• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查在粪便免疫化学试验阳性的无症状一般风险个体中检测腺瘤的 pooled 率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):208-222.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.004
PMID:35413330
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopy in individuals positive for a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are ≥45% in men and ≥35% in women. These are based on weak, low-quality evidence. We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled ADR in FIT-positive colonoscopy.

METHODS

Major databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched in October 2021 for studies reporting on ADR of colonoscopy in a FIT-positive population. Meta-analysis was performed by standard methodology using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I and 95% prediction interval statistics.

RESULTS

Thirty-four high-quality studies that included more than 6 million asymptomatic average-risk individuals were analyzed; 2,655,345 individuals completed a screening FIT test. The pooled FIT screening rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 62.8-76.1), the pooled FIT positivity rate was 5.4% (95% CI, 4.3-6.9), and the colonoscopy completion rate was 85% (95% CI, 82.8-86.9). The pooled ADR was 47.8% (95% CI, 44.1-51.6), pooled advanced ADR was 25.3% (95% CI, 22-29), and the pooled colorectal cancer detection rate was 5.1% (95% CI, 4.4-5.9). The pooled ADR in men was 58.3% (95% CI, 52.8-63.6) and in women was 41.9% (95% CI, 36.4-47.6). The pooled ADR with qualitative FIT assessment was 67.7% (95% CI, 50.7-81), with 1-stool sample FIT was 52.8% (95% CI, 48.8-56.8), and at a cutoff threshold of 100 ng hemoglobin/mL was 52.1% (95% CI, 47-57.1). Based on time-period cumulative analysis, the ADR improved over time from 30.5% (95% CI, 24.6-37.2) to 47.8% (95% CI, 44.1-51.6).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the current ADR benchmarks for colonoscopy in FIT-positive individuals. Excellent pooled ADR parameters were demonstrated with qualitative assessment of 1 stool sample at a test cutoff value of 100 ng hemoglobin/mL, and ADR per endoscopist improved over time.

摘要

背景与目的

目前,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阳性人群行结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率(ADR)基准为男性≥45%,女性≥35%。这些基准是基于弱、低质量证据制定的。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定 FIT 阳性结肠镜检查的汇总 ADR。

方法

2021 年 10 月,我们在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 等主要数据库中检索了报告 FIT 阳性人群中结肠镜检查 ADR 的研究。采用随机效应模型的标准方法进行荟萃分析。使用 I 检验和 95%预测区间统计量评估异质性。

结果

分析了 34 项高质量研究,这些研究纳入了超过 600 万例无症状一般风险个体;265.5345 例个体完成了筛查性 FIT 检测。汇总的 FIT 筛查率为 69.8%(95%CI,62.8-76.1),FIT 阳性率为 5.4%(95%CI,4.3-6.9),结肠镜检查完成率为 85%(95%CI,82.8-86.9)。汇总的 ADR 为 47.8%(95%CI,44.1-51.6),汇总的高级 ADR 为 25.3%(95%CI,22-29),结直肠癌检出率为 5.1%(95%CI,4.4-5.9)。男性的 ADR 为 58.3%(95%CI,52.8-63.6),女性为 41.9%(95%CI,36.4-47.6)。采用定性 FIT 评估的 ADR 为 67.7%(95%CI,50.7-81),单份粪便样本 FIT 为 52.8%(95%CI,48.8-56.8),以 100ng 血红蛋白/ml 为检测截止值时为 52.1%(95%CI,47-57.1)。基于时间周期累积分析,ADR 随时间推移而改善,从 30.5%(95%CI,24.6-37.2)提高至 47.8%(95%CI,44.1-51.6)。

结论

本荟萃分析支持目前 FIT 阳性人群行结肠镜检查的 ADR 基准。采用定性评估 1 份粪便样本且检测截止值为 100ng 血红蛋白/ml 时,可获得出色的汇总 ADR 参数,并且随着时间推移,每位内镜医生的 ADR 均有所提高。

相似文献

1
Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查在粪便免疫化学试验阳性的无症状一般风险个体中检测腺瘤的 pooled 率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):208-222.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
3
Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.随机结肠镜检查试验对照组中腺瘤检出率的变异性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Feb;97(2):212-225.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 诊断的胸部影像学检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 16;5(5):CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub5.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
6
Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌级联筛查中结肠镜检查的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;37(4):620-631. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15762. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
7
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
8
Strategies for detecting colon cancer and/or dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.检测炎症性肠病患者结肠癌和/或发育异常的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub3.
9
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
10
A delay in colonoscopy after positive fecal tests leads to higher incidence of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便检测阳性后结肠镜检查的延迟会导致结直肠癌发病率升高:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1479-1486. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15381. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and Novel Colonoscopy Quality Metrics: What's Important in 2025.传统与新型结肠镜检查质量指标:2025年的关键要点
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025 Aug 8;27(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s11894-025-01006-1.
2
Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.新型结直肠癌筛查方法——机遇与挑战
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01037-7.
3
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
4
The Association of Metabolic Risk Factors with Advanced Adenomas in Hispanic Patients.代谢风险因素与西班牙裔患者高级腺瘤的相关性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Apr;69(4):1403-1410. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08323-x. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
5
Maximizing scarce colonoscopy resources: the crucial role of stool-based tests.最大化稀缺的结肠镜资源:基于粪便的检测的关键作用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 May 8;116(5):647-652. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae022.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.拉丁美洲的结直肠癌筛查项目:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354256. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54256.
7
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Clinical Laboratories.结直肠癌筛查:临床实验室的作用。
Clin Chem. 2024 Jan 4;70(1):150-164. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198.