• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进社区居住的老年人口终末期护理讨论和记录的因素:一项横断面研究。

Factors That Facilitate Discussion and Documentation of End-of-Life Care among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Division of Nursing Science, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.

Department of Medicine for Integrated Approach to Social Inclusion, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074273.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074273
PMID:35409955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8998236/
Abstract

We aimed to clarify the regional cultural characteristics in areas with different death rates at home, and to identify factors that influence the discussion and documentation of end-of-life care (EOLC) among community-dwelling older adults. This study was a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire survey, and participants were Japanese older adults. A chi-square test and multiple regression analysis were conducted. Among the 227 respondents, 143 were analyzed. There were no statistical differences by area. Participants who had intentions to discuss EOLC tended to discuss EOLC with their families and family doctors and tended to create documents to show their wills on EOLC (p < 0.05). The following factors that influence the intentions to discuss EOLC were extracted: experience in providing EOLC; information on EOLC; having religious and spiritual beliefs, and not avoiding the subject of death as part of beliefs related to life and death. These results indicate that beliefs and intentions regarding EOLC may be similar across Japan. Moreover, our findings suggest that to increase the interest of older adults on EOLC, it is important to provide opportunities for older adults to share and discuss information about EOLC with healthcare professionals and others who have experience providing EOLC.

摘要

我们旨在阐明国内不同死亡率地区的区域文化特征,并确定影响社区居住的老年人群体讨论和记录临终关怀(EOLC)的因素。这项研究采用横断面研究,使用自我管理的问卷调查,参与者为日本老年人。进行了卡方检验和多元回归分析。在 227 名应答者中,分析了 143 名。各地区之间没有统计学差异。有讨论 EOLC 意向的参与者倾向于与家人和家庭医生讨论 EOLC,并倾向于创建文件以显示他们对 EOLC 的意愿(p<0.05)。提取出影响讨论 EOLC 意向的以下因素:提供 EOLC 的经验;EOLC 信息;有宗教和精神信仰,并且不回避与生死有关的信仰中的死亡主题。这些结果表明,日本各地对 EOLC 的信仰和意图可能相似。此外,我们的研究结果表明,为了提高老年人对 EOLC 的兴趣,重要的是为老年人提供与提供 EOLC 经验的医疗保健专业人员和其他人分享和讨论 EOLC 信息的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc2/8998236/45870115b099/ijerph-19-04273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc2/8998236/45870115b099/ijerph-19-04273-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc2/8998236/45870115b099/ijerph-19-04273-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors That Facilitate Discussion and Documentation of End-of-Life Care among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.促进社区居住的老年人口终末期护理讨论和记录的因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074273.
2
A content analysis of forms, guidelines, and other materials documenting end-of-life care in intensive care units.对重症监护病房临终关怀相关表格、指南及其他文件资料的内容分析。
J Crit Care. 2004 Jun;19(2):108-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.05.001.
3
Place of Death for Persons With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the United States.美国认知障碍患者和非认知障碍患者的死亡地点。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):924-931. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16979. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Church-Based Health Promotion Focused on Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care at Black Baptist Churches: A Cross-Sectional Survey.以黑人浸信会教堂为基础、聚焦于预立医疗计划和临终关怀的健康促进:一项横断面调查
J Palliat Med. 2016 Feb;19(2):190-4. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0319.
5
Perspectives of physicians and nurses regarding end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.医生和护士对重症监护病房临终关怀的看法。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 Feb;27(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/0885066610393465. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
6
Preferences for end-of-life care and decision-making among Chinese community-dwelling older adults: A comparative cross-sectional study in Hong Kong and Wuhan in China.中国社区居住老年人临终关怀偏好与决策:中国香港和武汉的比较横断面研究
Nurs Health Sci. 2023 Mar;25(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12990. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Conflict Experienced by Nurses Providing End-of-life Care in Emergency Departments in Japan.日本急诊科提供临终护理的护士所经历的冲突。
J Trauma Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;26(3):154-163. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000441.
8
Factors Related to End-of-Life Care Discussions Among Community-Dwelling People in Japan.日本社区居民临终关怀讨论的相关因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Apr;63(4):539-547. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.011. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Effectiveness of Educational Programs on Palliative and End-of-life Care in Promoting Perceived Competence Among Health and Social Care Professionals.姑息与临终关怀教育项目在提升健康和社会护理专业人员感知能力方面的有效性。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jan;39(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/10499091211038501. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-post-evaluation of a dementia-specific advance care planning toolkit for Japanese primary care clinicians.痴呆症特定的预先-事后评估的初级保健临床医生使用的预先护理计划工具包。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3171-3178. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19040. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a video-based advance care planning intervention in hospitalized elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.基于视频的预先医疗照护计划干预对住院老年患者的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Jun;21(6):478-484. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14158. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.
3
Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives: A Multimedia Education Program in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
预先医疗照护计划和预先指示:社区居住的老年群体的多媒体教育计划。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):811-819. doi: 10.1177/0733464819831596. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Interventions Guiding Advance Care Planning Conversations: A Systematic Review.干预措施指导预先医疗照护计划的讨论:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):227-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons.系统评价预先医疗照护计划的概述:证据总结与全球经验教训。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):436-459.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Shared Decision-Making for Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.护理实践中的共同决策:一项综合综述。
Open Nurs J. 2018 Jan 22;12:1-14. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010001. eCollection 2018.
7
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
8
Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors.关于终末期癌症护理地点的决策:丧亲家庭的负担及相关因素
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
9
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
10
The determinants of home and nursing home death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.家庭和养老院死亡的决定因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 20;15:8. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0077-8.