• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术中迷走神经保留技术的安全性与有效性

Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve preservation technique during minimally invasive esophagectomy.

作者信息

Chen Xiankai, Luo Peng, Xie Hounai, Yang Yafan, Zhang Ruixiang, Qin Jianjun, Seder Christopher W, Kim Min P, Flores Raja, Xu Lei, Li Yin

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 Mar;10(6):336. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1141.

DOI:10.21037/atm-22-1141
PMID:35434033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9011232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of McKeown surgery with vagal-sparing using minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

McKeown surgery with vagal-sparing technique using MIE was adopted on patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal cancer. From June 2020 to January 2021, a total of 20 patients from the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the National Clinical Research Center for Cancer were enrolled.

RESULTS

The study group included 17 (85%) males and 3 (15%) females, with an average age of 62.6 (±7.1) years. The most common tumor location was lower thoracic esophagus (n=9, 45%), followed by middle thoracic esophagus (n=8, 40%) and upper thoracic esophagus (n=3, 15%). Nine (45%) patients had T1b disease, followed by T2 (n=8, 40%), T1a (n=2, 10%), and Tis (n=1, 5%). The average operation time was 221.5 (±61.2) minutes. Postoperative complications were as follow: 2 (10%) with hoarseness, 2 (10%) with pulmonary infection, 1 (5%) with arrhythmia, 1 (5%) with anastomotic leakage, 1 (5%) with delayed gastric emptying, 1 (5%) with pleural effusion, and 1 (5%) with diarrhea. Dumping syndrome, cholestasis, and chylothorax were not observed, and there was no perioperative death.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE with vagus nerve preservation is a feasible and safe technique, with the possibility to be an alternative for esophageal carcinoma. Further study is needed to explore the functional outcome of preserving vagus nerve.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估采用微创食管切除术(MIE)的保留迷走神经的麦克尤恩手术的可行性、疗效和安全性。

方法

对诊断为可切除食管癌的患者采用MIE的保留迷走神经技术进行麦克尤恩手术。2020年6月至2021年1月,国家癌症临床研究中心胸外科共纳入20例患者。

结果

研究组包括17例(85%)男性和3例(15%)女性,平均年龄62.6(±7.1)岁。最常见的肿瘤部位是胸段食管下段(n = 9,45%),其次是胸段食管中段(n = 8,40%)和胸段食管上段(n = 3,15%)。9例(45%)患者为T1b期疾病,其次是T2期(n = 8,40%)、T1a期(n = 2,10%)和Tis期(n = 1,5%)。平均手术时间为221.5(±61.2)分钟。术后并发症如下:2例(10%)声音嘶哑,2例(10%)肺部感染,1例(5%)心律失常,1例(5%)吻合口漏,1例(5%)胃排空延迟,1例(5%)胸腔积液,1例(5%)腹泻。未观察到倾倒综合征、胆汁淤积和乳糜胸,且无围手术期死亡。

结论

保留迷走神经的MIE是一种可行且安全的技术,有可能成为食管癌的替代治疗方法。需要进一步研究以探索保留迷走神经的功能结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/f1643b584384/atm-10-06-336-vidS.2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/bca4e1333ab3/atm-10-06-336-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/ca8d82554acd/atm-10-06-336-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/41e2f90d67be/atm-10-06-336-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/319fd8c7a193/atm-10-06-336-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/4ec3c15a93cb/atm-10-06-336-vidS.1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/f1643b584384/atm-10-06-336-vidS.2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/bca4e1333ab3/atm-10-06-336-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/ca8d82554acd/atm-10-06-336-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/41e2f90d67be/atm-10-06-336-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/319fd8c7a193/atm-10-06-336-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/4ec3c15a93cb/atm-10-06-336-vidS.1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85b5/9011232/f1643b584384/atm-10-06-336-vidS.2.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve preservation technique during minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术中迷走神经保留技术的安全性与有效性
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Mar;10(6):336. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1141.
2
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].[微创Ivor-Lewis与微创McKeown食管癌切除术围手术期并发症的临床观察]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 23;44(6):577-580. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626.
3
Modified McKeown traditional McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy in improving short-term efficacy and the quality of life of esophageal cancers: a retrospective comparative cohort study.改良McKeown术与传统McKeown术及微创食管切除术对提高食管癌短期疗效和生活质量的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Aug;13(4):1579-1588. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-712.
4
[Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].单孔腹腔镜与胸腔镜McKeown食管癌切除术的临床应用与分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 3;101(29):2316-2321. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201215-03359.
5
A revamped MIC-McKeown operation without removing azygos vein arch, bronchial artery and vagus nerve trunk.改良的 MIC-McKeown 手术,不切除奇静脉弓、支气管动脉和迷走神经干。
BMC Surg. 2023 Mar 18;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01903-0.
6
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: Experience of 251 patients.根据肿瘤位置进行的微创食管癌切除术:251例患者的经验
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Apr 1;17:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.03.038. eCollection 2017 May.
7
McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.麦克尤恩或艾弗·刘易斯式完全微创食管癌和胃食管交界癌切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.173.
8
Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience.微创 McKeown 食管切除术治疗 1023 例连续食管癌患者的安全性和有效性:单中心经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Mar 15;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01781-2.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.胸腔镜腹腔镜 McKeown 食管癌根治术中预防性胸导管结扎的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5023-5029. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07297-6. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Two-rope method for dissecting esophagus in McKeown MIE.麦克尤恩微创食管癌切除术(McKeown MIE)中食管解剖的双绳法
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1031142. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1031142. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in vagus nerve management strategies in thoracoscopic lung resections: a narrative review.胸腔镜肺切除术中迷走神经管理策略的进展:一项叙述性综述
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5298-5308. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2211. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
"One Size Doesn't Fit All": Nutrition Care Needs in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Survivors-A Qualitative Study.“一刀切并不适用于所有人”:食管癌和胃癌幸存者的营养护理需求——一项定性研究
Nutrients. 2025 May 2;17(9):1567. doi: 10.3390/nu17091567.
3
Occurrence of Dumping Syndrome After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional syndromes and symptom-orientated aftercare after esophagectomy.食管切除术后的功能性综合征和症状导向的康复治疗。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2249-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02203-y. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Perioperative safety and short-term efficacy of functional minimally invasive esophagectomy.功能性微创食管切除术的围手术期安全性和短期疗效。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211010081. doi: 10.1177/03000605211010081.
3
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
食管癌手术后倾倒综合征的发生:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):791-800. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15881-x. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
4
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
5
Vagus nerve preservation during minimally invasive esophagectomy with 2-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal carcinoma: A more physiological alternative.食管癌微创食管切除术联合二野淋巴结清扫术中保留迷走神经:一种更符合生理的选择。
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov 5;2018. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2018.052.
6
Preservation of the vagus nerves in subtotal esophagectomy without thoracotomy.非开胸食管次全切除术中迷走神经的保留
Acta Cir Bras. 2018 Sep;33(9):834-841. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020180090000012.
7
Preserving the pulmonary vagus nerve branches during thoracoscopic esophagectomy.在胸腔镜食管切除术期间保留肺迷走神经分支。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3816-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4683-y. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
History of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer and the future prospects for esophageal cancer surgery.食管癌淋巴结清扫术的历史及食管癌手术的未来前景。
Surg Today. 2015 Feb;45(2):140-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-0841-4. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
9
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放食管切除术治疗食管癌患者:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验
J Thorac Dis. 2012 Oct;4(5):465-6. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.08.16.
10
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.