• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从“人到人”到“人到非人”——人工智能赋能的消费者价值共创行为的影响因素

From "Human-to-Human" to "Human-to-Non-human" - Influence Factors of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Consumer Value Co-creation Behavior.

作者信息

Wen Haitao, Zhang Lulu, Sheng Ao, Li Mingda, Guo Bingfeng

机构信息

School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:863313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313
PMID:35602701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9120962/
Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has changed traditional methods of value co-creation. Diverging from traditional methods, this study discusses the influencing factors of AI-supported consumer value co-creation from the perspective of human-to-non-human interactions. This study adopts the stimulus-organism-response framework with consumer engagement (CE) as the intermediary to explore the impact of consumers' personal subjective factors, community factors, and perceptions of AI technology on their value co-creating behaviors. Data were collected from 528 respondents from the Huawei Huafen Club, Xiaomi BBS, Apple China Virtual Brand, Micromobile Phone, and Lenovo communities. SPSS Amos software was used for statistical analysis, revealing that perceived personalization, autonomy, community identity, trust in AI, and self-efficacy are motivational factors that have significant effects on consumer value co-creation behaviors, in which CE plays a significant intermediary role. Our study contributes to the literature on consumer value co-creation supported by AI technology. We also offer important insights for developers of AI-enabled products and service managers.

摘要

人工智能(AI)的出现改变了传统的价值共创方式。本研究有别于传统方法,从人与非人类互动的角度探讨了人工智能支持下的消费者价值共创的影响因素。本研究采用以消费者参与度(CE)为中介的刺激—机体—反应框架,以探究消费者个人主观因素、社区因素以及对人工智能技术的认知对其价值共创行为的影响。数据收集自华为花粉俱乐部、小米论坛、苹果中国虚拟品牌、小米手机和联想社区的528名受访者。使用SPSS Amos软件进行统计分析,结果显示,感知个性化、自主性、社区认同感、对人工智能的信任和自我效能感是对消费者价值共创行为有显著影响的动机因素,其中消费者参与度起到了显著的中介作用。我们的研究为人工智能技术支持下的消费者价值共创文献做出了贡献。我们还为人工智能产品开发者和服务管理者提供了重要见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8a/9120962/b3e19072511d/fpsyg-13-863313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8a/9120962/42700c1f6ad6/fpsyg-13-863313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8a/9120962/b3e19072511d/fpsyg-13-863313-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8a/9120962/42700c1f6ad6/fpsyg-13-863313-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a8a/9120962/b3e19072511d/fpsyg-13-863313-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
From "Human-to-Human" to "Human-to-Non-human" - Influence Factors of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Consumer Value Co-creation Behavior.从“人到人”到“人到非人”——人工智能赋能的消费者价值共创行为的影响因素
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:863313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863313. eCollection 2022.
2
Value acquisition, value co-creation: The impact of perceived organic grocerant value on customer engagement behavior through brand trust.价值获取、价值共创:感知到的有机食品杂货店价值通过品牌信任对顾客参与行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 5;13:990545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990545. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of value co-creation on consumer citizenship behavior: Based on consumer perspective.价值共创对消费者公民行为的影响:基于消费者视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1110011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1110011. eCollection 2022.
4
"Net" value co-creation: The effect of interactions on consumer citizenship behavior in online travel communities.“净”价值共创:互动对在线旅游社区中消费者公民行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 15;13:991009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991009. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploration on the Core Elements of Value Co-creation Driven by AI-Measurement of Consumer Cognitive Attitude Based on Q-Methodology.基于Q方法的人工智能驱动价值共创核心要素探索——消费者认知态度测量
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:791167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.791167. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of differential pricing subject on consumer behavior.差别定价主体对消费者行为的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 9;12(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01928-x.
7
Sustaining Continuous Engagement in Value Co-creation Among Individuals in Universities Using Online Platforms: Role of Knowledge Self-Efficacy, Commitment and Perceived Benefits.利用在线平台维持大学个体间价值共创的持续参与:知识自我效能感、承诺和感知利益的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:637808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808. eCollection 2021.
8
Consumers' willingness to pay premium under the influence of consumer community culture: From the perspective of the content creator.消费者社群文化影响下消费者支付溢价的意愿:从内容创作者的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1009724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009724. eCollection 2022.
9
Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence.人工智能时代的客户体验。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jan;114:106548. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
10
Is Artificial Intelligence Customer Service Satisfactory? Insights Based on Microblog Data and User Interviews.人工智能客服是否令人满意?基于微博数据和用户访谈的洞察。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 Feb;25(2):110-117. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.0155. Epub 2021 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting trust and intention to adopt health information generated by ChatGPT among healthcare customers: An empirical study.促进医疗保健客户对ChatGPT生成的健康信息的信任和采用意愿:一项实证研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 28;11:20552076251374121. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374121. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
An empirical investigation of trust in AI in a Chinese petrochemical enterprise based on institutional theory.基于制度理论的中国石化企业人工智能信任的实证研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 30;11(1):13564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92904-7.
2
Sustaining Continuous Engagement in Value Co-creation Among Individuals in Universities Using Online Platforms: Role of Knowledge Self-Efficacy, Commitment and Perceived Benefits.利用在线平台维持大学个体间价值共创的持续参与:知识自我效能感、承诺和感知利益的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:637808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637808. eCollection 2021.
3
Value Co-creation in Third-Party Managed Virtual Communities and Brand Equity.
第三方管理的虚拟社区中的价值共创与品牌资产
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00927. eCollection 2020.
4
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
5
Exploring the impact of online information signals in leveraging the economic returns of physicians.探讨在线信息信号对提升医生经济回报的影响。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103272. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103272. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction.迈向人机交互中机器人自主水平的框架。
J Hum Robot Interact. 2014 Jul;3(2):74-99. doi: 10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer.
7
The Effects of Transformational Leadership and Mediating Factors on the Organizational Success Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Case Study.运用结构方程模型探究变革型领导及中介因素对组织成功的影响:一项案例研究
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2016 Jan/Mar;35(1):58-71. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000090.
8
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.一个(通常是混合的)刻板印象内容模型:能力和热情分别源于感知到的地位和竞争。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902.