J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):852. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000397.
Reports an error in "Interdependence and cooperation in daily life" by Simon Columbus, Catherine Molho, Francesca Righetti and Daniel Balliet (, 2021[Mar], Vol 120[3], 626-650). In the article (https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000253), due to a mistake in generating Figure 4, two histograms were distorted as the tallest bar in each histogram was completely omitted. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-44813-001.) Philosophers and scientists have long debated the nature of human social interactions and the prevalence of mutual dependence, conflict of interests, and power asymmetry in social situations. Yet, there is surprisingly little empirical work documenting the patterns of interdependence that people experience in daily life. We use experience sampling to study how people think about 3 dimensions of interdependence in daily life and how these dimensions relate to cooperation. In Study 1, 139 romantic couples ( = 278) reported on situations experienced with their partner ( = 6,766); in Study 2, individuals ( = 284) reported on situations experienced with any other person ( = 7,248), over the course of 1 week. Across both samples, we found that most social interactions were perceived as containing moderate mutual dependence, equal power, and corresponding interests. When couples reported on the same situation (Study 1), they largely agreed on their experienced interdependence and cooperation, suggesting that their reports reflect an underlying shared reality. In daily interactions across both samples, higher mutual dependence and lower conflict of interests were associated with more cooperation, whereas relative power was not directly related to cooperation. These associations replicated in laboratory experiments (Study 2). In daily life, high mutual dependence and high relative power exacerbated the negative relation between conflict of interests and cooperation. Finally, prevalent patterns of interdependence and the experience of specific interdependent situations affected multiple relationship outcomes. Our findings stress the importance of studying a diverse array of interdependent situations-and especially situations with corresponding interests-to better understand cooperation in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
报告了西蒙·哥伦布（Simon Columbus）、凯瑟琳·莫霍（Catherine Molho）、弗朗西斯卡·里杰蒂（Francesca Righetti）和丹尼尔·巴利特（Daniel Balliet）发表的《日常生活中的相互依存与合作》（2021 年 3 月，第 120 卷，第 626-650 页）中的一个错误。在文章（https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000253）中，由于生成图 4 时出现错误，每个直方图中的最高条形图完全被省略，导致两个直方图变形。本文的在线版本已得到更正。（原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2020-44813-001 中。）哲学家和科学家长期以来一直在争论人类社会互动的本质以及社会情境中相互依存、利益冲突和权力不对称的普遍程度。然而，很少有实证研究记录人们在日常生活中经历的相互依存模式。我们使用经验抽样来研究人们如何看待日常生活中相互依存的三个维度，以及这些维度如何与合作相关。在研究 1 中，139 对浪漫情侣（=278）报告了与伴侣一起经历的情况（=6766）；在研究 2 中，284 名个体（=284）报告了与任何其他人一起经历的情况（=7248），在一周的时间里。在两个样本中，我们发现大多数社会互动被认为包含适度的相互依存、平等的权力和相应的利益。当情侣们报告同一个情况时（研究 1），他们在经历的相互依存和合作方面基本达成一致，这表明他们的报告反映了一个潜在的共同现实。在两个样本的日常互动中，更高的相互依存和更低的利益冲突与更多的合作相关，而相对权力与合作没有直接关系。这些关联在实验室实验中得到了复制（研究 2）。在日常生活中，高相互依存和高相对权力加剧了利益冲突与合作之间的负相关关系。最后，普遍的相互依存模式和特定相互依存情况的体验影响了多种关系结果。我们的研究结果强调了研究各种相互依存情况的重要性，尤其是具有相应利益的情况，以更好地理解日常生活中的合作。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2022 APA，保留所有权利）。
