Nurkan Meryem, Eijgen Jan V, De Clerck Ivo, Stalmans Ingeborg, Barbosa-Breda João
Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 16;38(4):332-342. doi: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_156_24. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling aims to improve visual function. Previous studies have focused on visual acuity, often neglecting visual field (VF) changes. This systematic review examines VF changes after PPV with ILM peeling in patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) or macular hole (MH), including those with glaucoma, who have preexisting VF damage, to identify potential biases in glaucoma management. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (A) Patients undergoing ILM peeling for ERM or MH and (B) VF outcomes assessed through standard automated perimetry (SAP) or Goldmann kinetic perimetry. Exclusions were non-English studies and those with fewer than 30 subjects. Data included retinal disease, demographics, VF outcomes (mean deviation [MD], pattern standard deviation, and central VF sensitivity [CVFS]), study design, and use of stains. Out of 612 studies, 23 met our criteria. Of these, four included glaucoma patients and seven involved concomitant phacoemulsification. In glaucoma patients, two studies showed MD improvement in the central 24°, while one showed deterioration in the central 10°, linked to worse preoperative MD and older age. Among studies without glaucoma patients, three of eight using SAP reported increased VF defects (VFDs); two showed lower outer nasal CVFS postoperatively. Indocyanine green staining was linked to higher VFD incidence while triamcinolone acetonide or tryptane blue staining led to no significant VFDs. The nasal half of the central VF was more affected, possibly due to retinal ganglion cell distribution. Further prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to better understand ILM-peeling effects.
内界膜(ILM)剥除的玻璃体切割术(PPV)旨在改善视功能。以往研究主要关注视力,常常忽视视野(VF)变化。本系统评价研究了视网膜前膜(ERM)或黄斑裂孔(MH)患者行PPV联合ILM剥除术后的视野变化,包括那些已有视野损害的青光眼患者,以确定青光眼治疗中潜在的偏差。纳入标准如下:(A)因ERM或MH接受ILM剥除术的患者;(B)通过标准自动视野计(SAP)或戈德曼动态视野计评估的视野结果。排除非英文研究以及受试者少于30例的研究。数据包括视网膜疾病、人口统计学、视野结果(平均偏差[MD]、模式标准偏差和中心视野敏感度[CVFS])、研究设计以及染色剂的使用情况。在612项研究中,23项符合我们的标准。其中,4项纳入了青光眼患者,7项涉及同期白内障超声乳化术。在青光眼患者中,两项研究显示中心24°范围内MD改善,而一项研究显示中心10°范围内MD恶化,这与术前较差的MD和较高年龄有关。在无青光眼患者的研究中,8项使用SAP的研究中有3项报告视野缺损(VFD)增加;两项研究显示术后鼻侧外周CVFS降低。吲哚菁绿染色与较高的VFD发生率相关,而曲安奈德或台盼蓝染色未导致显著的VFD。中心视野的鼻侧半部分受影响更大,可能是由于视网膜神经节细胞分布所致。需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,包括随机对照试验,以更好地了解ILM剥除的效果。