• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分离性身份障碍中的分离性身份状态依赖工作记忆:一项对照功能磁共振成像研究。

Dissociative identity state-dependent working memory in dissociative identity disorder: a controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

作者信息

Vissia Eline M, Lawrence Andrew J, Chalavi Sima, Giesen Mechteld E, Draijer Nel, Nijenhuis Ellert R S, Aleman André, Veltman Dick J, Reinders Antje A T S

机构信息

Cognitive Neuroscience Centre, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; and Centre for Psychotrauma, Heelzorg, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2022 Apr 11;8(3):e82. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.22.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2022.22
PMID:35403592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9059616/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Memory function is at the core of the psychopathology of dissociative identity disorder (DID), but little is known about its psychobiological correlates.

AIMS

This study aims to investigate whether memory function in DID differs between dissociative identity states.

METHOD

Behavioural data and neural activation patterns were assessed in 92 sessions during an n-back working memory task. Participants were people with genuine diagnosed DID (n = 14), DID-simulating controls (n = 16) and a paired control group (post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 16), healthy controls (n = 16)). Both DID groups participated as authentic or simulated neutral and trauma-related identity states. Reaction times and errors of omission were analysed with repeated measures ANOVA. Working memory neural activation (main working memory and linear load) was investigated for effects of identity state, participant group and their interaction.

RESULTS

Identity state-dependent behavioural performance and neural activation was found. DID simulators made fewer errors of omission than those with genuine DID. Regarding the prefrontal parietal network, main working memory in the left frontal pole and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 44) was activated in all three simulated neutral states, and in trauma-related identity states of DID simulators, but not those with genuine DID or post-traumatic stress disorder; for linear load, trauma-related identity states of those with genuine DID did not engage the parietal regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioural performance and neural activation patterns related to working memory in DID are dependent on the dissociative identities involved. The narrowed consciousness of trauma-related identity states, with a proneness to re-experiencing traumatising events, may relate to poorer working memory functioning.

摘要

背景

记忆功能是分离性身份障碍(DID)心理病理学的核心,但对其心理生物学相关性知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在调查DID患者的记忆功能在分离性身份状态之间是否存在差异。

方法

在一项n-back工作记忆任务的92次测试中评估行为数据和神经激活模式。参与者包括确诊为真性DID的患者(n = 14)、模拟DID的对照组(n = 16)以及配对对照组(创伤后应激障碍患者(n = 16)、健康对照组(n = 16))。两个DID组均以真实或模拟的中性及创伤相关身份状态参与研究。采用重复测量方差分析对反应时间和漏报错误进行分析。研究工作记忆神经激活(主要工作记忆和线性负荷)在身份状态、参与者组及其交互作用方面的影响。

结果

发现了依赖于身份状态的行为表现和神经激活。模拟DID者的漏报错误比真性DID患者少。关于前额顶叶网络,在所有三种模拟中性状态以及模拟DID者的创伤相关身份状态下,左额极和腹外侧前额叶皮质(布罗德曼区44)的主要工作记忆被激活,但真性DID患者或创伤后应激障碍患者未出现这种情况;对于线性负荷,真性DID患者的创伤相关身份状态未激活顶叶区域。

结论

DID患者与工作记忆相关的行为表现和神经激活模式取决于所涉及的分离性身份。创伤相关身份状态下意识的狭窄以及易于再次体验创伤性事件,可能与较差的工作记忆功能有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94e/9059616/2dd492b48661/S2056472422000229_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94e/9059616/21d294df233a/S2056472422000229_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94e/9059616/2dd492b48661/S2056472422000229_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94e/9059616/21d294df233a/S2056472422000229_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c94e/9059616/2dd492b48661/S2056472422000229_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissociative identity state-dependent working memory in dissociative identity disorder: a controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging study.分离性身份障碍中的分离性身份状态依赖工作记忆:一项对照功能磁共振成像研究。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Apr 11;8(3):e82. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.22.
2
Neural correlates of enhanced working-memory performance in dissociative disorder: a functional MRI study.分离性障碍中工作记忆表现增强的神经关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Psychol Med. 2007 Feb;37(2):235-45. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706008932. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
3
Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder resolved: A behavioural and neurobiological study.分离性身份障碍中的身份间遗忘症的解决:一项行为和神经生物学研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jun;174:220-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.026. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Sleep, trauma, fantasy and cognition in dissociative identity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and healthy controls: a replication and extension study.分离性身份障碍、创伤后应激障碍及健康对照中的睡眠、创伤、幻想与认知:一项重复及扩展研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 13;11(1):1705599. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1705599. eCollection 2020.
5
Fact or factitious? A psychobiological study of authentic and simulated dissociative identity states.真实还是人为?对真实和模拟分离性身份状态的心理生物学研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039279. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
6
Is it Trauma- or Fantasy-based? Comparing dissociative identity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, simulators, and controls.是创伤还是幻想?比较分离性身份障碍、创伤后应激障碍、模拟器和对照组。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134(2):111-28. doi: 10.1111/acps.12590. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Neurophysiological correlates of increased verbal working memory in high-dissociative participants: a functional MRI study.高分离性参与者言语工作记忆增强的神经生理学关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究
Psychol Med. 2005 Feb;35(2):175-85. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704002971.
8
Identity state-dependent self-relevance and emotional intensity ratings of words in dissociative identity disorder: A controlled longitudinal study.身份状态相关的自我相关性和分离性身份障碍患者对词语的情绪强度评定:一项对照纵向研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3208. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3208. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
9
Psychobiological characteristics of dissociative identity disorder: a symptom provocation study.分离性身份障碍的心理生物学特征:一项症状激发研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Oct 1;60(7):730-40. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.019.
10
Dissociative part-dependent resting-state activity in dissociative identity disorder: a controlled FMRI perfusion study.分离性身份障碍中与分离部分相关的静息态活动:一项对照功能磁共振成像灌注研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e98795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098795. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociative experiences alter resting state functional connectivity after childhood abuse.童年期受虐后,分离性体验会改变静息态功能连接。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):4095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79023-9.
2
[Trauma and memory-A contribution to the current debate in law and psychotherapy].[创伤与记忆——对当前法律与心理治疗领域辩论的一项贡献]
Nervenarzt. 2024 Jul;95(7):608-615. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01665-x. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
The integrative process promoted by EMDR in dissociative disorders: neurobiological mechanisms, psychometric tools, and intervention efficacy on the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarkers of Pathological Dissociation: A Systematic Review.病理性分离的生物标志物:一项系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr;123:120-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Dissociative identity disorder: out of the shadows at last?分离性身份障碍:终于走出阴影?
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;219(2):413-414. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.168.
3
Aiding the diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder: pattern recognition study of brain biomarkers.辅助诊断分离性身份障碍:脑生物标志物的模式识别研究。
眼动脱敏再处理疗法(EMDR)在分离性障碍中促进的整合过程:神经生物学机制、心理测量工具以及对2019冠状病毒病大流行心理影响的干预效果
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 1;14:1164527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164527. eCollection 2023.
4
Identity state-dependent self-relevance and emotional intensity ratings of words in dissociative identity disorder: A controlled longitudinal study.身份状态相关的自我相关性和分离性身份障碍患者对词语的情绪强度评定:一项对照纵向研究。
Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3208. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3208. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Biomarkers of dissociation.分离的生物标志物。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Jul 3;9(4):e119. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.511.
6
: a summary of growth and vision for my second innings as editor-in-chief.我作为主编第二任期的成长与愿景总结。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Mar 23;9(2):e55. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.35.
7
Deconstructing dissociation: a triple network model of trauma-related dissociation and its subtypes.解构解离:创伤相关解离及其亚型的三重网络模型。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Dec;47(13):2261-2270. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01468-1. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
8
Functional Neuroimaging in Dissociative Disorders: A Systematic Review.分离性障碍的功能性神经影像学:一项系统综述。
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 29;12(9):1405. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091405.
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;215(3):536-544. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.255.
4
Neurodevelopmental origins of abnormal cortical morphology in dissociative identity disorder.分离性身份障碍异常皮质形态的神经发育起源。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):157-170. doi: 10.1111/acps.12839. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Is it Trauma- or Fantasy-based? Comparing dissociative identity disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, simulators, and controls.是创伤还是幻想?比较分离性身份障碍、创伤后应激障碍、模拟器和对照组。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Aug;134(2):111-28. doi: 10.1111/acps.12590. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
The Psychobiology of Authentic and Simulated Dissociative Personality States: The Full Monty.真实与模拟解离性人格状态的心理生物学:全方位剖析
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Jun;204(6):445-57. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000522.
7
The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions: fundamental questions and strategies for future research.情绪-认知相互作用的神经生物学:基本问题与未来研究策略。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 17;9:58. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00058. eCollection 2015.
8
Similar cortical but not subcortical gray matter abnormalities in women with posttraumatic stress disorder with versus without dissociative identity disorder.创伤后应激障碍伴与不伴分离性身份障碍的女性患者存在类似的皮质而非皮质下灰质异常。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 30;231(3):308-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
9
Abnormal hippocampal morphology in dissociative identity disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder correlates with childhood trauma and dissociative symptoms.分离性身份障碍和创伤后应激障碍中异常的海马形态与童年创伤及分离症状相关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 May;36(5):1692-704. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22730. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
10
A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍神经认知功能的定量荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):105-140. doi: 10.1037/a0038039. Epub 2014 Nov 3.