Caporossi Tomaso, Carlà Matteo Mario, Gambini Gloria, De Vico Umberto, Baldascino Antonio, Rizzo Stanislao
Ophthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Ophthalmology Department, Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome, Italy.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 6;16:1069-1084. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S284620. eCollection 2022.
Pars plana vitrectomy has become the standard procedure for primary macular holes (MHs) repair, including the removal of the posterior cortical vitreous, the stripping of eventual epiretinal membranes, and finally an intraocular gas tamponade. During this procedure, peeling the internal limiting membrane (ILM) has been proven to increase closure rates and avoid postoperative reopening in several researches. In fact, even in large MHs more than 400 µm, the advantage of peeling off the ILM was highlighted by better anatomical closure rates. Nevertheless, some authors suggested that ILM peeling is not always essential, because it generates various side effects in retinal structure and function. Furthermore, the ideal amount of ILM peeling and the most effective strategies for removing the ILM are still subject of research. Different surgical modifications have been reported as alternatives to traditional peeling in certain clinical settings, including ILM flaps, ILM scraping, and foveal sparing ILM peeling. As regards large MHs, the introduction of ILM inverted flap appeared as a game changer, offering a significantly higher >90% closure rate when compared to traditional ILM peeling. Modifications to inverted ILM flap procedures have been claimed in recent years, in order to define the best area and direction of ILM peeling and its correlation with functional outcomes. Moreover, several innovations saw the light in the setting of recurrent MHs, such as ILM free flap transposition, inverted ILM flap combined autologous blood clot technique, neurosensory retinal flap, and human amniotic membrane (HAM) plug, claiming higher anatomical success rate also in those complex settings. In conclusion, the aim of this review is to report how the success rate of contemporary macular surgery has grown since the turn of the century, especially for big and chronic MHs, analyzing in which way ILM management became a crucial point of this kind of surgery.
玻璃体切割术已成为原发性黄斑裂孔(MH)修复的标准手术,包括切除后部皮质玻璃体、剥除可能存在的视网膜前膜,最后进行眼内气体填塞。在该手术过程中,多项研究已证实,剥除内界膜(ILM)可提高闭合率并避免术后复发。事实上,即使在直径超过400 µm的大黄斑裂孔中,剥除ILM在解剖学闭合率方面的优势也很明显。然而,一些作者认为ILM剥除并非总是必要的,因为它会对视网膜结构和功能产生各种副作用。此外,理想的ILM剥除量以及最有效的ILM去除策略仍在研究中。在某些临床情况下,已报道了不同的手术改良方法作为传统剥除术的替代方法,包括ILM瓣、ILM刮除术和保留黄斑中心凹的ILM剥除术。对于大黄斑裂孔,ILM倒置瓣的引入似乎是一个变革性的方法,与传统的ILM剥除术相比,其闭合率显著更高,超过90%。近年来,人们对倒置ILM瓣手术进行了改良,以确定ILM剥除的最佳区域和方向及其与功能结果的相关性。此外,在复发性MH的治疗中也出现了一些创新方法,如无ILM瓣移位、倒置ILM瓣联合自体血凝块技术、神经感觉视网膜瓣和人羊膜(HAM)栓塞,这些方法在这些复杂情况下也声称具有更高的解剖学成功率。总之,本综述的目的是报告自世纪之交以来现代黄斑手术的成功率如何提高,特别是对于大的和慢性的MH,分析ILM处理如何成为这类手术的关键点。