Suppr超能文献

对领导力的担忧:这对男性和女性领导者来说是一种劣势还是优势?

Worrying About Leadership: Is It a Liability or an Advantage for Leadership of Women and Men?

作者信息

Karakulak Arzu, Başkurt Ayşe Burçin, Koseoglu Gamze, Aycan Zeynep

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Istanbul Policy Center, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:675522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.675522. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Worries about leadership (WAL) is a new construct tapping worries an individual may feel about possible negative consequences of accepting a leadership role. Three studies investigate how WAL is associated with men's and women's willingness for leadership and their perceived leadership potential rated by others. The first is a laboratory study on 328 participants, which shows that WAL is negatively associated with women's willingness for leadership, while it is not related to that of men. The second study, which is a field study with multilevel-nested data from 429 employees and 101 supervisors, reveals that male subordinates are more likely to receive a favorable judgment of leadership potential by their supervisors when their WAL increases, while female subordinates' WAL is irrelevant to this judgment. The final study, which is an experimental study on 122 supervisors, shows that supervisors view hypothetical male leadership candidates with high WAL as having higher warmth and lower competence (than those with low WAL), which both mediate the effect of WAL on judgments of their leadership potential made by the supervisors. Even though supervisors also view female candidates with high WAL as warmer, this does not evoke higher perceptions of leadership potential. Implications for increasing gender parity in leadership are discussed.

摘要

对领导力的担忧(WAL)是一种新的构念,它反映了个体对接受领导角色可能产生的负面后果的担忧。三项研究探讨了WAL如何与男性和女性的领导意愿以及他人对他们领导潜力的评价相关联。第一项是对328名参与者进行的实验室研究,结果表明WAL与女性的领导意愿呈负相关,而与男性的领导意愿无关。第二项研究是一项实地研究,收集了429名员工和101名主管的多层次嵌套数据,结果显示,当男性下属的WAL增加时,他们更有可能得到主管对其领导潜力的积极评价,而女性下属的WAL与这一评价无关。最后一项研究是对122名主管进行的实验研究,结果表明,主管认为具有高WAL的假设男性领导候选人比低WAL的候选人更热情但能力更低,这两者都在WAL对主管对其领导潜力的判断的影响中起中介作用。尽管主管也认为具有高WAL的女性候选人更热情,但这并没有引发对其领导潜力的更高评价。文中讨论了对提高领导领域性别平等的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22a2/9012187/54e7b806d062/fpsyg-13-675522-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Worrying About Leadership: Is It a Liability or an Advantage for Leadership of Women and Men?
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:675522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.675522. eCollection 2022.
2
Leadership During Crisis: An Examination of Supervisory Leadership Behavior and Gender During COVID-19.
J Leadersh Organ Stud. 2022 May;29(2):190-207. doi: 10.1177/15480518211010761.
4
Which leadership style do more narcissistic subordinates prefer in supervisors?
J Pers. 2025 Apr;93(2):503-523. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12950. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
5
Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinates' Trust in Supervisors: Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction.
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:722620. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722620. eCollection 2021.
6
When supervisors perceive non-work support: test of a trickle-down model.
J Psychol. 2014 Mar-Apr;148(2):215-51. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.774200.
7
Protecting their turf: When and why supervisors undermine employee boundary spanning.
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Jun;107(6):1009-1019. doi: 10.1037/apl0000960. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
Meet the new boss…same as the old boss? Female supervisors and subordinate career prospects.
Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jan;40(1):298. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.001.

本文引用的文献

2
Attachment and leadership: review and new insights.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):772-87. doi: 10.1037/xge0000165. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502567112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1129-45. doi: 10.1037/a0036751. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):616-42. doi: 10.1037/a0023557.
7
How we see ourselves and how we see others.
Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1177-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1154199.
8
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):336-56. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
9
Leadership and the fate of organizations.
Am Psychol. 2008 Feb-Mar;63(2):96-110. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.2.96.
10
Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: consequences for women's performance.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):764-79. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验