Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Med Qual. 2022;37(5):379-387. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000054. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
Although most health care occurs in the ambulatory setting, limited research examines how providers and patients think about and enact ambulatory patient safety. This multimethod qualitative study seeks to identify perceived challenges and strategies to improve ambulatory safety from the perspectives of clinicians, staff, and patients. Data included interviews (N = 101), focus groups (N = 65), and observations of safety processes (N = 79) collected from 10 patient-centered medical homes. Key safety issues included the lack of interoperability among health information systems, clinician-patient communication failures, and challenges with medication reconciliation. Commonly cited safety strategies leveraged health information systems or involved dedicated resources (eg, providing access to social workers). Patients also identified strategies not mentioned by clinicians, emphasizing the need for their involvement in developing safety solutions. This work provides insight into safety issues of greatest concern to clinicians, staff, and patients and strategies to improve safety in the ambulatory setting.
尽管大多数医疗保健都发生在门诊环境中,但关于提供者和患者如何思考和实施门诊患者安全的研究有限。这项多方法定性研究旨在从临床医生、工作人员和患者的角度确定感知到的挑战和改善门诊安全的策略。数据包括从 10 个以患者为中心的医疗之家收集的访谈(N=101)、焦点小组(N=65)和安全流程观察(N=79)。主要安全问题包括卫生信息系统之间缺乏互操作性、临床医生与患者沟通失败以及药物重整方面的挑战。常被提及的安全策略利用了卫生信息系统或涉及专门资源(例如,提供社会工作者的访问权限)。患者还确定了临床医生未提及的策略,强调需要他们参与制定安全解决方案。这项工作深入了解了临床医生、工作人员和患者最关心的安全问题,以及改善门诊环境安全的策略。