉的推动因素包括:更高的“以儿童为中心”的认知;偏好的护理模式;口腔健康素养低;家长的内疚感;便利性;以及一些牙医不愿在诊所治疗高需求儿童。可能降低牙科全身麻醉发生率的因素包括:预防龋齿;采用替代方法;适当的劳动力组合;提高口腔健康素养;以及制定指南。
因治疗龋齿而住院的儿童人数正在增加。许多因素影响儿童牙科全身麻醉的发生率——涉及儿童、家长、口腔健康专业人员、经济影响、健康风险以及设施可及性。存在护理质量和便利性方面的益处,但也有高成本和可能的健康风险。已确定了可能降低儿童牙科全身麻醉发生率的家庭、劳动力和卫生系统因素。