Farfour Eric, Le Brun Cecile, Mizrahi Assaf, Bargain Pauline, Durieux Marie-Fleur, Boquel Frédérique, Corvec Stéphane, Jeddi Fakhri, Muggeo Anaëlle, Huguenin Antoine, Barraud Olivier, Amara Marlène, Fihman Vincent, Bailly Eric, Botterel Françoise, Guillard Thomas, Vasse Marc
Service de biologie clinique, Hôpital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France.
Service de microbiologie, CHU Bretonneau, 37000 Tours, France.
Med Mycol. 2022 Apr 29;60(4). doi: 10.1093/mmy/myac021.
Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, some Candida strains, mainly Candida glabrata, can be recovered from anaerobic blood culture vials. We assessed the contribution of the anaerobic vials for the diagnosis of candidemia, especially for C. glabrata. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including eight university or regional hospitals. A single episode of monomicrobial candidemia per patient was included from September 1st, 2016, to August 31st, 2019. The characteristics of all aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials sampled within 2 h before and after the first positive blood culture vials were recorded (type of vials, result, and for positive vials time-to-positivity and Candida species). Overall, 509 episodes of candidemia were included. The main species were C. albicans (55.6%) followed by C. glabrata (17.1%), C. parapsilosis (4.9%), and C. tropicalis (4.5%). An anaerobic vial was positive in 76 (14.9%) of all episodes of which 56 (73.8%) were due to C. glabrata. The number of C. glabrata infections only positive in anaerobic vials was 1 (2.6%), 1 (11.1%), and 15 (37.5%) with the BACT/ALERT 3D the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO and the BACTEC FX instrument, respectively (P < 0.01). The initial positivity of an anaerobic vial was highly predictive of the isolation of C. glabrata with the BACTEC FX (sensitivity of 96.8%). C. glabrata time-to-positivity was shorter in anaerobic vial than aerobic vial with all instruments. Anaerobic blood culture vials improve the recovery of Candida spp mainly C. glabrata. This study could be completed by further analyses including mycological and pediatric vials.
Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, C. glabrata is able to grow in anaerobic conditions. In blood culture, the time-to-positivity of C. glabrata is shorter in anaerobic than aerobic vials. Only the anaerobic vial was positive in up to 15 (37.5%) C. glabrata bloodstream infections.
虽然念珠菌属是需氧微生物,但一些念珠菌菌株,主要是光滑念珠菌,可从厌氧血培养瓶中分离出来。我们评估了厌氧血培养瓶对念珠菌血症诊断的贡献,特别是对光滑念珠菌的诊断贡献。我们开展了一项多中心回顾性研究,纳入了八所大学或地区医院。纳入2016年9月1日至2019年8月31日期间每位患者的单次单微生物念珠菌血症发作。记录首次阳性血培养瓶前后2小时内采集的所有需氧和厌氧血培养瓶的特征(培养瓶类型、结果,对于阳性培养瓶,记录阳性时间和念珠菌种类)。总体而言,共纳入509例念珠菌血症发作。主要菌种为白色念珠菌(55.6%),其次是光滑念珠菌(17.1%)、近平滑念珠菌(4.9%)和热带念珠菌(4.5%)。在所有发作中,76例(14.9%)的厌氧血培养瓶呈阳性,其中56例(73.8%)是由光滑念珠菌引起的。仅厌氧血培养瓶呈阳性的光滑念珠菌感染病例数,使用BACT/ALERT 3D仪器的为1例(2.6%),使用BACT/ALERT VIRTUO仪器的为1例(11.1%),使用BACTEC FX仪器的为15例(37.5%)(P<0.01)。使用BACTEC FX仪器时,厌氧血培养瓶的初始阳性对光滑念珠菌的分离具有高度预测性(敏感性为96.8%)。使用所有仪器时,光滑念珠菌在厌氧血培养瓶中的阳性时间均短于需氧血培养瓶。厌氧血培养瓶提高了念珠菌属的分离率,主要是光滑念珠菌。本研究可通过包括真菌学和儿科培养瓶在内的进一步分析来完善。
虽然念珠菌属是需氧微生物,但光滑念珠菌能够在厌氧条件下生长。在血培养中,光滑念珠菌在厌氧血培养瓶中的阳性时间短于需氧血培养瓶。在多达15例(37.5%)的光滑念珠菌血流感染中,仅厌氧血培养瓶呈阳性。