Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):232-237. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2021.0103. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Brucellosis remains an important public health problem in many developing countries. This study examines the serum levels of endocan, a novel immune-inflammatory marker, in this potentially difficult to diagnose disease, and their predictive diagnostic value. Fifty patients under follow-up with diagnoses of brucellosis between May 1, 2020, and December 1, 2020, and 50 healthy individuals constituting the control group were included in the study. Cases were classified as acute, subacute, or chronic, depending on the duration of their symptoms. Patients' plasma specimens were collected before the initiation of brucellosis treatment. Serum endocan levels were higher among the patients with brucellosis than in the healthy control group ( < 0.001). Endocan levels also differed significantly among the patients with acute, subacute, and chronic brucellosis ( < 0.001 for all). Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in the patients with acute, subacute, and chronic brucellosis revealed a significant difference only in terms of CRP levels between the acute and chronic patients ( = 0.018). No significant association was observed between serum endocan levels and growth in blood culture or serum agglutination test results in the patients with brucellosis ( > 0.05). However, a significant correlation was found between patients' CRP and ESR values and endocan levels ( = 0.572, and = 0.415, respectively, < 0.001). At a cutoff value of 597.35 pg/mL, serum endocan levels exhibited 90% sensitivity and 85% specificity in differentiating patients diagnosed with brucellosis from healthy individuals (area under the curve = 0.927, < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.877-0.977). Endocan may be a useful guide in differentiating patients with brucellosis from healthy individuals, and in distinguishing between acute, subacute, and chronic brucellosis. Ethics committee approval No: B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/203.
布鲁氏菌病仍然是许多发展中国家的一个重要公共卫生问题。本研究探讨了新型免疫炎症标志物内脂素在这种诊断困难的疾病中的血清水平及其预测诊断价值。
2020 年 5 月 1 日至 12 月 1 日期间,我们对 50 例经诊断患有布鲁氏菌病并接受随访的患者和 50 例健康个体进行了研究。根据症状持续时间,病例分为急性、亚急性或慢性。采集患者治疗前的血浆标本。
患有布鲁氏菌病的患者血清内脂素水平高于健康对照组(<0.001)。急性、亚急性和慢性布鲁氏菌病患者的内脂素水平也有显著差异(所有<0.001)。比较急性、亚急性和慢性布鲁氏菌病患者的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR),仅在急性和慢性患者之间 CRP 水平存在显著差异(=0.018)。在患有布鲁氏菌病的患者中,血清内脂素水平与血培养或血清凝集试验结果的生长之间未观察到显著相关性(>0.05)。然而,我们发现患者的 CRP 和 ESR 值与内脂素水平之间存在显著相关性(=0.572 和=0.415,分别为<0.001)。内脂素血清水平的截断值为 597.35pg/mL 时,可区分诊断为布鲁氏菌病的患者和健康个体,其灵敏度为 90%,特异性为 85%(曲线下面积=0.927,<0.001,95%置信区间=0.877-0.977)。
内脂素可能有助于区分布鲁氏菌病患者和健康个体,以及区分急性、亚急性和慢性布鲁氏菌病。
B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/203。