• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济政策不确定性与商品市场波动:对经济复苏的影响。

Economic policy uncertainty and commodity market volatility: implications for economic recovery.

机构信息

School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China.

Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60662-60673. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19328-2. Epub 2022 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-19328-2
PMID:35426558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010710/
Abstract

As a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, most commodities experienced significant price drops, which were expected to continue well into 2020. As a result, the Markov switching model is used to study the influence of policy uncertainty and the COVID-19 pandemic on commodity prices in the USA. Commodity markets are stimulated by economic policy uncertainty, according to results from a two-state Markov switching model. In both high and low regimes, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) influences the commodity market, according to the study's findings. However, in the high regime, EPU has a greater influence on the energy and metal sectors. EPU has different influences on commodity markets in high- and low-volatility regimes, according to this study. There is a wide range of correlations between COVID-19 outcomes and EPU and how the prices of natural gas, oil, corn, silver, soybean, copper, gold, and steel respond to these tremors, in both high- and low-volatility tenure. Oil and natural gas, on the other hand, are unaffected by shifts in COVID-19 death rates under either regime. Results show that in both high- and low-volatility regimes, the demand and supply for most commodities are responsive to historical prices.

摘要

由于 COVID-19 大流行的爆发,大多数商品的价格都经历了大幅下跌,预计这种情况将持续到 2020 年。因此,采用马尔可夫转换模型来研究政策不确定性和 COVID-19 大流行对美国商品价格的影响。结果表明,经济政策不确定性会刺激商品市场。根据两状态马尔可夫转换模型的结果,经济政策不确定性(EPU)在高、低两种情况下都影响商品市场。然而,在高经济政策不确定性时期,EPU 对能源和金属行业的影响更大。根据这项研究,EPU 在高波动和低波动时期对商品市场的影响是不同的。COVID-19 结果和 EPU 与天然气、石油、玉米、银、大豆、铜、金和钢的价格如何对这些波动做出反应之间存在广泛的相关性,无论是在高波动还是低波动时期都是如此。另一方面,在任何一种情况下,COVID-19 死亡率的变化都不会影响石油和天然气。结果表明,在高波动和低波动时期,大多数商品的供需对历史价格都有反应。

相似文献

1
Economic policy uncertainty and commodity market volatility: implications for economic recovery.经济政策不确定性与商品市场波动:对经济复苏的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60662-60673. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19328-2. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
2
COVID-19 pandemic and economic policy uncertainty regimes affect commodity market volatility.新冠疫情和经济政策不确定性状况影响大宗商品市场波动。
Resour Policy. 2021 Dec;74:102303. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102303. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
On the relation between Pandemic Disease Outbreak News and Crude oil, Gold, Gold mining, Silver and Energy Markets.关于大流行病爆发新闻与原油、黄金、黄金开采、白银及能源市场之间的关系。
Resour Policy. 2021 Aug;72:102025. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102025. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Price-switching spillovers between gold, oil, and stock markets: Evidence from the USA and China during the COVID-19 pandemic.黄金、石油和股票市场之间的价格转换溢出效应:来自美国和中国在新冠疫情期间的证据。
Resour Policy. 2021 Oct;73:102217. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102217. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
5
Asymmetric spillover between economic policy uncertainty and exchange rate volatility: A global network connectedness perspective.经济政策不确定性与汇率波动之间的非对称溢出:全球网络关联视角。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0279729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279729. eCollection 2023.
6
Macro factors and the realized volatility of commodities: A dynamic network analysis.宏观因素与大宗商品的已实现波动率:动态网络分析
Resour Policy. 2020 Oct;68:101813. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101813. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Does COVID-19 pandemic cause natural resources commodity prices volatility? Empirical evidence from China.新冠疫情是否导致自然资源商品价格波动?来自中国的实证证据。
Resour Policy. 2022 Aug;77:102721. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102721. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
8
Exploring time-varying impact of world pandemic uncertainty on China's commodity prices using TVP-SVAR-SV model.利用时变参数向量自回归-随机波动(TVP-SVAR-SV)模型探索世界疫情不确定性对中国商品价格的时变影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;10:950010. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950010. eCollection 2022.
9
Impact of oil price volatility and economic policy uncertainty on business investment - Insights from the energy sector.油价波动与经济政策不确定性对企业投资的影响——来自能源部门的见解
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 15;10(5):e26533. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26533. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
10
Commodity dynamism in the COVID-19 crisis: Are gold, oil, and stock commodity prices, symmetrical?新冠疫情危机中的大宗商品动态:黄金、石油和股票大宗商品价格是否对称?
Resour Policy. 2022 Dec;79:103033. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103033. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantile connectedness in agri-commodity markets: What has changed over past six decades?农产品市场的分位数连通性:过去六十年发生了哪些变化?
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 8;9(3):e13463. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13463. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Exploring time-varying impact of world pandemic uncertainty on China's commodity prices using TVP-SVAR-SV model.利用时变参数向量自回归-随机波动(TVP-SVAR-SV)模型探索世界疫情不确定性对中国商品价格的时变影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;10:950010. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.950010. eCollection 2022.