Ahn Hyejin, Lee Miran, Shin Hyeri, Chung Heajung-Angie, Park Yoo-Kyoung
Department of Gerontology (AgeTech-Service Convergence Major), Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.
Department of Medical Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.
Foods. 2022 Apr 6;11(7):1050. doi: 10.3390/foods11071050.
This study evaluates whether blood glucose response differs upon consuming rice cooked in a carbohydrate (carb)-reducing rice cooker. Rice cooked this way exhibited 19% reduced total carbohydrate (34.0 ± 0.3 vs. 27.6 ± 0.9 g/100 g rice) and 20% reduced total calorie (149.0 ± 1.0 vs. 120.8 ± 3.7 kcal/100 g rice) contents. We measured the blood glucose response (at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min) in 13 healthy participants after consuming 6 different rice types: regular white rice (regular WR, 50 g of available carbohydrate (AC)), low-carb WR with equivalent weight as regular WR (low-carb WR (EW)), low-carb WR with equivalent carb as regular WR (low-carb WR (EC), regular mixed-grain rice (regular MR), low-carb MR (EW) as regular MR, and low-carb MR (EC) as regular MR. All rice samples were prepared in an electric carb-reducing rice cooker. Postprandial blood glucose, sensory, and appetite were assessed after each test meal. The incremental area under the curve of 15 and 30 min after rice consumption was significantly lower in low-carb WR (EW) than that in regular WR. These results suggest possible health benefits of low-carb WR in reducing early postprandial spikes in blood glucose level without significant differences in satiety and satisfaction.
本研究评估了食用在碳水化合物减少型电饭煲中煮出的米饭后,血糖反应是否有所不同。以这种方式煮出的米饭总碳水化合物含量降低了19%(34.0±0.3克/100克米饭对27.6±0.9克/100克米饭),总热量含量降低了20%(149.0±1.0千卡/100克米饭对120.8±3.7千卡/100克米饭)。我们测量了13名健康参与者在食用6种不同类型米饭后0、15、30、45、60、90和120分钟时的血糖反应:普通白米(普通WR,50克可利用碳水化合物(AC))、与普通WR重量相当的低碳水WR(低碳水WR(EW))、与普通WR碳水化合物相当的低碳水WR(低碳水WR(EC))、普通混合谷物米饭(普通MR)、与普通MR重量相当的低碳水MR(低碳水MR(EW))以及与普通MR碳水化合物相当的低碳水MR(低碳水MR(EC))。所有米饭样本均在电动碳水化合物减少型电饭煲中制备。在每餐测试后评估餐后血糖、感官和食欲。食用米饭后15和30分钟的曲线下增量面积,低碳水WR(EW)显著低于普通WR。这些结果表明,低碳水WR在降低餐后早期血糖峰值方面可能具有健康益处,但在饱腹感和满意度方面无显著差异。