• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于Q方法的人工智能驱动价值共创核心要素探索——消费者认知态度测量

Exploration on the Core Elements of Value Co-creation Driven by AI-Measurement of Consumer Cognitive Attitude Based on Q-Methodology.

作者信息

Zhu Yi, Wang Peng, Duan Wenjie

机构信息

Business School, Shanghai Jianqiao University, Shanghai, China.

International Governance Research Center for Cyberspace, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:791167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791167. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791167
PMID:35432076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9010941/
Abstract

Value co-creation (VCC) goes through the stage of co-production, customer experience, service-dominant logic, and service ecosystem. The integration of science and technology has become a key factor to the process of VCC. The rise and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has added a new driving force to VCC and began to affect its original practical logic. Based on the consumer perspective, this study uses Q-methodology to measure consumer cognitive attitude toward the use of AI technology in VCC, aiming to explore the key factors that affect VCC. The study found that content quality, information security, efficiency concern, and degree of manipulation have become the important concerns of consumers for VCC under AI integration. Moreover, their different statements have their specific focus and direction. The study demonstrates and analyzes the importance of the four factors and proposes the combination of human and non-human actors (technology and system) to shape the new model of VCC in the future, which is worth further deepening and exploring for academia and enterprises.

摘要

价值共创(VCC)经历了共同生产、客户体验、服务主导逻辑和服务生态系统等阶段。科技融合已成为价值共创过程的关键因素。人工智能(AI)技术的兴起与应用为价值共创增添了新动力,并开始影响其原有的实践逻辑。本研究从消费者视角出发,运用Q方法来衡量消费者对在价值共创中使用人工智能技术的认知态度,旨在探索影响价值共创的关键因素。研究发现,内容质量、信息安全、效率关切和操控程度已成为人工智能融合背景下消费者对价值共创的重要关注点。此外,他们的不同表述有其特定的侧重点和方向。该研究论证并分析了这四个因素的重要性,并提出了人类与非人类行为体(技术和系统)相结合的方式,以塑造未来价值共创的新模式,这值得学术界和企业进一步深入探讨。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de44/9010941/5f34922a5baa/fpsyg-13-791167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de44/9010941/5f34922a5baa/fpsyg-13-791167-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de44/9010941/5f34922a5baa/fpsyg-13-791167-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploration on the Core Elements of Value Co-creation Driven by AI-Measurement of Consumer Cognitive Attitude Based on Q-Methodology.基于Q方法的人工智能驱动价值共创核心要素探索——消费者认知态度测量
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:791167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791167. eCollection 2022.
2
Value co-creation in business-to-business context: A bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOS viewer.企业对企业背景下的价值共创:使用HistCite和VOSviewer的文献计量分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1027775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027775. eCollection 2022.
3
From "Human-to-Human" to "Human-to-Non-human" - Influence Factors of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Consumer Value Co-creation Behavior.从“人到人”到“人到非人”——人工智能赋能的消费者价值共创行为的影响因素
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:863313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313. eCollection 2022.
4
Is Artificial Intelligence Customer Service Satisfactory? Insights Based on Microblog Data and User Interviews.人工智能客服是否令人满意?基于微博数据和用户访谈的洞察。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Feb;25(2):110-117. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0155. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
Online Customer Experience Leads to Loyalty Customer Engagement: Moderating Role of Value Co-creation.在线客户体验带来忠诚度 客户参与度:价值共创的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 28;13:897851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897851. eCollection 2022.
6
What type of client do you need? The brand value co-creation in the banking sector.你需要什么样的客户?银行业中的品牌价值共创。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:988985. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988985. eCollection 2022.
7
Explore an open-source value co-creation framework: A multiple case study.探索开源价值共创框架:多案例研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 20;19(9):e0310516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310516. eCollection 2024.
8
The impact of artificial intelligence on event experiences: a scenario technique approach.人工智能对活动体验的影响:一种情景技术方法。
Electron Mark. 2021;31(3):601-617. doi: 10.1007/s12525-020-00433-4. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
9
How smart senior care can achieve value co-creation: Evidence from China.智慧养老如何实现价值共创:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 15;10:973439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.973439. eCollection 2022.
10
Understanding interactive user behavior in smart media content service: An integration of TAM and smart service belief factors.理解智能媒体内容服务中的交互式用户行为:技术接受模型与智能服务信念因素的整合
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 6;5(12):e02983. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02983. eCollection 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creation or Co-destruction: A Perspective of Online Customer Engagement Valence.共创还是共毁:在线客户参与效价视角
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 3;11:591753. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591753. eCollection 2020.
2
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
3
Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science : Seattle, WA, USA. 24-26 September 2015.
2015年第三届实施研究协作学会(SIRC)双年会议论文集:通过社区伙伴关系和团队科学推进高效方法:美国华盛顿州西雅图。2015年9月24日至26日。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jun 23;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0428-0.
4
The acupuncture wars: the professionalizing of American acupuncture--a view from Massachusetts.针灸之战:美国针灸的专业化——来自马萨诸塞州的视角
Med Anthropol. 2003 Jul-Sep;22(3):261-301. doi: 10.1080/01459740306772.