Department of Pharmaceutical Medicine and Regulatory Sciences, College of Medicine and Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3786. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073786.
Background: The introduction of new vaccines has been delayed in some countries in the Asia-Pacific region, which has led to delays in accessing vaccines for target patients. However, the approval lag of vaccines in the Asia-Pacific region has not been assessed. The objective of this study is to assess the availability and approval lag of vaccines in Asia-Pacific countries and compare them among Asia-Pacific countries, the United States (US), and Europe (EU). Methods: The information on vaccines prequalified by the World Health Organization (WHO) between 2010 and 2019 was obtained primarily from the WHO website. The date of approval of the WHO prequalified vaccine in Australia, India, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, the US, and EU was retrieved from the official website of national regulatory agencies. The vaccines were divided into two groups based on their first approval pathway, that is, vaccines that were first approved by SRA (Stringent Regulatory Authority including the US, EU, and WHO) and those that were first approved by non-SRA. The absolute approval lag represented the availability of the vaccine. Relative approval lag represented the lag time between the approval date of the country of interest and the first global approval date and was measured as the median approval lag. A Mann−Whitney U test was used to examine statistical differences between relative approval lag between the SRA first and the non-SRA first groups. Results: A total of 92 vaccines were prequalified by the WHO between 2010 and 2019, but only 61 vaccines were included in the analysis. Over 50% of vaccines were first licensed by non-SRAs. Of all the WHO-prequalified vaccines, the median approval lag in the ASEAN countries in this study was longer than those in the US and EU, with a median of 30 months in Australia, 15 months in South Korea, 52 months in Thailand, and 23 months in Singapore, compared to 0 months in the US and EU. The differences in approval lags between SRA first vaccines and non-SRA first vaccines were statistically significant in South Korea and Thailand (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The approval lag of vaccines was observed in the Asia-Pacific region, indicating a gap between the Asia-pacific region and the US and EU in regard to access to new vaccines. Future studies need to analyze the background factors related to the gap in availability and vaccine approval lag in the Asia-Pacific region and assess the impact of vaccine approval lag in the region.
亚太地区的一些国家推迟了新疫苗的引进,导致目标患者无法及时获得疫苗。然而,尚未评估亚太地区疫苗的批准滞后情况。本研究旨在评估亚太国家疫苗的可及性和批准滞后情况,并在亚太国家、美国和欧洲之间进行比较。方法:主要从世界卫生组织(WHO)网站获取 2010 年至 2019 年期间获得世卫组织资格预审的疫苗信息。从澳大利亚、印度、韩国、泰国、新加坡、马来西亚、美国和欧盟国家监管机构的官方网站检索到 WHO 资格预审疫苗的批准日期。根据其首次批准途径将疫苗分为两组,即首次由严格监管机构(包括美国、欧盟和世卫组织)批准的疫苗和首次由非严格监管机构批准的疫苗。绝对批准滞后表示疫苗的可及性。相对批准滞后表示感兴趣国家的批准日期与全球首次批准日期之间的滞后时间,并以中位数批准滞后来衡量。采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较严格监管机构和非严格监管机构首次批准组之间的相对批准滞后差异。结果:2010 年至 2019 年期间,共有 92 种疫苗获得世卫组织资格预审,但仅纳入 61 种疫苗进行分析。超过 50%的疫苗首次由非严格监管机构授权。在所有世卫组织资格预审的疫苗中,本研究中东盟国家的中位批准滞后时间长于美国和欧盟,澳大利亚为 30 个月,韩国为 15 个月,泰国为 52 个月,新加坡为 23 个月,而美国和欧盟为 0 个月。在韩国和泰国,严格监管机构和非严格监管机构首次批准疫苗的批准滞后差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:在亚太地区观察到疫苗的批准滞后,表明亚太地区与美国和欧盟在获得新疫苗方面存在差距。未来的研究需要分析与亚太地区疫苗供应和批准滞后差距相关的背景因素,并评估该地区疫苗批准滞后的影响。