• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于终末期癌症护理地点的决策:丧亲家庭的负担及相关因素

Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors.

作者信息

Yamamoto Sena, Arao Harue, Masutani Eiko, Aoki Miwa, Kishino Megumi, Morita Tatsuya, Shima Yasuo, Kizawa Yoshiyuki, Tsuneto Satoru, Aoyama Maho, Miyashita Mitsunori

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Social Medical Corporation Hakuaikai Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.

Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348
PMID:28189769
Abstract

CONTEXT

Decision making regarding the place of end-of-life (EOL) care is an important issue for patients with terminal cancer and their families. It often requires surrogate decision making, which can be a burden on families.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the burden on the family of patients dying from cancer related to the decisions they made about the place of EOL care and investigate the factors affecting this burden.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional mail survey using a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were 700 bereaved family members of patients with cancer from 133 palliative care units in Japan. The questionnaire covered decisional burdens, depression, grief, and the decision-making process.

RESULTS

Participants experienced emotional pressure as the highest burden. Participants with a high decisional burden reported significantly higher scores for depression and grief (both P < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses revealed that higher burden was associated with selecting a place of EOL care that differed from that desired by participants (P < 0.001) and patients (P = 0.034), decision making without knowing the patient's wishes and values (P < 0.001) and without participants sharing their wishes and values with the patient's doctors and/or nurses (P = 0.022), and making the decision because of a due date for discharge from a former facility or hospital (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Decision making regarding the place of EOL care was recalled as burdensome for family decision makers. An early decision-making process that incorporates sharing patients' and family members' values that are relevant to the desired place of EOL care is important.

摘要

背景

对于晚期癌症患者及其家属而言,临终关怀地点的决策是一个重要问题。这通常需要代理决策,而这可能给家庭带来负担。

目的

探讨癌症临终患者家庭因临终关怀地点决策而承受的负担,并调查影响该负担的因素。

方法

这是一项采用自填问卷的横断面邮寄调查。参与者为来自日本133个姑息治疗单位的700名癌症患者的丧亲家庭成员。问卷涵盖决策负担、抑郁、悲伤以及决策过程。

结果

参与者将情感压力视为最高负担。决策负担高的参与者在抑郁和悲伤方面的得分显著更高(均P<0.001)。多元回归分析显示,更高的负担与选择的临终关怀地点与参与者(P<0.001)和患者(P=0.034)期望的地点不同、在不了解患者意愿和价值观的情况下进行决策(P<0.001)以及参与者未与患者的医生和/或护士分享其意愿和价值观(P=0.022),以及因从前一机构或医院出院的截止日期而做出决策(P=0.005)有关。

结论

临终关怀地点的决策被家庭决策者回忆起是繁重的。纳入分享与期望的临终关怀地点相关的患者和家庭成员价值观的早期决策过程很重要。

相似文献

1
Decision Making Regarding the Place of End-of-Life Cancer Care: The Burden on Bereaved Families and Related Factors.关于终末期癌症护理地点的决策:丧亲家庭的负担及相关因素
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):862-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.348. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
Caregiver experience with decision-making difficulties in end-of-life care for patients with cardiovascular diseases.照顾者在心血管疾病患者临终关怀决策困难方面的体验。
J Cardiol. 2022 Apr;79(4):537-544. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
3
The relationship between cancer patients' place of death and bereaved caregivers' mental health status.癌症患者的死亡地点与丧亲照料者心理健康状况之间的关系。
Psychooncology. 2017 Nov;26(11):1959-1964. doi: 10.1002/pon.4412. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Unfinished Business in Families of Terminally Ill With Cancer Patients.癌症终末期患者家庭中的未竟之事。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):861-869. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
5
Effects of End-of-Life Discussions on the Mental Health of Bereaved Family Members and Quality of Patient Death and Care.临终讨论对丧亲家庭成员心理健康及患者死亡与护理质量的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):17-26.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Association Between Bereaved Families' Sense of Security and Their Experience of Death in Cancer Patients: Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study.癌症患者丧亲家庭的安全感与其死亡体验之间的关联:基于人群的横断面研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Japanese Bereaved Family Members' Perspectives of Palliative Care Units and Palliative Care: J-HOPE Study Results.日本丧亲家庭成员对姑息治疗病房及姑息治疗的看法:J-HOPE研究结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Jun;33(5):425-30. doi: 10.1177/1049909115578385. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
8
Depression and complicated grief in bereaved caregivers in cardiovascular diseases: prevalence and determinants.心血管疾病丧亲照料者的抑郁和复杂悲痛:患病率及决定因素。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e990-e1000. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002998.
9
Quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from the bereaved family members' perspective in Japan.从日本遗属视角看临终癌症护理的质量指标
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jun;37(6):1019-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.05.015. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
The association of family functioning and psychological distress in the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer: a nationwide survey of bereaved family members.晚期癌症患者丧亲家庭的家庭功能与心理困扰的关联:对丧亲家庭成员的全国性调查。
Psychooncology. 2021 Jan;30(1):74-83. doi: 10.1002/pon.5539. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of End-of-Life Decision-Making in Equine Veterinary and Charity Teams.马兽医和慈善团队中临终决策的经验
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;15(5):678. doi: 10.3390/ani15050678.
2
Experiences and barriers in downward referral decision-making for palliative care patient caregivers under China's three-tiered linkage model: A qualitative study.中国三级联动模式下姑息治疗患者照护者向下转诊决策中的经验与障碍:一项定性研究
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Aug 22;12:100578. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100578. eCollection 2025 Dec.
3
Providers' Competencies and Management Practices for Traditional Palliative Cancer Care Service Delivery in Kenya.
肯尼亚传统姑息性癌症护理服务提供中医疗服务提供者的能力与管理实践
Health Serv Insights. 2023 Nov 20;16:11786329231211780. doi: 10.1177/11786329231211780. eCollection 2023.
4
Breaking bad news in the era of artificial intelligence and algorithmic medicine: an exploration of disclosure and its ethical justification using the hedonic calculus.人工智能与算法医学时代的坏消息告知:运用享乐主义演算对信息披露及其伦理依据的探究
AI Ethics. 2022 Oct 31:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00230-z.
5
What does it mean to be the main caregiver to a terminally ill family member in Lithuania?: A qualitative study.作为立陶宛绝症患者的主要照顾者意味着什么?:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0265165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265165. eCollection 2022.
6
Expectations, end-of-life fears and end-of-life communication among palliative patients with cancer and caregivers: a cross-sectional study.癌症姑息治疗患者及其照护者的期望、临终恐惧和临终沟通:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 11;12(5):e058531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058531.
7
Factors That Facilitate Discussion and Documentation of End-of-Life Care among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.促进社区居住的老年人口终末期护理讨论和记录的因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074273.
8
The effectiveness of simulation education program on shared decision-making attitudes among nurses in Taiwan.台湾地区护士共享决策态度模拟教育计划的效果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 28;16(9):e0257902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257902. eCollection 2021.
9
Dealing with Family Conflicts in Decision-making in End-of-Life Care of Advanced Cancer Patients.晚期癌症患者临终关怀决策中的家庭冲突处理
Curr Oncol Rep. 2021 Aug 27;23(11):124. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01122-x.
10
Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.《生命维持治疗决策法案颁布后医生在进行生命维持治疗讨论时所面临的困难:一项横断面研究》
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):584-592. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.735. Epub 2020 Nov 19.