Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2130-2142. doi: 10.1177/15248380221084749. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
Bisexual-identifying individuals appear to be at increased risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) compared to people of other sexualities. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to examine risk and protective factors for the perpetration of IPV against bisexual victims and to provide a preliminary quality assessment of the included studies. A systematic search of academic and grey literature was conducted in February 2021. Inclusion criteria specified that study participants identified as bisexual, that the study examined risk or protective factors for IPV, and that findings were disaggregated by sexual identity. All potentially eligible references were independently screened by two reviewers, and conflicts settled by a third reviewer. Nine articles published between 2013 and 2021 met criteria for inclusion. Data extraction was completed for all included studies, and findings presented in a narrative synthesis. The review identified a number of risk factors, including bisexual identity, internalised homophobia, discrimination, partner gender, negative childhood experiences and non-monogamy. One study included consideration of a potentially protective factor. The majority of the included studies were cross-sectional in design. More longitudinal studies are needed to clarify temporality of the associations identified and better inform support and prevention efforts. Further implications for future research, policies and practise are discussed.
双性恋者似乎比其他性取向的人更容易经历亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)。本系统范围审查的目的是检查针对双性恋受害者的 IPV 侵害的风险和保护因素,并对纳入的研究进行初步质量评估。2021 年 2 月,对学术和灰色文献进行了系统搜索。纳入标准规定,研究参与者自认为是双性恋,研究检查了 IPV 的风险或保护因素,并且研究结果按性身份进行了细分。两名评审员独立筛选了所有潜在合格的参考文献,由第三名评审员解决冲突。2013 年至 2021 年期间发表的九篇文章符合纳入标准。对所有纳入的研究都进行了数据提取,并以叙述性综合的形式呈现研究结果。该审查确定了一些风险因素,包括双性恋身份、内化的恐同症、歧视、伴侣性别、童年不良经历和非单一性关系。一项研究考虑了一个潜在的保护因素。大多数纳入的研究都是横断面设计。需要更多的纵向研究来澄清所确定的关联的时间顺序,并更好地为支持和预防工作提供信息。进一步讨论了对未来研究、政策和实践的影响。