Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0040822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00408-22. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is routinely used for the identification of bacterial isolates. However, this method is still performed mostly in more-specialized reference laboratories, and traditional protocols can be labor intensive. In this study, 99 clinical bacterial isolates were used to validate a fast, simplified, and largely automated protocol for 16S sequencing. The workflow combines real-time PCR of the first 500 bp of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and amplicon sequencing on an automated, cartridge-based sequence analyzer. Sequence analysis, NCBI BLAST search, and result interpretation were performed using an automated R-based script. The automated workflow and R analysis described here produced results equal to those of manual sequence analysis. Of the 96 sequences with adequate quality, 90 were concordantly identified to the genus ( = 62) or species level ( = 28) compared with routine laboratory identification of the organism. One organism identification was discordant, and 5 resulted in an inconclusive identification. For sequences that gave a valid result, the overall accuracy of identification to at least the genus level was 98.9%. This simplified sequencing protocol provides a standardized approach to clinical 16S sequencing, analysis, and quality control that would be suited to frontline clinical microbiology laboratories with minimal experience. Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene is widely used as a diagnostic tool for bacterial identification, especially in cases where routine diagnostic methods fail to provide an identification, for organisms that are difficult to culture, or from specimens where cultures remain negative. Our simplified protocol is tailored toward use in frontline laboratories with little to no experience with sequencing. It provides a highly automated workflow that can deliver fast results with little hands-on time. Implementing 16S sequencing in-house saves additional time that is otherwise required to send out isolates/specimens for identification to reference laboratories. This makes results available much faster to physicians who can in turn initiate or adjust patient treatment accordingly.
16S rRNA 基因的 Sanger 测序通常用于鉴定细菌分离株。然而,这种方法仍然主要在更专业的参考实验室中进行,传统的方案可能非常繁琐。在这项研究中,我们使用 99 株临床细菌分离株来验证一种快速、简化且主要自动化的 16S 测序方案。该工作流程将细菌 16S rRNA 基因前 500bp 的实时 PCR 与自动化、基于盒式的测序仪上的扩增子测序相结合。序列分析、NCBI BLAST 搜索和结果解释使用基于 R 的自动脚本进行。这里描述的自动化工作流程和 R 分析产生的结果与手动序列分析的结果相当。在具有足够质量的 96 个序列中,与常规实验室对该生物的鉴定相比,90 个序列被一致鉴定为属( = 62)或种水平( = 28)。一个生物鉴定不一致,5 个鉴定结果不确定。对于给出有效结果的序列,至少鉴定到属水平的总体准确性为 98.9%。这种简化的测序方案为临床 16S 测序、分析和质量控制提供了一种标准化方法,非常适合经验有限的一线临床微生物学实验室。16S rRNA 基因的 Sanger 测序广泛用作细菌鉴定的诊断工具,特别是在常规诊断方法无法提供鉴定结果、难以培养的生物或培养物仍为阴性的标本的情况下。我们的简化方案针对几乎没有测序经验的一线实验室进行了定制。它提供了一种高度自动化的工作流程,可以快速提供结果,只需很少的人工干预时间。在内部进行 16S 测序可以节省将分离物/标本发送到参考实验室进行鉴定所需的额外时间。这使得医生可以更快地获得结果,从而相应地开始或调整患者的治疗。